Get real. Comparing "Windows 7 vs. OS X" to "MS Paint vs. Photoshop" does nothing else but show that you're not very well connected to reality.
EDIT: I might need to take a look at that "multi-quote" thingy...![]()
A Mac has more features when you consider that you can run windows/linux and OS X on a mac.
And remind me where I was talking about Windows 7?
AdamA9 said:At the end of the day, if a PC and a Mac shared the same components, but the only differential was the operating system, would you chose the Windows because it was cheaper, and you'd think Apple was ripping you off? No you wouldn't. Its like choosing to use MS Paint over Photoshop
It's usually people that use childish attacks like "quit whining" who need to grow up and mature. Use logic to back up your points, not childish name calling and attacks.
What did I post that can even be construed as whining? I even have Macbook Pros because I can afford to blow cash on them. But that doesn't mean they're a good value.
If something isn't a good value, there is nothing wrong with acknowledging it as such. Unless you're Steve Jobs, there is no need for you to get so defensive about it.
I'm not saying that the Mac isn't worth getting if you have a lot of disposable income. I have many apple products.
They look nice. But I do think it's completely fair to say they're way overpriced though for the hardware you're actually getting. I just have a lot of money to waste so I don't really mind. But IMO, Macbook Pros by no means gives you good bang for your buck.
You can order the model with a higher resolution screen for $100 more. It does have bluetooth, I see the bluetooth icon on the one I have. And the graphics card it has is actually an upgrade in terms of performance to the 9400M+9600 (which is actually a smaller version of the 7600, a three year old card). Besides many Macbook Pros come with just the 9400M which is way worse.
Even assuming the Macbook Pro costs $500 to manufacture, it does seem like a huge markup to $2500.
Regardless, mainly I was hoping to hear from someone that actually has insider knowledge on how much it might be.
OP: IMHO, you are the worst kind of poster here at MR. You really come off borderline trolling, then get upset when someone points out an obvious flaw in your argument. Of course right up front we get a taste of your expertise on the subject, and by that I mean you pulling numbers out of your....well you know. If you post a topic on how Apple is "ripping us off" on a Mac forum what kind of response do you expect?
Right about here:
Granted, you might be comparing System 7 to Windows 95 here, but I assumed that you were talking about the current offerings from both vendors.
An honest one? The current MBPs are indeed a rip-off, it doesn't take a genius to see that - they're obviously end-of-life. Let's wait until we ge the next revision; depending on the features and speed bumps, Apple might finally get the MBP out of rip-off territory again![]()
A Virus Free Life is what turned me into a Mac User.
Have a look at all the trials and bloatware you get when you buy a PC, that's what I consider a rip off.
I don't feel ripped off. I have a 5 (going on 6) year old 15" Powerbook G4 (in my sig), that I paid $2100 for originally. It has been a great computer and got me through college with no problems. Even today it does your everyday tasks just fine. I just posted it to craigslist to sell it so I can purchase a new 13" MBP when Apple refreshes them. I sold my PB for $450! So for 5-6 years of fantastic, problem free use I sold it for nearly 1/4 of the original price. What other laptop can you say that about?![]()
I'm really trying to follow the argument here. If the current lineup is a ripoff, why would you consider buying it. Some of you tech guys, who are on the cutting edge of technology, are not living in the real world. Most people who buy computers don't care about some of these specs you are talking about. Granted it would be nice to have up to date hardware. However, most people want something that works, and works well. That's it. The funny part is most of you know that the minute Apple or any of these companies come out with updated hardware, there will be talk of newer technology.
What is considered a rip-off is in the eye of the beholder. I would pay a premium for a good computing experience. I could not care less about some of these specs y'all are talking about. Matter of fact, why don't you ask your friends, who are not computer geeks, if they know about the new technology. I guarantee you they don't know it.
I know a person who have spent over $5,000 to build their computer. I thought that was crazy. However, it's what he wanted. Just because you say it's a ripoff, doesn't mean its a ripoff to others. Some of you speak as if you are the definitive word on computing. It kinda borders on arrogance.
If Apple (or any other PC company) is not moving fast enough for you, go somewhere else.
I'm really trying to follow the argument here. If the current lineup is a ripoff, why would you consider buying it. Some of you tech guys, who are on the cutting edge of technology, are not living in the real world. Most people who buy computers don't care about some of these specs you are talking about. Granted it would be nice to have up to date hardware. However, most people want something that works, and works well. That's it. The funny part is most of you know that the minute Apple or any of these companies come out with updated hardware, there will be talk of newer technology.
What is considered a rip-off is in the eye of the beholder. I would pay a premium for a good computing experience. I could not care less about some of these specs y'all are talking about. Matter of fact, why don't you ask your friends, who are not computer geeks, if they know about the new technology. I guarantee you they don't know it.
I know a person who have spent over $5,000 to build their computer. I thought that was crazy. However, it's what he wanted. Just because you say it's a ripoff, doesn't mean its a ripoff to others. Some of you speak as if you are the definitive word on computing. It kinda borders on arrogance.
If Apple (or any other PC company) is not moving fast enough for you, go somewhere else.
All laptop manufacturers suffered from these poor quality products from nvidia and I believe seagate. Apple seems to be addressing the issue quite a bit more responsively than other companies like HP and Dell had. The 8600 is known to be a time bomb in all laptops, not just the MacBook Pro. And Apple reimbursing and replacing three year old harddrives is nothing short of generous. Harddrives wear out, but I personally have had my share of bad maxtor drives ever since seagate bought them.
You Are absolutely right!
Good computing experience is what most of the "normal" people want, and they not really care about how many cores the notebook has.
But in a forum you find a lot of "geek", with a "all-about-specs" attitude, and a lot of Apple-haters also, repeating again and again that Apple doesn't have top-notch hardware
If that was true then everybody should buy non-pro version of MacBook. It's the same OS and service and the specs do not matter. And yet some stupid people still buy Pro-s.