What is the failure rate of the existing physical buttons?
I can’t imagine it being very high.
I can’t imagine it being very high.
I don’t believe Apple’s force sensors need electric conductivity in the button to work. The only reason it was needed on the home button was to recognize when a finger was resting on it, which triggered certain actions. Maybe I'm way off base though.It will increase the cost of those covers as they will have to engineer materials to transfer electric conduction from the button surface to the finger through their cover’s medium.
It will turn on just fine after being powered down. Same as physical buttons, they clearly run on a controller that works when the phone is "off".Not sure how I feel about this. One step closer to the portless iPhone I don’t want. No explanation for how we will DFU or Restore our phones, or how we will turn them on again after being powered down
There are times when a physical control is much more satisfying and useful than touch screen style controls. It’s one of the major reasons why the home button on iPads has been, and still is, popular for so long.
No way to really know how well this will work in practice until we get it, but I’m skeptical. Maybe this will be another touchbar expirent.
The same thing that happens when iOS freezes today. The button combination to force a reboot of the phone is built into the firmware that runs independently of iOS. There's nothing preventing the firmware in newer models from including the necessary code to detect capacitive buttons.Now I wonder what will Happen when iOS is frozen or stuck. Will it be possible to even restart the device Without using touch screen? Given apple’s current software quality record, I’m not putting too much faith on that one.
I'm on silent 24/7/365. Dispatch from work on emergency bypass so it always rings (for power outages). For everything else, I depend on my Apple Watch for notifications... and that's mainly just texts and calls, everything else gets relegated to an app badge, if even that (I keep to a strict "zero social media notification of any kind" policy).so how is this meant to work with cases?
i agree it's useless because i never use it to turn it silent. i don't get how people can use their phone on silent. i'm not constantly looking at my phone so will miss messages/notifications/calls.
I love the look of the iPad Mini. As soon as they add ProMotion it will be an instant buy for me.I’m all for redesign but I doubt they’ll move away from flat-edge aesthetic as they’re just moving other devices to flat-edge. I do like the role that design language plays in unifying their products.
Just yesterday I was removing the smudges off the screen of my iPad mini 6, fully removing its folio for the first time in a while. I was struck by how well that device looks/feels in-hand. And thought back to a pre-iPhone Apple and how something like an iPad mini 6 would have melted faces back then. It’s a culmination of so much iteration. Overall, I think it might be my favorite Apple device to date.
Who are these monsters that put their phone back in their pocket/bag without turning off the screen?I also use the side button to lock my phone, but I'm sure there are many that never use it for that and just let the phone lock itself.
The real reason for this change is to needlessly increase the price of the iPhone 15 Pro models, probably by $100. You can't add two taptic engines and expect the price to stay the same.
Plenty of use cases for having your iPhone on silent. Meetings, cinema/theatre, work, etc. where you don't want to have it ringing or other audio notifications but can discreetly check whenever you need/want. That physical switch is a godsend.so how is this meant to work with cases?
i agree it's useless because i never use it to turn it silent. i don't get how people can use their phone on silent. i'm not constantly looking at my phone so will miss messages/notifications/calls.
It would require hardware digital logic that handles the power function to be fail proof since you wouldn’t have the ability to kill power to the system mechanically. You wouldn’t want it in software though since that requires the CPU to be operating.Don't you need "real" buttons to turn on or force restart the device? Otherwise some part of the software needs to always work/run.
😂😂Who are these monsters that put their phone back in their pocket/bag without turning off the screen?
You think that's what is happening today? A mechanical power-off-switch?since you wouldn’t have the ability to kill power to the system mechanically.
The MacBook Pro is still the same price it was back in 2007 (and the PowerBook G4 before that!). I doubt they'll be willing to break the $999 psychological price point quite yet.The Pro and Pro Max models are perhaps due for (U.S.) price increases. Despite various improvement and recent high inflation, they are still priced the same as or less than they were when first launched back in 2019.
no, the button is still pressure sensitive. the software only needs to be present in order to produce a response to the button being pressed, but the actual press can still be detected as any regular button.Don't you need "real" buttons to turn on or force restart the device? Otherwise some part of the software needs to always work/run.
this is very wrong. solid state buttons ≠ touch screen buttons.It will increase the cost of those covers as they will have to engineer materials to transfer electric conduction from the button surface to the finger through their cover’s medium.
Apple welcomes you to 2014’s technology with open arms.That's it lol?
* I don't really care if the buttons are real or not, as long as they feel like real buttons
* I use magsafe to charge, I don't really care about USB-C. Rather, it'll be expensive for me to replace all my Lighting cables/accessories with USB-C alternatives.