Boom. Exactly. If the story is right it appears many people are.....No need to fight over what is or what isnt expensive on here. Vote with your wallet and dont buy it people!
Boom. Exactly. If the story is right it appears many people are.....No need to fight over what is or what isnt expensive on here. Vote with your wallet and dont buy it people!
Galaxy S8 is available for £520 from Amazon UK. Not a clearance sale.Nope. That’s a clearance sale (why, I don’t know) with only “12 left in stock.” Can’t compare a steep clearance discount to an iPhone X at full retail. Not with any validity, anyway.
Bottom line: it’s misleading to claim that an S8 is about half the price of an iPhone X. It isn’t.
I have an iphone X (because my iphone 6+ finally died). I like Apple products but I am an investor and as such, I am only interested in Apple's sales. Now, every year, some analysts come out saying that Apple products are either delayed or not selling well. Most oQUOTE]
I have an iphone X (because my iphone 6+ finally died).
My point was that the note 8 does everything the iPhone X does plus a lot more and is cheaper. It's not that hard to comprehend; there is absolutely nothing the iPhone X has over the note unless you count the useless Animojis. Samsung even has the decency to throw in a fast charger in the box rather than advertising a feature you need to shell out more dollars for when you've already paid 1k for a device... Ridiculous.The post was justifying anything. That part is just your imagination.
To make it simpler, one poster said it works for what he needs it for.
You chimed in with all you can do with your Note 8.
So what?
Doesn't help OG Poster if you use case is not his/hers.
No justification, just simple fact.
Escape from your bubble, there is a much wider world.
Ah, I see. You'd prefer they charge $2,500 for the iPhone X then? That would really help keep their per unit margins "in tact". But wait, if they don't sell very many then their total profit is lower. Hmm... maybe the sales numbers and market pricing does matter! Perhaps overcharging the value of something isn't a great business strategy.
How dare anyone question Apple's impeccable pricing strategy!Ignored
How dare anyone question Apple's impeccable pricing strategy!
Come for me troll. You will look stupid without facts in 2018.[/QUOTE
Seems I'm losing the race to qualify for that adjective judging by your last post. It's absurd that you really believe the price of the phone has nothing to do with its sales.
It’s not all about price. If it were, Apple wouldn’t be selling 200+ million units per year, right?My point was that the note 8 does everything the iPhone X does plus a lot more and is cheaper. It's not that hard to comprehend; there is absolutely nothing the iPhone X has over the note unless you count the useless Animojis. Samsung even has the decency to throw in a fast charger in the box rather than advertising a feature you need to shell out more dollars for when you've already paid 1k for a device... Ridiculous.
Put the ID-touch back and get rid of the notch.
Case closed.
//P.S.
lower the price as well with 2-300 dollars
MR please, please, please, be consistent about whether you are talking about fiscal or calendar years.
FY 2018 began October 1.
CY 2018 began yesterday.
See the difference? Get the importance?
It’s not all about price. If it were, Apple wouldn’t be selling 200+ million units per year, right?
You can call them overpriced if you like, but things are worth exactly as much as people are willing to pay for them. If they were truly overpriced, people wouldn’t be buying them.
The iPhone X may be overpriced for you, but that isn’t relevant to the 30-40 million buyers who have already paid the price Apple’s charging. Or to the maybe 25-35 million who will also buy it over the next 9 months.
You've ignored everyone in this thread who disagreed with you. I guess you can't support anything you've said when your ideas are minimally challenged.Ignored
Hate facts, the Jedi must not. - JesusYou've ignored everyone in this thread who disagreed with you. I guess you can't support anything you've said when your ideas are minimally challenged.
Ironic for a JediZenMaster!
Lol at how many get so emotional and have tied their own self worth to a cell phone and consumer electronics company that doesn’t give one iota about them.
This Apple stuff is like a religion. I didn't even know. Almost like a political party...LOL at so many people who have no life and want to critique a purchase that someone makes with their hard earned money.
Boy oh boy you must think people who work 40 hours a week come from miles around to get your approval for a purchase.
As if your opinion actually is going to effect people and what they choose to buy. Worry about your own wallet.
This Apple stuff is like a religion. I didn't even know. Almost like a political party...
This Apple stuff is like a religion. I didn't even know. Almost like a political party...
Don’t mistake rumor for fact. Tens of millions less than who expected? Not Apple, that’s for sure.It is about the value proposition and it simply isn't there. The fact that some people are willing to pay for it doesn't mean the value is there, especially as this entire thread is about the fact that Apple likely sold tens of millions units less than expected. Remember when people were saying iPhone x would be sold out until 2018? Didn't happen. By your logic, Apple tripled the price and a few die hards still purchased it, the price would be justified. It is asinine for any consumer to pay a heavy premium for dated technology that doesn't even have gigabit LTE (4x4 MIMO).
I was referring to the original AppleThe iPhone was hardly the "only phone" 10 years ago... not sure where you got that idea from. In your "basic knowledge", did you discover that typically prices of technology go down, not up? So in most cases you see prices stay around the same point with each cycle as the products get more features and faster. Few are going to buy a iPhone X without AppleCare because of the insane prices to replace the back of it ($549). So you are paying over $1000. I think Apple is finding that most people are not willing to spend over $1000 for a phone.
This kind of hot take always makes me LOL
If your wealthy enough, the price becomes a non issue.
You may not be able to see/feel that because you may not be in that position.
You can't rationalize wasting $1000 on a vanity item like a cell phone. It's obscene.
And you just KNOW that there are people who bought this thing who are up to their eyeballs in credit card debt and have no savings.
Hell, I bet that is the target audience for iPhones these days.
[doublepost=1514965221][/doublepost]
Neither are 99% of the people buying this phone. Many are 20-somethings drowning in student debt and credit card debt who barely have a pot to piss in but feel the need to buy the latest and greatest iPhone every 2 years.
People have their priorities ass backwards these days and tech companies are happily suckering them like the suckers they are.