Whiners that want prosper factual numbers not repeat I’ve % without base numbers to make relevance understandable.
This bar graph is a joke! Like % of what number specifically? Can you do the math with only 1 value in an equation? No.
Worse than what exactly? 3% of what total number?
This article nor the mention in the graph by CIRP states the total number. So this “3%” could be amazing vs terrible - without the total number nobody knows. No link to CIRP’s data as well ah time of article posting that I’m commenting on at this moment.
Take note the iPhone SE 3 production was cut in 6 wks of release. 6 wks lol.
What happened to factual numbers vs inferring what value 3% actually holds? Hmmm.
Also nobody in their right mind thought pandemic affected mini sales when the past two years people purchased larger phones as they’re not travelling nor exercising outside as much. Sorry your statement is opposite of reality. Unless you meant what I’m stating. Also this is USA percentage only not global.
Just remember the iPhone SE 3 production was officially cut in 6wks of release lol. That’s shows a mistake in assessing just how cheap the iPhone should go. Anyone recall the iPhone 5C when the 5S was launch how terrible that was?! Reiterating an old design too long (4yrs running from the SE 2 launch) is an insult to consumers.
Right now I feel Apple is in a hypocritical moment: touting better security of FaceID yet holding onto TouchID in 1 iPhone and in 2 iPads and ok 4 MBPs with 2 external keyboards.
Watch and see here the FUD jumping on the machine without actual factual data just relevance without a base number of that that 3% represents.
Again at time of my post this article does NOT directly link CIRPs data nor state the total current sales numbers of all iPhones this quarter in the USA but states 3% of what exactly? 10 million? 30 million? 40 million? That’s a big difference.