Good for Apple if this is true. They have no obligation to support the software compatibility of a non-licensing competitor.
Would you apply the same to Microsoft?
Good for Apple if this is true. They have no obligation to support the software compatibility of a non-licensing competitor.
I agree completely. Interoperability is good for consumers.
Would you apply the same to Microsoft?
But Apple shouldnt be a bad citizen and intentionally break Pre syncing. Unless under-the-hood changes require it, its just bad behaviour.
....
Now instead of being looked at in a positive light Apple has alienated the Palm Pre crowd.![]()
In what way? Remember Microsoft is different than Apple - Microsoft is a convicted monopolist and Apple is not.
All three of them....
I would like a bigger house and lack the skills needed (and the permission of my association) to do so. That doesn't mean I an tear down the wall to my neighbors house (shared wall) and not expect them to be miffed at me.
Anybody realize the other treat to Apple from Palm isn't just using iTunes, but the device 2 year COST!:
![]()
for more, see:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/wireds-smart-guide-for-know-your-smartphones/
I'm not saying give them full access to everything, but let them sync the basics like songs & podcasts.
Apple already lets other devices sync, but the manufacturer of the device must write a compatible driver, which needs to be installed on PCs and Macs alike. Apple is basically biatch-slapping a device manufacturer who is NOT following the rules. Palm (w/washed up ex-Apple folks) has been taking a short cut and trying to skip the driver installation.
Pre just bought themselves time to write the driver. I am sure they will do the right thing soon. They just wanted the early "it's easy!" press and reduce the load on their developers until the initial deployment settled down a little.
Its a Mac forum...the answer you will get is "you pay the price for quality." or something of that nature.
I don't understand people defending Palm over this.
1. Palm never really advertise iTunes syncing in the first place. It's just a "wink wink nod nod" sort of thing. They should know better that it will be broken by Apple sooner or later.
2. iTunes is not required to transfer music to the Pre in the first place. Simply drag-n-drop. If Palm wasn't so lazy, they could've made things much better by partnering with Songbird or something.
Customers should blame Palm for being lazy. There are other good jukebox software out there. Piggybacking iTunes is not necessary.
At present.In what way? Remember Microsoft is different than Apple - Microsoft is a convicted monopolist and Apple is not.
In some aspects of their business, it is debatable if Apple is not approaching or is a monopoly. Not yet tested, perhaps soon.
That's a pretty good analogy, actually.
I might revise it to say, you want to help yourself to the food in your neighbor's kitchen, but instead of making plans for dinner, maybe bringing a side dish of your own, and being welcomed through their front door... you cut a hole in the shared wall and raid the fridge.
oh Booooo! If this is true then Apple is going about things all wrong. They should encourage the Pre and any other phone or mp3 player to sync through iTunes. More sales for iTunes songs & movies plus more positive exposure for Apple.
I'm not saying give them full access to everything, but let them sync the basics like songs & podcasts.
Now instead of being looked at in a positive light Apple has alienated the Palm Pre crowd.![]()
To all of you complaining and whining and defending Apple, what if Apple said that only their keyboards and mice would work with Mac? What if they said that only the $900 Cinema Display would work with a Mac? Would you be defending them?
Very good work Apple.
Palm, just make your own synching app. If they can build a phone OS they can build a synch app.