The headphone jack is dying. It won't be long before more Android flagship ditch it just as Pixel did. If you wait long enough your only options will be lower tier phones.Sarcasm
Maybe in your eyes but many are not happy with Apple's direction. Apple's decisions are impacting how users want to use their phone. Many feel Apple is reducing functionality.
I won't say I will never buy Apple's flagship phone again but Apple's choices has stopped me from my l upgrade cycle. 5, 5s, 6s then when Apple removed the jack I stopped buying. I will ride the 6s as long as I can and when it can't function I will see if Apple is still selling a product I want to use.
Love the free market.
Touch ID was one of your favorite features
It was pretty slick that they had a backup phone there just in case.The notch looks crap in MANY people's opinion - have a look at "the internet". It's a chunk out of a screen, it's not elegant.
Again, the reason for the fail is what Apple said it was, they wouldn't openly say if failed either (remember antenna bands and "holding it wrong"?) - but we only have their word for that. You'd think such a slick organisation would rehearse these things... They probably did right? But upon the first showing to the world Apple couldn't unlock their own phone with their great new tech - fail. Did Craig ever go back to that phone in the demo, use a passkey and then demonstrate it ACTUALLY working? Or just use his back-up phone?
I’m not quite sure I buy this rumor, but if it’s true it basically would take the place of an 8S & 8S plus. With FaceID and a notch, and a diagonal of 5”, it would be as narrow as an SE, just taller if the new 19.5:9 aspect ratio.There's a rumor, confirmed by the Wall St. Journal, that they're going to have 3 phones next year. Two OLED models, one in 5.8" and one in 6.46". Essentially, the iPhone X and a Plus version of it. The 3rd phone is supposed to be a 5" LCD phone using a new type of LCD technology called Full Active LCD by Japan display. Supposedly Full Active LCD uses a tighter weave in the electronics of the LCD screen allowing for a closer to the bezel display than traditional LCD technology. That phone is supposed to be around $700 or so. I'm sure the SE model will still be retained with a minor upgrade, probably just to the processor.
What did they take away when they added Touch ID?
Says the guy that hasn't even tried it.Sometimes technology advances because we want to see if we can do it instead of sometimes a better way or the “safer way”.
I remember when Touch ID came out and I thought, “So what..are we getting too lazy to punch in a four code number to unlock? Remember before it was a longer number to punch in, but that was too much to do for most. Plus, now Apple and whomever has your finger prints in exchange for convienence. Yes...they do have it, give me a Break with “just stays on your phone..”
Once the technology was worked out it seems to be a good thing and I actually like now Touch ID.
But...facial ID...then eye ID...no thanks. That is my limit. If that becomes the standard, I might just get rid of my smartphone all together. I cannot believe that thought entered my mind, being a tech enthusiast.
Apple and the rest of the industry is working on making their products a “must have” to live instead of a tool or option to make your live a little better. It is becoming clear their objective. People will say, “then just don’t buy..” but the way the world is going, it is making it difficult “not to have” a smart phone.
Requiring less precision from the user. I've seen less sophisticated iPhone users, like my mother, make two or three attempts to unlock their phone, and their frustration is palpable. Unlocking by simply looking at the screen is the ultimate "It Just Works" hallmark of Apple affordances.The question remains, from identification and ease of use perspective, why is FaceID better than TouchID?
Sometimes technology advances because we want to see if we can do it instead of sometimes a better way or the “safer way”.
I remember when Touch ID came out and I thought, “So what..are we getting too lazy to punch in a four code number to unlock? Remember before it was a longer number to punch in, but that was too much to do for most. Plus, now Apple and whomever has your finger prints in exchange for convienence. Yes...they do have it, give me a Break with “just stays on your phone..”
The SE is the lowest cost phone, and will continue to be around $349 with a small spec refresh expected in spring 2018.So Apple will add faceid to another 2 iphones next year. Edge to edge iphone SE and that 6.4" iphone
It's one of mine too but I'll get used to FaceID just fine.TouchID is one of my favorite features.
They know how well it works; you think they want 80 million pissed off customers this year?They do make mistakes every now and then, like everyone else, no reason to repeat over and over examples of this. Why all this blind confidence for a company ?
You can go into a Samsung store and try it,
Thanks for proving my point about you not being very bright and all. Kudos.
Maybe in your eyes but many are not happy with Apple's direction.
The removal of somethings is not progress, its regression.
Good. One less person to have to fight with to get my hands on an already limited supply of iPhones.Looks like my iPhone 7 Plus will be the LAST iPhone I ever buy.
Its difficult to not have an ID or a bank account or a computer. For many people their phone is the computer they use the most.Sometimes technology advances because we want to see if we can do it instead of sometimes a better way or the “safer way”.
I remember when Touch ID came out and I thought, “So what..are we getting too lazy to punch in a four code number to unlock? Remember before it was a longer number to punch in, but that was too much to do for most. Plus, now Apple and whomever has your finger prints in exchange for convienence. Yes...they do have it, give me a Break with “just stays on your phone..”
Once the technology was worked out it seems to be a good thing and I actually like now Touch ID.
But...facial ID...then eye ID...no thanks. That is my limit. If that becomes the standard, I might just get rid of my smartphone all together. I cannot believe that thought entered my mind, being a tech enthusiast.
Apple and the rest of the industry is working on making their products a “must have” to live instead of a tool or option to make your live a little better. It is becoming clear their objective. People will say, “then just don’t buy..” but the way the world is going, it is making it difficult “not to have” a smart phone.
Good. One less person to have to fight with to get my hands on an already limited supply of iPhones.
A notch or a forehead, take your pick... there are 8 sensors up there, they gotta go somewhere.But that dumb notch...
I have no problem with criticism. Nonsense though is another thing entirely...and that's what you're spewing.Correct, I shouldn't bring myself down to your level of name-calling really. But all you're showing is that you're blind to any criticism of your favourite brand, which is a bit sad.
Apple's tech is quite different than Samsung's, so I wouldn't make assumptions based on what Samsung did. In my experience, Samsung rushes technologies to the market, with low regard to details and quality. So, thanks for the advice, but no, I won't be making any judgements of Face ID based on what Samsung did. Just like I didn't presume anything about Touch ID based on fingerprint scanners from other phones at the time.