Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ehem....There is evidence. Right here. Us saying we want it is evidence... but since you don't care about that...

There is no evidence that people don't want it either.

The SE was larger than many of us wanted. Again, that doesn't matter because the reason we don't have one of these devices is because Apple and these other companies can't make the phone. They can't do it and that's why the don't sell it. It has very little to do with demand and more to do with the fact that it's easier to make a large device than it is to make a small one.

A few people saying they want something on a tech forum is not evidence. I want things too. Is that evidence that Apple should make them?

There is plenty of evidence that not enough people want it. The SE would have sold better when it was released and was spec-equal, more or less, to the 6S. Android phone manufacturers would be producing smaller phones if people wanted them. Apple insisted for a long time that people didn't want bigger phones and stuck to the smaller iPhone form factor while Samsung and other Android manufacturers pushed for larger screen sizes. Apple was wrong. When the larger 6 launched, it blew everything else away.

There's no doubt that some people want a smaller phone, but clearly not enough for ANY phone manufacturer to go after that market. I also think you're right about physical size to some extent. Squeezing the iPhone XS into an SE-sized body would be quite an engineering marvel. I'm not sure they can do it.
[doublepost=1537157407][/doublepost]
Marzipan is about letting iOS apps run on the Mac. I wouldn't read anything more into that.

I disagree. There's a lot more to read into it. The goal is a common codebase for apps. Once that happens, it doesn't matter if the target machine runs iOS or MacOS, is powered by an A-series chip or an Intel chip. MacOS will die in the next ten years. iOS with a MacOS UI will replace it.
 
I got the X last year at a sizeable cost, I as many others have also said can not afford another £1000+ when we still have a serviceable device. Maybe iPhone 11 or 12 in another year and they could get a sale then.
 
Hopefully this doesn't lead to discontinuation of a 5.8 inch sized phone in a couple years. Some of us still prefer a one handed phone!
 
many people seem to be assuming that Apple is even trying to get X Code to run on an iPad. they might be shocked when it turns out that Apple isn't and isn't planning to

I made it as a neutral comment. A side bar. I'd welcome it, but honestly I don't have no dog in the fight. With 5G coming down the pike, I'd be surprise if I wasn't using a cloud service for iOS development in the next five years.
 
Funny, with all the drivel I’m reading I’m reminded of articles last year. After the X (that’s Ten for anyone who can’t read) went on sale, all we heard for months was that sales were far below expectations. WRONG!!! It wasn’t only the best selling iPhone ever, it was the best selling smartphone ever. It’s hilarious to read the same garbage every year and every year anti-Apple people repeat it hoping it’ll be true this time. Guess what. It won’t. It’ll be the best selling smartphone again.

THANK YOU! It’s amazing reading some of these comments lmao. This forum is notttttt a measure of Apple’s success or lack there of.

Apple knows what they’re doing and this will be another record setting holiday season. They’re gonna sell boatloads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdriftmeyer
A few people saying they want something on a tech forum is not evidence. I want things too. Is that evidence that Apple should make them?

There is plenty of evidence that not enough people want it. The SE would have sold better when it was released and was spec-equal, more or less, to the 6S. Android phone manufacturers would be producing smaller phones if people wanted them. Apple insisted for a long time that people didn't want bigger phones and stuck to the smaller iPhone form factor while Samsung and other Android manufacturers pushed for larger screen sizes. Apple was wrong. When the larger 6 launched, it blew everything else away.

There's no doubt that some people want a smaller phone, but clearly not enough for ANY phone manufacturer to go after that market. I also think you're right about physical size to some extent. Squeezing the iPhone XS into an SE-sized body would be quite an engineering marvel. I'm not sure they can do it.
[doublepost=1537157407][/doublepost]

I disagree. There's a lot more to read into it. The goal is a common codebase for apps. Once that happens, it doesn't matter if the target machine runs iOS or MacOS, is powered by an A-series chip or an Intel chip. MacOS will die in the next ten years. iOS with a MacOS UI will replace it.

"MacOS will die in the next ten years. iOS with a MacOS UI will replace it"

For that to happen Pro app developers like Apple, Adobe, Autodesk, etc., will have to port their software over to Marzipan. With the exception of Apple, I am not sure that they will and if they do it will be one hell of a long undertaking.
 
Went from 7+ to the X. I think 5.8” is the perfect size that balances single hand usability and screen real estate. Held a 7+ the other day and it felt like an iPad mini lol. I think Apple knocked it out of the park with the X. I feel like I have a phone that doesn’t need to be upgraded after a year for once. I probably won’t buy another phone until they get rid of the notch
Going from a 7+ to the Xs, looking forward to one handed use again (without the phone nearly slipping out of my hands). As for notch removal, you may be waiting quite some time. I hope I'm wrong though.
 
If Apple really wants to position the Xr as the entry-level 2018 iPhone and an upgrade from last year's 8, it should be priced comparably and at the price point where it would offer the best value. Similarly, last year's iPhone 8 should have been priced comparably to the iPhone 7. But instead, the two price increases combine to $100, or the price of the starting Plus model in 2015 now attached to the entry-level / non-Plus iPhone, the Xr.

To make matters worse, Apple positioned the Xr as a replacement for last year's non-Plus and Plus models both. There is no 2018 Plus model at a comparable price to last year's Plus model, or even $50 higher. Hence the price for Plus owners simply wanting comparable hardware jumps all the way from $799 to the $1,099 Xs Max.

iPhone 6s Plus owners who purchased at full price in 2015 are going to be paying no less in 2018 for lower PPI / no 3D Touch, or $350 more for the Xs Max. This isn't an insignificant sum and has definitely caused me to reconsider upgrading my 6s Plus at all this year.
The XR is a fusion of regular/Plus and X features. Apple chose the trade offs it thought would make the model as appealing as possible to the widest number of people. Not everyone will be satisfied with the result; Apple knew this going in.

Those who want dual cameras are in the same situation as you, i.e. having to go to the XS series to get a (formerly) Plus feature. That’s the way Apple decided to segment it, and I’m sure it was a deliberate move to “feature-pull” users to the more expensive XS series.

But they also pushed the large screen and TrueDepth/FaceID of the X down to the $749 XR. So some who might have gone with an XS this year will be content to buy the XR.

You win some, you lose some. For some, the $699 8 Plus is an attractive option. But to address your opening sentence, the XR is the 2018 entry level device, and it is an upgrade (overall) from the 8. There’s no point in continuing to compare the pricing to 2014, especially with the increase in the storage tiers and the high prices of NAND storage. Sure the 6 was $649 but that was for 16GB; the 64GB model was $749—the same price as the XR today.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jtinch
"MacOS will die in the next ten years. iOS with a MacOS UI will replace it"

For that to happen Pro app developers like Apple, Adobe, Autodesk, etc., will have to port their software over to Marzipan. With the exception of Apple, I am not sure that they will and if they do it will be one hell of a long undertaking.

They will. Because marzipan doesn’t just give them the mac customer base, but also the iOS customer base, which is, by dollars spent on apps, by far the biggest game in town.
 
With a six year support plan it’s quite clear Apple are playing the long game here.

I agree. The fact that the hardware of all three new models is so similar makes me think they've got some special stuff planned on the horizon and they're making sure a large proportion of devices are ready to handle it.

I fully expect to only upgrade my iPhone every 3 years now with the quality of the hardware. My last update was 3 years ago (iPhone 6s) but before that it was always every two years. This will help with their environmental kudos too - only a moron (or an environmental vandal) would upgrade their phone every year.
 
"MacOS will die in the next ten years. iOS with a MacOS UI will replace it"

For that to happen Pro app developers like Apple, Adobe, Autodesk, etc., will have to port their software over to Marzipan. With the exception of Apple, I am not sure that they will and if they do it will be one hell of a long undertaking.

People said the same about Classic to OS X. Adobe has already embraced iOS. So has Microsoft. There are really only two "Pro" app developers that matter, Adobe and Microsoft. Autodesk isn't really taken seriously on the Mac. Apple will no doubt make all of their own apps Marzipan-compliant.

I think the writing is on the wall for OS X. Once Apple's own chips can deliver the necessary performance and the majority of Mac and iOS apps are Marzipan-compliant, OS X dies.
 
They will. Because marzipan doesn’t just give them the mac customer base, but also the iOS customer base, which is, by dollars spent on apps, by far the biggest game in town.

It's the getting here to there problem though. Currently, those apps have no business on an iOS devise.
 
True, but that doesn't mean 326 PPI has no impact on user experience or value. Just as the average user probably has no idea what 5400 RPM means, or how slow their newly-purchased $1,299 iMac is if they don't have a Mac with an SSD to compare it to.
I think my point was that the Xr Retina display is “good enough” for most folks. It’s over 300, which was always Apple’s number for phone class retina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smulji and jtinch
I got the X last year at a sizeable cost, I as many others have also said can not afford another £1000+ when we still have a serviceable device. Maybe iPhone 11 or 12 in another year and they could get a sale then.
And I think Apple is OK with that. The Xs Max appeals to Plus owners who didn’t bite on the X last year. The Watch is a meaningful upgrade. The Xs is geared to 6s and 7 owners who didn’t upgrade last year. The Xr is geared toward 6s and 7 owners who can’t justifiy a $1000 phone.
 
“Apple has already seen stagnating demand. On an annual basis, it's sold about the same number of phones in each of the last four years. In fact, the number of phones it sold in the year-long period that ended in June was 2% fewer than the number it sold in the same period that ended in June 2015.”

https://www.businessinsider.com/app...stream-consumers-2018-9?utm_source=reddit.com

I think it’s clear why Apple is going with higher priced phones, though this phenomenon of slowing smartphone growth is by no means exclusive to Apple. If they want to continue steadily increasing their profits, they also have to increase the price when sales are plateauing. Of course, this has the effect of reinforcing the plateauing sales as consumers seek longevity out of more and more expensive devices.

I considered my 6 a one-handed phone, idk maybe I'm the odd one out

The standard 6 is for many people because it’s only got a 4.7” screen on it. Try comfortably reaching the opposing top corner of the bezel on a 6 though and you have what it would be like trying do so on a X or Xs. Most people probably can’t do it without shifting their natural grip on the phone.
 
Last edited:
On the flip side, I have the Series 3 and the Series 4 is a huge upgrade for me. The larger screen with more complications, the new back which now allows me to utilize all the heart and health features which were previously blocked by my tattoo’s, plus the thinner design makes this a no brainer for me.
I have the s3 and think the s4 is a total snooze. If you’re someone who actually needs an EKG or fall detection, then yeah. For the rest of us, it’s the same device with a bigger screen (and jacked up prices). Hugely disappointing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.