What was your user name before you were banned?
And I must admit, your post is pretty accurate.
I'm going to have to agree with you. It's pretty much accurate.
What was your user name before you were banned?
And I must admit, your post is pretty accurate.
The fact is, these forums are 75% full of fanboys and girls that go running to mods the instant someone says anything that makes the fanboy have to think too hard about what their motivation is for being here. It's a site for kindergartners that are chronologically much older, and can't handle any criticism on the internet but still want the satisfaction of spewing their own uninformed opinions on all things Apple, whether it's the stock price, Apple's marketing strategies, or a myriad of other things that they know next to nothing about.
I mean, good god, there's a whole thread on whether someone should be placed in "timeout" for calling someone a fanboy. Just the very idea of "timeout" on a message board is enough to make the average internet user throw up in disgust. Grow up.
What does it hurt? It may not "help" but lots of things aren't very helpful and they're not breaking rules or pleading for new ones and new ways to force us all to walk on eggshells.And again, how does calling someone a fanboy help anything?
If someone is "informed" they should be able to come up with actual arguments instead of resulting to name calling to try to shut someone up for having a different opinion (it doesn't matter how wrong or annoying that opinion might be).
What does it hurt? It may not "help" but lots of things aren't very helpful and they're not breaking rules or pleading for new ones and new ways to force us all to walk on eggshells.
Throwing the word fanboy around shouldn't a shortcut to thinking but I hardly think it's a big bad personal insult that should land someone in "time-out" unless they are REALLY being obnoxious about it. As I said before, it should depend largely on the context.
My two pennies anyway.
I'm wondering if calling someone a "fanboy" is considered an insult and should it be reported as such? If it's not I think it should be.
anjin-
I'm with you that if someone is "informed" they should be able to come up with actual arguments instead of resulting to name calling to try to shut someone up for having a different opinion (it doesn't matter how wrong or annoying that opinion might be). This is true no matter what name calling they resort to.
However, I assert that "fanboy" can be a descriptive term that is not always derogatory. However, if the only tool in ones debate toolbox, it is puerile and says more about the user than the recipient. This applies to whether you argue with "so", "am not/are too", "yo momma", "that's what she said", etc.
Unless someone is being abusive with language, tone, etc., one should not be put in time out or banned. The mods should allow civil debate, and only throw water on fighting dogs when blood is drawn.
Sticks and stone may break my bones, but words can...
"Fanboy" is sexist and ignores the large population of females who also will support a product, person or organization with the mindless determination of a zombie.
I never said anything about time outs, nor do I want new rules. Also I never said that any use of the word "fanboy" should be immediately moderated.
My point is that the way it is now even if someone is being really obnoxious about it (which is actually most of the times the word "fanboy" is used in the iPhone forums) most likely no one will report it because it's not considered an insult. I just wanted to bring attention to the fact that it can be used as an insult and when it is it should be treated as such.
If you read my last post (or any of my posts in this thread) you'll see that I never said that ALL use of the word "fanboy" should be moderated. I just wanted to bring to attention that it is used a lot as an insult and when it is it should be treated as such.
If you read my last post (or any of my posts in this thread) you'll see that I never said that ALL use of the word "fanboy" should be moderated. I just wanted to bring to attention that it is used a lot as an insult and when it is it should be treated as such.
It's the premise that any "insult" should result in "timeout" on an internet message board that has ended up making this a board of 75% fanboys/girls. That's also why you can't get very informed opinions here, or any kind of help that's worth anything at all. The collective knowledge of the macrumors forum community is far below that of the uncensored boards out there.
It's the premise that any "insult" should result in "timeout" on an internet message board that has ended up making this a board of 75% fanboys/girls. That's also why you can't get very informed opinions here, or any kind of help that's worth anything at all. The collective knowledge of the macrumors forum community is far below that of the uncensored boards out there.
And you, of course, are calling for more censorship. Hey, why not? That's what these boards are for... after all, that's why fanboys try to be mods.
MR has already become far too much of a random politically correct police state. </drama>
We need another reason for some people to sometimes get banned/TO'd?
I think everyone needs to lighten up and stop being so bloody sensitive.If "fanboy" is used as an insult shouldn't it be treated as any other insults?
Hear Hear!I think everyone needs to lighten up and stop being so bloody sensitive.
There's already enough you're not "allowed" to do and say.
I think everyone needs to lighten up and stop being so bloody sensitive.
There's already enough you're not "allowed" to do and say.
Which is exactly why - sadly - I find myself rapidly spending less and less time here.Over the years I have seen this place slowly slide into pretty much a school yard with plenty of bullies who throw their weight around.
You are pretty much dead meat if you happen to even slightly disagree with the gospel according to the MacRumors PC police.
If "fanboi" = insult, and insult = ban, how are you not saying it shouldn't be allowed?I never said it shouldn't be allowed.
If "fanboi" = insult, and insult = ban, how are you not saying it shouldn't be allowed?
So what you're saying is it's open to interpretation. Which means people get to pick and choose if/when it causes some poor delicate soul offence.When "fanboy" is used as an insult, it should be treated as any other insult, according to the rules. When it is used as any other word, it should be treated as any other word.
So what you're saying is it's open to interpretation. Which means people get to pick and choose if/when it causes some poor delicate soul offence.