Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, I'm on the Xs and my wife is on the 11. If they release this thing with an OLED, I'll upgrade to it. My wife will do the same as long as the storage options are big enough.
No OLED. No Touch ID side-button. No new hybrid design.

Look at the SEs track-record and then stop all this day dreaming.

XR or best case scenario an 11.
 
Why would that change take courage from Apple?

USB-C on iPhones could truly be one of man’s greatest achievements in our time. A real “moon shot” project. The stakes immense, the R&D costs enormous. Failure could mean disaster and bankruptcy. By my god, if the rumours are true they might just have gone and done it.

Good luck, Apple. Our hearts and wallets are with you! Be bold, be brave, and change the world.
 
Surely some sort of notch (albeit maybe a smaller one) is still needed for the front-facing camera?
But that would require r&d for a new design and front facing camera setup.

Apple doesn’t spend that kind of r&d for SEs. Never has, never will. Not for an iPhone with a <$500 price tag.

The average consumer equates new design with new product. And Apple cannot risk having anyone look at an SE and consider its value/$ or newness to be equal to the current mid-tier or Pro.

It’s more likely to see another new iPhone 8 for SE than it is that they spend r&d to rework the front-facing cameras and notch to be Face ID-less and to put Touch ID in the side-button.

Look at iPad 10 -if you want those kind of upgrades, Apple is going to slap some $100 on top of the budget-friendly price to compensate for the added r&d expenses.

A Touch ID side-button XR with a new Face ID-less notch would start at $479-$529.
 
«It is not yet clear if Apple will use LCD or OLED technology for the iPhone SE 4...»
«Rumors suggest that the ‌iPhone SE‌ will launch in 2024, with no refresh for the line planned for 2023»

With the iPhone and iPad price trend, we can expect a price between $ 600 and $ 700, twice the price of a Samsung A5x, with incomparably more advanced hardware (OLED display, great main cameras, twice the RAM and ROM, etc.).
The SE series looks like designed by the marketing department, to milk more money by Apple loyalists who kept the company alive in the dark times. Apple is exaggerating, acting like a monopolist, with no regulatory or ethical control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Asbow
iPhone SE - the SE stand for Stock Emptying.
If there’s still a bunch of old iPhone 8 chassis in Apple’s stock then the next iPhone SE will use that. If they’ve sold enough of those old iPhone 8 leftover bodies, Tim Apple will move on to the unused iPhone XR chassis and sell them off as “new design iPhone SE”.

Agree with the sentiment. That is how the SE now presents itself, but it’s probably less about surplus parts stock and more about extending the service life of the production tools and facilities, even if they have to be moved to lower volume locations. If you can double the profitable lifespan of the equipment then your return on investment is Next Level. Same filters down into all their suppliers who make the components. Everyone wins. Volume production 101 👍
 
Too much speculation (at Apple?), give us an Iphone Mini with iPad Air style Touch ID and basta!
I like the Touch ID and there is no price tag to convince me to change to Face ID.
But that would require courage
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filero
What do you mean it didn't work well. Look at the high demand of the 14 Pros and Pro Maxes. In the end, Apple gets more money. Seems like it worked perfectly well for Apple.

In the end, Apple prefer more people buying their $1000 phones. Why would Apple want more people buying their cheapest phone?
They need their entry level flagships to be successful too or else there’s no point in making them. When the 12 Mini and 13 Mini weren’t successful, they didn’t just keep making new Minis, they went with something they thought would sell more (the equally failed 14 Plus).

What they should do is make all the 15 models appealing, but still of course make the 15 Pro and Pro Max (and/or Ultra?) even more appealing. That means going back to chips that are at least of the same generation. The way they handled the 13 series was a good idea. A15 on the 13 and a slightly better A15 on 13 Pro and Pro Max.

Nobody wants last year’s chip in this year’s newest flagship phone. Not even SE owners deserve an old chip. They’ve so far gotten the latest chip. Otherwise, it’s just an old design with an old chip. At that point most people won’t be interested.
 
Just put a new chip into the iPhone 13 mini and call it a day. Or even the iPhone 12 mini as it is still fine, if you want to save a few bucks in the production.
 
Perhaps everything will turn out quite differently.
Of course, Apple needs a transmitter for its glasses.
And it has to be small (pocket) and fast (2x g.e.4K image information with usable fps).
With computing power that requires new battery dimensions.

That would be a really exciting step, since the leaker Jon Prosser quoted by MR is rather at home on the boring conservative side.
 
Right, but not the same size.
iPad Pro 11”
iPad Air 10.86”
iPad 10.86”

iPhone Pro 6.12”
iPhone 6.06”
iPhone SE4 6.06” (XR/11 screen size)

Moreover, the SE will be LCD since it will most likely be an XR/11 with some updated internals. So there will be even further differentiation.

Also, if we look at the legacy iPhone lineup which includes the still-available 12 and 13, there are already a dizzying array of ~6” iPhones. Adding one more is not going to change things much.
 
Yeah that tiering bs didn’t work out too well for Apple this year. Nobody cares about the non-Pros with last year’s chip. We might not see that nonsense stick around next year.
Next year, last year’s iPhone won’t have the same processor as the brand new one. That was a one time overlap in order to establish the new differentiation strategy (which, as has been pointed out, didn’t really hurt iPhone revenue - it merely shifted the product mix to the higher end model).

Expect the tiered processor strategy to continue. Whether or not that shifts sales back toward the non-Pro remains to be seen. But at any rate we should see the SE4 using a lower tier processor than the current generation iPhone Pro available at the time of its release.
 
Also, if we look at the legacy iPhone lineup which includes the still-available 12 and 13, there are already a dizzying array of ~6” iPhones. Adding one more is not going to change things much.
Which is why I believe having an SE at the same size would be a mistake.

iPad Pro 11”
iPad Air 10.86”
iPad 10.86”

iPhone Pro 6.12”
iPhone 6.06”
iPhone SE4 6.06” (XR/11 screen size)
A key difference is they market the iPads at different sizes (well at least two of them).

You might be right but I see Apple doing something more to differentiate the SE and screen size makes the biggest difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
A $120 increase from current starting price of an iPhone SE 3 is not going to happen. For $50 more, you can get a 1 year old (and better, IMO) former semi-flagship.

Agree. The SE will remain a sub-$500 phone.

By the time this comes out in (rumored) 2024, the iPhone 14 will probably be discounted to around $599 like how the iPhone 13 Mini is now.

Assuming it comes in spring of 2024 which is likely based on all prior iPhone SE release timeframes, you’re close, yeah. It would most likely be the iPhone 13 still in the lineup at $599 while the 14 will occupy the $699 slot.

The 13 Mini, like 12 Mini before it, will likely exit before its larger sibling. Perhaps there is a tiny outside shot that the 13 Mini stays instead, still at $599 rather than the 13 at that price. That would both remove the redundancy of two legacy iPhones with the same processor and keep a small iPhone around for another year. But I don’t think there’s much hope for this.

$449 or $479 is more likely than $549.

Agree. I think $449 is a good target to expect. Maybe they’ll even surprise us and keep it at $429. Some have suggested the SE3 could stick around (like the iPad 9 did) enabling the SE4 to move up. Possible, but I think it has run its course based on waning sales.
 
Huh? Whichever design they base it off, it will already have a front facing camera. All of Apple’s iPhones since the X have a front-facing camera in the notch.
They wouldn’t just put a XR/11 style front-facing camera array in SE4 and shut off cameras, or just be able to simply remove the Face ID components and leave the regular front facing selfie camera -That’s all added r&d to develop a new Face ID-less notch. Too costly in an SE.

A new low cost notch is only feasible if r&d is low enough or projected profit margins high enough for a Face ID-less notch on SE4

I’m putting my money on mid-tier and Pro iPhones 15 getting “2nd Gen Face ID” or at the very least seeing mid tier 15 move to the Dynamic Island notch.

This way Apple don’t have to spend r&d on new notch or Touch ID button and SE4 can just be a XR and get the 1st Gen notch with Face ID when it drops in Q1 2024 without threatening iPhone 15 sales.
 
Just put a new chip into the iPhone 13 mini and call it a day. Or even the iPhone 12 mini as it is still fine, if you want to save a few bucks in the production.

I think the 13 mini form will more likely be used for the following SE cycle rather than this next one coming. I would love to be wrong but I expect Apple to use each broad chassis type at least twice in order to extend its serviceable lifespan. In mass production with high initial tool-up costs, the more units you can produce on that platform the more money you will make. Especially as the costs of common components tends to go down while your long term efficiency goes up.

Obviously there’s a bunch of crossover with modular reused machinery and the re-engineering of the pseudo new device, but I wouldn’t mind betting that by doing this repeatedly, Apple could squeeze an extra 30% lifetime profit from each chassis type.

For the record I think 13 mini is peak iPhone, probably never to be repeated. Most likely it will be resurrected as a future SE, but I don’t think it will happen just yet. Not before Apple has completely exhausted the rounded edges and notch form factor. My money is on XR being the next SE donor 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimmy_uk and furou
Agree. I think $449 is a good target to expect. Maybe they’ll even surprise us and keep it at $429. Some have suggested the SE3 could stick around (like the iPad 9 did) enabling the SE4 to move up. Possible, but I think it has run its course based on waning sales.
I think it will be $499, with the 2022 SE remains at $429.
 
Agreed, the iPhone 8 form factor needs to go.
As long as they don’t do what they did with the iPad 10th gen, offering a new design at an higher cost. Most people in the market for an SE probably don’t care about design change, they probably care more about the price.

Also, as much as I like myself an all screen design, isn’t the TouchID button part of the appeal for the SE? Some people don’t want to get away from this button, or just prefer touchID as the authentification method. I feel like it would be a mistake to remove it given the purpose of this product
 
The current third-generation iPhone SE is Apple's smallest device, modeled after the iPhone 8. It measures in at 4.7 inches, and it is the only iPhone that includes thick bezels and a Touch ID Home button.
Incorrect!

The iPhone 13 mini is currently Apple's smallest device. It's still being made and sold. The 3rd Generation SE has the smallest screen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.