Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is Apple personally sabotaging your phone? Maybe Tim Apple saw your posts here? He hasn't targeted my phone yet... Full screen still works ?
Since you want to call me a liar here is a screenshot of the message I get when I attempt full screen video on any other browser besides Safari.
 

Attachments

  • CE9D41C1-A2AA-4209-B505-62AC2ED1CA23.png
    CE9D41C1-A2AA-4209-B505-62AC2ED1CA23.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 70
What will be your made-up reason for the legislation that's being written in the U.S.? And other countries? Everybody is wrong except Apple apparently.

My point is specifically that nobody's right, including Apple. So let there be a choice of platforms and the market will drift in the direction of more right.

I guess I've always given Europe the benefit of the doubt and seen their past approaches to regulation as being more high minded and rational than the US or other countries. But you could be right-- maybe there isn't a good reason for this, maybe it's just stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
The govt bureaucrats who wish to impose this will never pay a penalty if it goes wrong. Thats the biggest problem. They can use their power without any consequence.

We will look back on this as the golden age of phones before govts screwed it all up. Apple you should have bought more politicians. You got to play their game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
Comparing seat belts being required in cars so people aren't decapitated going through the windshield isn't the same as forcing sideloading on a phone...

It's not so much having the choice to sideload but being forced to choose it that is the problem. If I wanted that I could have bought that. It's already available. I want the choice to buy a product that doesn't feature sideloading...
So you want choice to buy something with no choice? Nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Since you want to call me a liar here is a screenshot of the message I get when I attempt full screen video on any other browser besides Safari.
I was just able to open a full-screen YouTube video in Firefox on my iPhone without issue, but I run into this message on Safari on macOS sometimes and usually the video goes full-screen once you click the button again (even if it's grayed out). I figure it'd be the same if you tapped the button again. Probably something to do with WebKit and/or YouTube's player. Almost like Apple should allow third-party browser engines on iOS, huh… ;)
 
And this is the key difference! There is only one entity that can compel by fine or imprisonment. They have a monopoly on it actually.
Thats the monopoly that everyone should be worried about since historically its the one that leads to actual problems. But here we are trying to make it so Sony can no longer have a digital store because they were forced to allow loading from everywhere and sweating about digital marketplace monopolies. Ridiculous.

If I dont like how apple does stuff....I find a new platform. Its super easy. Imagine calling a politician to solve a problem you can solve yourself.
 
  • Love
Reactions: siddavis
This has been said countless of times, but I’ll repeat it: I buy into Apple‘s ecosystem and I get what I expect. I know that when I buy an iPad, the only way to install software is via the App Store. I don’t expect anything else.

If this is such a problem with Apple, video game console manufacturers should be treated the same way and let me sideload games onto it without having to mod the system. But you know that’s never gonna happen, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo † and ric22
Apple's legal team is going to be busy in the coming days. I don't understand why the government is always after Apple. I wonder if Apple will pull out from all this mess.
They dont give politicians enough money. The tech giants dont understand how the graft works yet for these politicians. They will figure it out eventually.
 
So you want choice to buy something with no choice? Nice.
Yes. I think you don't understand how choice works. You don't go and buy an ice cream sundae thinking you'll choose the flavor later. The choice is at the platform level. If you want to buy Neapolitan so you can pick your flavor spoonful buy spoonful, go for it. If I want chocolate and only chocolate, I don't need the government telling me "all ice cream sold must be Neapolitan".
 
There is a lot to like about this proposed law, but it will kill competition in the browser market. Chrome-based browsers already dominate the marketplace. Only Webkit provides real competition due to Apple forcing browsers to use it for iOS and iPadOS.
 
This has been said countless of times, but I’ll repeat it: I buy into Apple‘s ecosystem and I get what I expect. I know that when I buy an iPad, the only way to install software is via the App Store. I don’t expect anything else.

If this is such a problem with Apple, video game console manufacturers should be treated the same way and let me sideload games onto it without having to mod the system. But you know that’s never gonna happen, right?
And nobody will take your right to continue stuffing money into Tims throat.
 
Welcome to the EU-SSR. Ashamed to live in this more and more 'China'-style govenment controlling mindset continent. Leave my apple devices and services alone you over-paid good for nothing bureaucrats.


You realize the "actual" Chinese government has forced Apple to remove Apps they don't like, right?

That wouldn't be possible if installing software of your choosing on iOS was allowed.
 
They want a back door into iMessage etc. so, force Apple to allow 3rd party apps to connect to iMessage then build the back door into those apps. Mission complete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
They dont give politicians enough money. The tech giants dont understand how the graft works yet for these politicians. They will figure it out eventually.
Ah yes, what's more American than politicians and big business working together to screw consumers. They'll figure it out eventually..

Personally I'm glad big business on the working end of the stick this time, rather than consumers or small companies.
 
Personally I'm glad big business on the working end of the stick this time, rather than consumers or small companies.
I'm not sure which end you consider the working end, but if you think it's the bad end, you're not seeing this clearly. Apple isn't going to be hurt by this— the EU is guaranteeing them a market. There are a very small number of companies capable of building devices able to meet these complex requirements and Apple is one of them. They'll make whatever they need to for people to buy it, and if nobody wants it they'll move on to something else or close down and spend their days in comfortable retirement.

The bad end of the stick is consumers who face a more homogenized marketplace, and any potential Apple competitors who have a whole new level of complexity they need to achieve to legally compete in the EU. The EU has decided the world has enough smartphone makers, and they're pushing to commodify the existing players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
The EU has decided the world has enough smartphone makers, and they're pushing to commodify the existing players.
The world already decided that the world has enough smartphone makers. Just like the world decided two decades ago that we have enough desktop operating system makers, browser makers, Office software makers...

Natural monopolies are very real things. Pity that the EU is the only government entity willing to acknowledge this.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I'm not sure which end you consider the working end, but if you think it's the bad end, you're not seeing this clearly. Apple isn't going to be hurt by this. There are a very small number of companies capable of building devices able to meet these complex requirements and Apple is one of them. They'll make whatever they need to for people to buy it, and if nobody wants it they'll move on to something else or close down and spend their days in comfortable retirement.

The bad end of the stick is consumers who face a more homogenized marketplace, and any potential Apple competitors who have a whole new level of complexity they need to achieve to legally compete in the EU. The EU has decided the world has enough smartphone makers, and they're pushing to commodify the existing players.
Apple will follow the law and do whatever it takes to remain in that market. They might kick and scream in the courts for a bit, but at the end of the day Apple shareholders aren't going to accept Tim Cook forgoing Apple's $89 billion take in the EU marketplace. That's a quarter of Apple's worldwide revenue. Shareholders also won't accept Apple artificially hobbling their EU products out of spite, because consumers won't accept that either and that would have a nearly equally dire effect on Apple's aforementioned $89 billion in that market.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.