Now that I'd sign up for...What a missed opportunity to release a 32” 6k@120hz m3 Imac
Hence the Finder icon in the announcement...everyone has forgotten that we should have MacOS in the ipad pros.
When devices are back ordered with rumored new chips coming in that 2-3 week window, do you automatically get updated to the new chip?That's pretty obvious they'll be releasing new 14"&16" MacBook Pro.
In Europe base configurations of the 16" are backordered for 2-3 weeks.
What a missed opportunity to release a 32” 6k@120hz m3 Imac
Exactly.you aren't cross shopping and the same can be said if your work uses Windows or you want a gaming PC.
So the analyst who said there will be NO more Apple events or new Macs this year, is now stating what the event he claimed would never happen will contain, which is in total contrast to everyone else.. why does anyone believe what Koh says anymore?
I posted the Nvidia story from Reuters yesterday: https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...machines.2408482/?post=32657470#post-32657470After witnessing the announcements from Qualcomm's keynote today, I'm confident they will. A lot to get excited about.
The M1 is a three year old chip. The M2 is an 18 month old chip. Those are both considered old in the tech world where CPUs are typically refreshed annually (as AMD and Intel do). People in the market for a new Mac aren't wrong for wanting the best bang for their buck by waiting for the next CPU refresh cycle, which is overdue. Apple likely wants to be on an annual M-series upgrade cycle, just as it is with the A-series, so it can keep pace with the competition.How nicely that all works out! Of course, why is everyone all juiced up with excitement about M3? Because today, M2 and M1 Macs run every single Mac app available just fine. It's all "good enough" too. So why bother with M3 if good enough is enough?
That's the "latest & greatest" effect. M3 launches will lead to soon putting down even "slow/weak/inferior" M2 whether true or not. That's how "latest & greatest" works.
3-5 or so months from now, if Vpro rolls out with "last years" or "2 year old" brains for it's "too high" price and all the spin about how it is magical/amazing/incredible/best ever, etc... the ridicule will fly fast & furious... whether your point is true or false. "If it's going to have "old chips", the price should be lower" seems likely to fly too.
But, let's go with your idea: M3 is not entirely about more processing power. Apparently 3nm will be far more energy efficient. If it can be clocked down to "good enough" M2 processing power, that should jack up the power sipping even more... which seems highly desirable to counter one of the weakest issues with Vpro now: 2 hour battery life. Does upgrading to M3 add an hour or two if it runs at only M2 "good enough" processing power? We don't know. But even if it really doesn't need any more power, it could certainly use more capacity on battery. 3nm should deliver that.
The article is by Ewan Spence, and should be ignored (or at least taken with a grain of salt) as a result. His articles are based entirely on conjecture, as is the case here. He's so certain in the rumors that the M3 won't launch until next year that he deduces, by process of elimination, that it must an M2 Ultra in an MBP.![]()
New MacBook Pro Leak Reveals Stunning Apple Decision
Despite the delay to the MacBook Air, Apple is preparing a surprise for MacBook Pro fans...www.forbes.com
I’m not sure if anybody else has seen this but Forbes is saying that probably they will launch a MacBooK Pro with the M2 Ultra, along with the updated more efficient screen on the whole MacBook Pro line. They say it’s not probable that it will be the M3 Pro/Max chips for now.
I guess we’ll see!
The M1 is a three year old chip. The M2 is an 18 month old chip. Those are both considered old in the tech world where CPUs are typically refreshed annually (as AMD and Intel do). People in the market for a new Mac aren't wrong for wanting the best bang for their buck by waiting for the next CPU refresh cycle, which is overdue. Apple likely wants to be on an annual M-series upgrade cycle, just as it is with the A-series, so it can keep pace with the competition.
Regarding the Vision Pro you're missing the original commenter's point. The M2 has more than enough processing power for the Vision Pro. That device's selling feature is the user experience, the immersion and everything that can be done with it. Raw CPU horsepower isn't needed at this point; no one is going to be using a Vision Pro to run Adobe Photoshop or Final Cut Pro on it or crunch 100,000 line Excel spreadsheets. The commenter was not implying the M3 would focus on efficiency, likely the opposite; the M3 will likely have a similar power draw as an M2 but will be much faster. There are absolutely Mac users with professional workflows who could use the extra horsepower.
It's great that Apple becomes less predictable again 🥳So the analyst who said there will be NO more Apple events or new Macs this year, is now stating what the event he claimed would never happen will contain, which is in total contrast to everyone else.. why does anyone believe what Koh says anymore?
Hmm I understand your point, but I think it’s still a valid option, which would explain the “Scary Fast” title and at the same time would still give Apple space to launch the new M3 Pro/Max next year, as all rumours originally pointed out to.The article is by Ewan Spence, and should be ignored (or at least taken with a grain of salt) as a result. His articles are based entirely on conjecture, as is the case here. He's so certain in the rumors that the M3 won't launch until next year that he deduces, by process of elimination, that it must an M2 Ultra in an MBP.
![]()
New MacBook Pro Leak Reveals Stunning Apple Decision
Despite the delay to the MacBook Air, Apple is preparing a surprise for MacBook Pro fans...www.forbes.com
I’m not sure if anyone else has seen this but Forbes is saying that probably they will launch a MacBooK Pro with the M2 Ultra, along with the updated more efficient screen on the whole MacBook Pro line. They say it’s not probable that it will be the M3 Pro/Max chips for now.
I guess we’ll see!
People get so triggered over that 13“ model to the point that they act as if it’s some sort of personal affront. I find that a little weird.It really doesn't.
The MacBook Air M2 is a superior laptop for the 13" crowd. Lighter weight, bigger display, better Facetime camera, Bluetooth 5.3, and, despite all this, cheaper, and with a thinner case.
For the people that really need a "Pro" and are willing to sacrifice weight and thinness, there is the 14" model with much better performance - better cooling (i.e. it has fans), faster Pro chips, more RAM et.c. for not much more.
The only reason I see the for the "Fake Pro" as you call it is the Touch Bar (which was controversial to begin with) and maybe most importantly - a lot of organisations worldwide that wrongfully believe their users need a Pro to do any actual work, so they purchase the old and cheap Pro, not knowing that the Air is actually the better option. I tend to see this a lot.
I think Apple should focus on bringing down the price of the "new Pro" and retire this old Touch Bar thingy.