Uhh...Xbox and Playstation and PC all have crossplay with each other, and sometimes also with Nintendo Switch if the technology allows it.
Read what I wrote again. It's not up to Apple to make it easier for Android users. If your family/friends/coworkers have difficulty viewing your messages then tell them to either get an iPhone or deal with it.How about making it easier for iPhone users (like me) to be able to message Android users? (My co-workers and family)
Not sure if you’re being serious or not.I don't need it, so no thanks. I'll stick with iMessage. As far as Android, I don't deal with those peasants anyway. Easiest way to avoid the green bubbles.
Maybe Apple needs to stop accepting the billions Google's paying them?Maybe they need to stop paying to be the #1 search engine?![]()
They're all happy on Android though. So why should I suffer as an iPhone user when Apple is more than capable of adding RCS support to Messages? Kinda backwards to make your own platform less appealing and inferior to the competition isn't it?Read what I wrote again. It's not up to Apple to make it easier for Android users. If your family/friends/coworkers have difficulty viewing your messages then tell them to either get an iPhone or deal with it.
Then Apple should cut sms support if that's the case.If Google can make RCS fully encrypted from end to end, THEN Apple might be interested.
No it wouldn't. A lot of people switching from Android switch for iMessage. No incentive to switch if Android has it too.Wrong. This could kill Android or Google initiative to gain traction in owning a messaging platform for the future. As someone said in a message above... think, trojan horse.![]()
Google’s business is data, hence why they created and are using their weight to push a protocol that doesn’t interfere with their business model. Yes it’s time for SMS to die, but the answer being pushed by data collectors is…data collection.Yes because that is whats stopping it. SMS isn't encrypted, its just an excuse so you are locked in
It's time for RCS to be end-to-end encrypted.
This sounds like whining. Why doesn't Google just adopt iMessage instead?
Thought experiment: replace "Google" with "Facebook" or "WeChat". Maybe Apple's rejection of RCS is OK for users, especially given the wide availability of text+chat apps that don't rely on SMS/MMS. I also like minimizing how much information my cellular carrier gathers about me.
SMS is not going away; it still remains as the last fallback for when everything else fails.SMS is a simple function of cell connectivity. It uses spare space (ever wonder why the 160 character limit?) in a particular cell communication packet, and pretty much every network/carrier supports it.
Apple Messages app uses SMS as a fallback and for people who do not have iMessage.iMessage uses only data, regardless of how you get it (cell, wifi, tethering, etc.) and only requires Apple's back-end servers.
RCS requires only data, the message app relies on cell connectivity for SMS fallback just like Apple. A simple read of the last paragraph of this very post will tell you that "As of mid-2021, Google and all major carriers have swapped over to RCS" and not only have they swapped to RCS but they have all agreed to default to Google's implementation. And the beauty of Android is that you can download and install the Google Messages app yourself if it is not default.RCS requires not just cell connectivity but data as well, AND it requires the particular cell network that you're on to support it, too, as the carrier gets involved, and there are different versions and features and levels of support.
RCS is not troublesome to implement. They have all agreed to use Google's implementation. And SMS is the fallback.Seems to me like RCS would be the most troublesome of all of them. Additionally, one should always have fallback to SMS for when they're in places that don't have data service (roaming, carrier, weak signal, etc.)
Yes it is up to Apple. It's conforming to a revised global standard. Apple again is just beating their own drum, and only cares about their own walled garden. They're touting so much that they care about security but completely ignore using secure protocols to send to Android. It's RCS. It's here. Use it.Read what I wrote again. It's not up to Apple to make it easier for Android users. If your family/friends/coworkers have difficulty viewing your messages then tell them to either get an iPhone or deal with it.
But seriously, maybe Google should stop breaking texting on Android every year or two. And RCS is a total non-starter in most of the world because it’s not an over-the-top service, your features are limited to what your cell phone companies give you. Imagine not having the full texting experience because you are on a prepaid plan instead of a contract plan, for instance.
I still don't see how this is relevant. Apple will definitely not "let them walk". It's beneficial to Apple because $$$ and Google because $$$. Why would either side pull out of that for RCS?Leverage against Apple. IMO, Apple would let them walk, painful in the beginning but Apple would then introduce their own search platform (they’ve been building for years) or adopt DuckDuckGo / Bing and never look back. Google needs iOS search $$$$$ much much more than it needs RCS compatibility.
Indeed, Google can't "adopt iMessage" because of that.iMessage is a proprietary messaging protocol
Uhh...Xbox and Playstation and PC all have crossplay with each other, and sometimes also with Nintendo Switch if the technology allows it. Crossplay is industry standard with gaming now