Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I like the idea of having a Plus model, but I don't like that it's basically the same phone as the 13. Apparently the 14 has ProMotion "disabled", meaning it's perfectly capable of it. So why can't it just be an option we can turn on or off? It's a deliberately nerfed phone and that doesn't inspire me to want it.
 
I was one of those people who pre-ordered Friday, but as part of the upgrade process with AT&T. Expected ship date is not until October 21 :/
 
This is Apple's Nokia moment. They must flip and fold or they will fade. That's where the wow factor is these days.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: xpxp2002
Someone somewhat disagrees:

New Apple iPhones and Apple Watches are off to impressive start: JPMorgan​


The U.S. stock market in general is up quite a bit over the past 5 days, so if anything Apple's stock increase is tied more to that than their new products. Not arguing with you, just the implied correlation in the article.
 
If most of is don't buy new iphones this year, we can make an impact.
Don’t include me in the “most of us”.
If it Bombs then perhaps they'll get the idea that not everyone wants a huge phone, not everyone has huge pockets and a huge wallet, they need to cater for a smaller niche market for the mini, same for the ipad mini, the accountants might say the sales are lacklustre but what they don't know is that probabley everyone who wanted a mini actually bought one, so in fact it satisfied the demand and sold out ... ie a success !
It’s not going to bomb, imo.
I buy an iPhone every couple of years (5-6 ideally). I bought an XR in early 2019, which means I'd buy an iPhone 16 or so in early 2025. Lack of RAM is probably the biggest problem at that point.

I cannot believe Apple is oblivious to the fact that the disposable income of most parts of the iPhone-buying population is both limited and shrinking, while at the same time, Apple is trying to squeeze every more money out of their use-base by differentiating and expanding their product lineup for both physical and non-physical products.

2007: Desktop, Notebook, Phone (and iPod, if you want)
2022: Desktop, Notebook, Phone, Pad, various headphones, TV-player, speakers, Watches, Displays...

At this rate, I doubt anybody has money left once they finally release the car.
Planning a new phone takes years. There comes a point in time apple cannot pivot. And nobody could have seen this tsunami coming. However, the proof of the pudding is in the financials.
Glad it failed. Apple should never roll out a lackluster update like that again. If they didn’t introduce the dynamic island I’d find it hard to believe that many would’ve upgraded to the pros as well this year
What failed? Proof?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StumpJumper
iPhone 14 Pro Mini
iPhone 14 Pro
iPhone 14 Pro Max

That's all we needed, just cut the 14/14 Plus with old chips crab.
That would be a great way for Apple to reduce sales volumes, because just about nobody wants a mini sized iPhone. The few geeks that hang out here don't count.


March quarter 2022:

iPhone 13: 38%
iPhone 13 Pro + Max: 30%
iPhone 13 mini: 3% <-- Ouch!

Total: 71% of iPhones sold in that quarter were from the iPhone 13 series. The other 29% were other models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StumpJumper
That's not a Pro mini. That's just the 13 mini with USB-C.

I specifically want the Pro mini for the telephoto lens and ProMotion. The battery life of the 13 mini was fine. I'd forego the useless ultrawide camera lens in order to fit the telephoto lens in its place, but anything less is too much of a compromise.
Better wait for the new 48Mp module review, but may be this kind of hardware could mitigate this type of limitation.
It will be interesting to compare the tele perf at 2x with the 12pro.
 
That would be a great way for Apple to reduce sales volumes, because just about nobody wants a mini sized iPhone. The few geeks that hang out here don't count.


March quarter 2022:

iPhone 13: 38%
iPhone 13 Pro + Max: 30%
iPhone 13 mini: 3% <-- Ouch!

Total: 71% of iPhones sold in that quarter were from the iPhone 13 series. The other 29% were other models.

That's quite unfair, because the mini lineup also has to compete with the iPhone SE which is much cheaper and has similar size/weight benefits. Without the SE lineup I'm sure the minis would sell a lot more.
 
I'm curious how much it's the $ vs £/€ and how much it's the chinese yuan and/or taiwanese dollar where the phones/main components are built.

Looks like the dollar is up (where the phones remain the same - maybe more money for Apple), but also the far eastern currencies are up vs european ones (maybe less money for Apple or roughly the same with a lot of R&D in the US, not just far east manufacturing).
 
You can justify it because the Euro is weaker and the USD is stronger. Causes prices to rise
And what happened when Euro had 20 or 30% more value than dollar? It’s not an excuse.
Same thing here in France. 13 mini still 809 euros. I'm heading to the USA in the Spring. I'll buy one there for about 650 dollars, tax included. Maybe it'll even be less expensive by then. In the meantime my 2020 SE is doing the job.
Think that you won’t have ANY type of warranty covered in France.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xand&Roby
Many points about inflation etc. are true but somehow I still have a feeling that the headlines after the next couple of earning calls will still be "Apple had another blockbuster quarter".
We‘ll see about that. Apple has had (relatively) disappointing financial results before.
Apple actually hiked prices by about 10% outside US in order to please it’s biggest market, America.

Yes, some of the non-US price hike is inflation. But deducting those, there’s still about 10% left that’s just a regular price hike with no war to blame.
They didn’t hike the prices by 10%. Overseas prices have always higher than US prices by a bit less than 10 or so.
I can't believe how many forum members are still making the case for the iPhone Mini Pro in this thread. Such a device would have sold even worse than the failed iPhone Mini.
Agree. And I‘m even saying this as a fan of the mini form factor. Just don‘t gimp it, compared to the „regular“ bigger-size sibling, and I‘m ok with it.
Apple is trying to squeeze every more money out of their use-base by differentiating and expanding their product lineup for both physical and non-physical products.

2007: Desktop, Notebook, Phone (and iPod, if you want)
2022: Desktop, Notebook, Phone, Pad, various headphones, TV-player, speakers, Watches, Displays...

At this rate, I doubt anybody has money left once they finally release the car.
Forgot about the virtual reality headset ;)
Everyone that is not in the USA and complains about the price difference please don't get upset at Apple. Get upset at whatever made the Euro lose value on the Dollar.
True - though on the other hand, their lack of product differentiation between last year’s 13 and this year’s 14 models feels a bit like adding insult to injury. If the 14 had great new features and better performance compared to the 13, it may have softened the perception of the price hike.
 
And what happened when Euro had 20 or 30% more value than dollar? It’s not an excuse.
What happened? European iPhones were a few (between 5 and 10) percent more expensive than in the US. After adjusting for local taxes.

Just the same as today.
 
That's quite unfair, because the mini lineup also has to compete with the iPhone SE which is much cheaper and has similar size/weight benefits. Without the SE lineup I'm sure the minis would sell a lot more.
Yes, it's because the SE was much, much cheaper than the mini. A hypothetical mini Pro would be even more expensive than the previous mini. Almost nobody wants to pay that kind of money for a mini sized screen. They would not gain significant sales of the mini until they dropped pricing.

The mini was a flat out failure, which a lot of people predicted up front when they saw the pricing.
 
The iPhone 14 Plus 512GB is 1199 vs the iPhone 14 Pro Max 512GB at 1399 (US Store) 200 more isn't much of a climb for an iPhone with a lot more features.
And I'm still convinced they purposely delayed Plus so people would go for Max. I can't find a single Max in a 100mi radius but can find any of other three even if they aren't the exact color and capacity
 
People buying the 14 standard model don’t need a bigger or smaller size. I think the plus was destined to fail because if you wanted something bigger and a few more $$ to spare, just go for the pro max. I think they would have been better off making a 14 mini, because while most people will opt for the standard size, some will want the mini size, and there a a good handful of pro users who buy a mini as a spare phone. I have 2 mini’s a 12 and 13 I bought for my boys, they don’t need any bigger and its much more affordable. Who is the plus for exactly?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
A) Think this is just a consequence of keeping the non-Pro phones horribly mediocre to push everyone they can to buy the Pro.
B) The Mini was a less expensive phone, it's ok to sell less the pricier one instead on cannibalising the main model with a cheaper one.
And B is exactly why they are delayng Plus. If it would have launched with Max, it would have sucked away sales. The regular 14 isn't going to steal anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cicalinarrot
Yes, it's because the SE was much, much cheaper than the mini. A hypothetical mini Pro would be even more expensive than the previous mini. Almost nobody wants to pay that kind of money for a mini sized screen. They would not gain significant sales of the mini until they dropped pricing.

The mini was a flat out failure, which a lot of people predicted up front when they saw the pricing.

Yes, I agree that a mini pro wouldn't work at all. Mini users just want a small and light, one hand phone with good enough performance for a smooth experience. My point anyway was that the SE series cannibalized the sales of the mini so they can't be totally compared with the other variants.
 
I'll keep banging this drum that Apple determined that the mini was a failure without releasing a pro version of it. Who knows how sales might have been had they done so.
 
  • Love
Reactions: arkitect
The U.S. stock market in general is up quite a bit over the past 5 days, so if anything Apple's stock increase is tied more to that than their new products. Not arguing with you, just the implied correlation in the article.
Apple is up more than the S&P today.
 
Except the Pros are getting just OK sales, again because of the cost, and this is during the early adopter period.
In the US the Max is better than OK, unless they are purposely limiting supply. I can't find any Maxes in a large radius. I can find the other three at least in some form.
 
I'll keep banging this drum that Apple determined that the mini was a failure without releasing a pro version of it. Who knows how sales might have been had they done so.
The battery life would have been worse. The 12 mini got panned for its battery life. Things got better with the 13 mini, but still not enough to drive sales.
 
In the US the Max is better than OK, unless they are purposely limiting supply. I can't find any Maxes in a large radius. I can find the other three at least in some form.
It's OK to good, but not amazing, supposedly. It's likely supply constrained.

And I'm still convinced they purposely delayed Plus so people would go for Max. I can't find a single Max in a 100mi radius but can find any of other three even if they aren't the exact color and capacity
The Max is available at my local Apple Store in Toronto for pickup this Friday, Sept. 16, albeit only in the 1 TB size.

I won't be ordering until mid-October though, since that's when my credit card will start providing insurance on cell phones.
 
Yes, I agree that a mini pro wouldn't work at all. Mini users just want a small and light, one hand phone with good enough performance for a smooth experience. My point anyway was that the SE series cannibalized the sales of the mini so they can't be totally compared with the other variants.
Not even a little true. In our household we have 1 mini amongst 4 users. We'd have 3 (and maybe 4) if the mini were Pro (specifically in terms of the cameras).
 
The battery life would have been worse. The 12 mini got panned for its battery life. Things got better with the 13 mini, but still not enough to drive sales.
In our household the battery wasn't at all a reason why only 1/4 of us have the mini. It was the cameras.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.