Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Highly innovative electronic devices, sure, like the name and logo. They got nothing.

"Jobs Jobs Jobs" isn't taken yet, jump on it.
 
Bah, I'm going to create my own clothing line called Steve Steve Jobs Jobs and put a cutout in the middle name.
 
Oh boo hoo. Apple wants to patent and trademark everything but when someone beats them to the punch to something they didn’t think, they kick and scream.
 
Eh, I usually side with the little guys in a dispute against a giant like Apple, but I think in this case, this is a clear and cut ripoff of the customer, who will unmistakably associate this brand with Apple itself. If they need the "Steve Jobs" name and the clear ripoff of an Apple logo to sell their merchandise, it must not be all that great.
Didn't Apple do something like that with the name Apple?
[doublepost=1514479137][/doublepost]
Wow. Having been on the receiving end of a another company stealing my intellectual property, I feel like this is clearly a ripoff. I mean, would it have been granted if Jobs were still alive? I wonder if Steve's widow might personally go after them for the use of their name.
Steve Jobs, does not own that name. Just like I don't own mine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.