voice input is fine. but yes, many many people on the road cannot even deal with an on dash system.I imagine you think that Carplay should be banned in all 50 states then?![]()
voice input is fine. but yes, many many people on the road cannot even deal with an on dash system.I imagine you think that Carplay should be banned in all 50 states then?![]()
Even if you tack on 20% to the US prices it's still much cheaper than UK pricing.
$999 x 1.2 = $1,198.8 = £902
You swap your palm across the screen to take a screenshot.I cried a little when FaceId failed during the demo.
QUESTION:
How to make screenshot without home button?
I can see a lot of car accidents thanks to FaceID...
" swipe"You swap your palm across the screen to take a screenshot.
So you're judging an unreleased product how it won't be easy to use while driving?... which is clearly unsafe and in violation of every western countries laws for good reason. Good one.
Well part of the US didn't secede
I'm not judging in real use. I'm judging in common sense. The phone requires you to look at it to unlock.
No other iPhone requires that. Common sense tells me that will be difficult to do while driving. You don't have to look at any other iPhone to unlock it and get Siri driving instructions. On this one you will have to.
That in and of itself is a serious limitation and/or danger of the device considering how people currently use their iPhones.
If you think that people should change rather than the device, well than only fanboyism can explain that, not common sense.![]()
I'm not judging in real use. I'm judging in common sense. The phone requires you to look at it to unlock.
What are you talking about ? Reading messages, viewing photos, reading emails don't need a passcode after the phone has been unlocked!!! It's a security and privacy issue. Touch ID is a voluntary action by moving one's hand and placing a finger on the sensor (which you can refuse to do so) it's different than having someone pointing your phone at your face and unlock it.
You're right, but I was trying to say it's not appropriate to say their phone costs $999. Their tax isn't that high eitherEven if you tack on 20% to the US prices it's still much cheaper than UK pricing.
$999 x 1.2 = $1,198.8 = £902
Again, everyone wanted it to look like this:![]()
Instead we get a hindrance on screen ****ing come on.. this is your anniversary phone. It would've been flawless that way.
Didn't say zero bezel, I said got rid of notches. The aforementioned imagery demonstrates this perfectly:
![]()
The xiaomi mi mix 2, launched yesterday, is about as close as we get at present.
The CEO said they are working on 100% screen for future models.
Yep, a thin black strip at the bottom. Camera is located there as you say.Still, they have a bezel along the bottom with the camera in it right?
You're confusing your opinion on how you think the status bar will work with facts.I think you're confusing a matter of taste, with bad design. Everyone is different. does not apply when the alternative was full screen usage. There wouldn't be a situation possible where your content is at risk of being blocked. No one would EVER choose to have part of their content blocked. So these "other options" wouldn't be needed.
The status bar couldn't have gotten as much grief because it's NOT blocking anything! It could've been seen as bad design sure, but it would not effect the phones functionality IN ANY way. So I do not agree that it would've gotten just as much grief.
Won't it still be unlockable using a passcode?
Won't it still be unlockable using a passcode?
You're confusing your opinion on how you think the status bar will work with facts.