Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Your argument basically is the government can not regulate unless it is a safety and public health issue. I am sure corporations would love those limits so they can do everything they want without any limits by arguing that it is not a safety or public health issue.
Versus a government that would love to be able to do anything they want without any limits by arguing it IS a safety or public health issue?
 
Again I have to bring up the hugely successful macOS which allows third party stores and sideloading. Weirdly the earth is still here as is the Mac in perfect working order.

Your analogy about Ford is very flawed. The government does mandate cars have seatbelts and companies like Ford fought against those kind of regulations based on all kinds of reasons from cost to design and appearance.

The government of the EU also has laws about how the front bonnets of vehicles are shaped again for public safety. They also have rules about size and weight, emissions, the materials the vehicle can use (for instance the banning of lead based paints).

The car is probably the most regulated consumer product you can purchase with literally thousands of rules that automakers must adhere to and not just for public safety but also for competition reasons.
MacOS is hardly "hugely" successful. Maybe 8% of the market.
 
Just because two parties consent to a transaction doesn't make it legal. Particularly when there is a massive power disparity between the two parties.

I've had many massive, in-depth conversations on this topic in this forum already. If you have a point, feel free to make one.
When you buy a device that is not even the most popular one and know how it works, the person with the power is the consumer. The misuse of power is for the EU to decide to break our preferred system that we as consumers knowing chose and have thousands invested in. I’m angry ?
 
I just wish they had reined in some of the crazy parts, it makes them look silly when they want to require (for example) third party voice assistants because that will require a fundamental rethink in the way Apps are allowed to communicate on iOS and/or require Apple to build some sort of universal voice assistant API.
The crazy parts are the whole purpose. There are no major EU smartphone companies, but there are lots of little software companies. The EU is trying to force foreign businesses to make every piece interchangable with something the EU can produce. They don't care about the user experience or engineering efficiencies or broader market forces because none of that affects their local economies. It's a welfare program for EU startups.
 
Every assistant does the same, Apple does less the Amazon or Google. But hey go ahead and download joes assistant app and see how well that works out
The point is its not going to work out. It's going to cause all kinds of problems later down the line. The EU was more interested in looking important than helping people.
 
It would be nice being able to install a third party browser on iOS/iPADOS without Apple intentionally sabotaging it so you have a worse experience compared to Safari.
It's not sabotaged. Third parties simply aren't going to get complete access to the underlying system the way native apps are by default. That's just the way it is. Third party browsers in iOS are simply Safari Skins anyway. Phones require higher level of security than traditional computers given the nature of what is stored on them...
 
Control of their own systems. Customers have options. Buy something else. People suck
The crazy parts are the whole purpose. There are no major EU smartphone companies, but there are lots of little software companies. The EU is trying to force foreign businesses to make every piece interchangable with something the EU can produce. They don't care about the user experience or engineering efficiencies or broader market forces because none of that affects their local economies. It's a welfare program for EU startups.
This is exactly what's going on. This is not about consumer protection, this is about business protection in the EU. 27 countries in the EU only 5 bigger than California., combine Texas and California and that drop to 0. Apple does not need to destroy the iPhone just so it appeases a few EU politicians and businessmen
 
It's not sabotaged. Third parties simply aren't going to get complete access to the underlying system the way native apps are by default. That's just the way it is. Third party Browsers in iOS are simply Safari Skins anyway.
It is Sabotaged. When I try to watch videos it does not allow me to use full screen mode which works just fine on Safari but not on any other third party browser.
 
Governments force automakers to install features all the time, from ABS to three-point seatbelts, airbags, child-proof door locks, emissions standards, etc; drivers are required to use snow-tires or install chains in many jurisdictions, others require safety-kits, spare tires, high-vis vests, etc. Considering four-wheel drive is a safety advantage, it’s pretty far from outlandish to imagine a government requiring it on new cars sold sometime in the future, just like any-lock brakes went from an add-on feature to requirement in many jurisdictions. We already live in the world you so fear, and it seems automakers have survived just fine.
Comparing seat belts being required in cars so people aren't decapitated going through the windshield isn't the same as forcing sideloading on a phone...

It's not so much having the choice to sideload but being forced to choose it that is the problem. If I wanted that I could have bought that. It's already available. I want the choice to buy a product that doesn't feature sideloading...
 
The crazy parts are the whole purpose. There are no major EU smartphone companies, but there are lots of little software companies. The EU is trying to force foreign businesses to make every piece interchangable with something the EU can produce. They don't care about the user experience or engineering efficiencies or broader market forces because none of that affects their local economies. It's a welfare program for EU startups.
What will be your made-up reason for the legislation that's being written in the U.S.? And other countries? Everybody is wrong except Apple apparently.
 
Massive government overreach. Play hardball Apple and threaten to pull out of the EU. They need you more than you need them.

What do you think is more likely, that consumers in the EU will pivot to Android devices or that Apple will find another market of ~450m of among the richest consumers on Earth within a timescale that matters to shareholders?

A company driven by privacy and security that manages to operate compliantly in China will find a way to comply with the DMA.

I also imagine that some here think they are particularly clever by suggesting an iPhone stripped of everything -- that will surely show the horrible EU who's boss. Well, if it weren't for the annoying fact that Apple still wants those € to flow their way and that only works if you sell a compelling product. If Apple is childishly petty, I'm certain Samsung is more than happy to help out.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.