Definitely not.This. Will. Just. Be. The. iPhone. Mini. Más. O. Menos.
It’ll be an XR or at the very best an 11.
Mini has dual cameras and OLED. Apple won’t sell an OLED + dual camera iPhone for $429 in 2023-2024.
Definitely not.This. Will. Just. Be. The. iPhone. Mini. Más. O. Menos.
Why would that change take courage from Apple?Do you guys think Apple will have enough courage and we will see iPhone SE (2023) implementing the USB-C?
No OLED. No Touch ID side-button. No new hybrid design.Yeah, I'm on the Xs and my wife is on the 11. If they release this thing with an OLED, I'll upgrade to it. My wife will do the same as long as the storage options are big enough.
Why would that change take courage from Apple?
But that would require r&d for a new design and front facing camera setup.Surely some sort of notch (albeit maybe a smaller one) is still needed for the front-facing camera?
iPhone SE - the SE stand for Stock Emptying.
If there’s still a bunch of old iPhone 8 chassis in Apple’s stock then the next iPhone SE will use that. If they’ve sold enough of those old iPhone 8 leftover bodies, Tim Apple will move on to the unused iPhone XR chassis and sell them off as “new design iPhone SE”.
But that would require courageToo much speculation (at Apple?), give us an Iphone Mini with iPad Air style Touch ID and basta!
I like the Touch ID and there is no price tag to convince me to change to Face ID.
But that would require r&d for a new design and front facing camera setup.
“Develop” is such a big word for an essentially same old chip, same old body. “Mix and match inventory” is more like it.
They need their entry level flagships to be successful too or else there’s no point in making them. When the 12 Mini and 13 Mini weren’t successful, they didn’t just keep making new Minis, they went with something they thought would sell more (the equally failed 14 Plus).What do you mean it didn't work well. Look at the high demand of the 14 Pros and Pro Maxes. In the end, Apple gets more money. Seems like it worked perfectly well for Apple.
In the end, Apple prefer more people buying their $1000 phones. Why would Apple want more people buying their cheapest phone?
Right, but not the same size.They currently have 3 iPads in roughly the same size, iPad 10, Air, and 11" Pro.
iPad Pro 11”Right, but not the same size.
Next year, last year’s iPhone won’t have the same processor as the brand new one. That was a one time overlap in order to establish the new differentiation strategy (which, as has been pointed out, didn’t really hurt iPhone revenue - it merely shifted the product mix to the higher end model).Yeah that tiering bs didn’t work out too well for Apple this year. Nobody cares about the non-Pros with last year’s chip. We might not see that nonsense stick around next year.
Which is why I believe having an SE at the same size would be a mistake.Also, if we look at the legacy iPhone lineup which includes the still-available 12 and 13, there are already a dizzying array of ~6” iPhones. Adding one more is not going to change things much.
A key difference is they market the iPads at different sizes (well at least two of them).iPad Pro 11”
iPad Air 10.86”
iPad 10.86”
iPhone Pro 6.12”
iPhone 6.06”
iPhone SE4 6.06” (XR/11 screen size)
A $120 increase from current starting price of an iPhone SE 3 is not going to happen. For $50 more, you can get a 1 year old (and better, IMO) former semi-flagship.
By the time this comes out in (rumored) 2024, the iPhone 14 will probably be discounted to around $599 like how the iPhone 13 Mini is now.
$449 or $479 is more likely than $549.
They wouldn’t just put a XR/11 style front-facing camera array in SE4 and shut off cameras, or just be able to simply remove the Face ID components and leave the regular front facing selfie camera -That’s all added r&d to develop a new Face ID-less notch. Too costly in an SE.Huh? Whichever design they base it off, it will already have a front facing camera. All of Apple’s iPhones since the X have a front-facing camera in the notch.
Just put a new chip into the iPhone 13 mini and call it a day. Or even the iPhone 12 mini as it is still fine, if you want to save a few bucks in the production.
I think it will be $499, with the 2022 SE remains at $429.Agree. I think $449 is a good target to expect. Maybe they’ll even surprise us and keep it at $429. Some have suggested the SE3 could stick around (like the iPad 9 did) enabling the SE4 to move up. Possible, but I think it has run its course based on waning sales.
As long as they don’t do what they did with the iPad 10th gen, offering a new design at an higher cost. Most people in the market for an SE probably don’t care about design change, they probably care more about the price.Agreed, the iPhone 8 form factor needs to go.
Incorrect!The current third-generation iPhone SE is Apple's smallest device, modeled after the iPhone 8. It measures in at 4.7 inches, and it is the only iPhone that includes thick bezels and a Touch ID Home button.