Right? The childishness and kowtowing to grossly disproportionate authoritarian rule is astounding.😑 — so tiring to see how folks are eager to use force to make companies do what they have a personal preference for.
Right? The childishness and kowtowing to grossly disproportionate authoritarian rule is astounding.😑 — so tiring to see how folks are eager to use force to make companies do what they have a personal preference for.
actualy the EU commision are experts in theri field apointed by the parlament. so we have actual people with a backround in the relevent industry designing the legislation for politicians to debate on.I doubt it. Unfortunately politicians tend to come from legal or finance backgrounds. There are very few politicians with backgrounds in medicine, tech, or science.
The cookie wall legislation could be solved with industry cooperation, and I do think it should be refined so that it can happen. Create categories of cookies, which is what most sites already do. Put a user setting in each browser allowing the user to specify which types of cookies they will or will not allow, then then pass that to each site which can enable or disable the appropriate cookies.
Yes, especially the pharmaceutical ones when working under the guise of “public health,” you know, for the government.I think you forgot that some companies are even better at that.
Why don't you buy android and suffer the consequences?Good on the EU for protecting competition.
What Apple should consider is - a toggle switch that keeps the ecosystem as is, with full Apple support. With the toggle off support for hardware and software support only up to resetting iOS as shipped with the phone. No support for issues caused by side loaded apps. No representation of security or tracking unless you opt for secured close setting.
I do like your comment. But there is a difference between creating a standard and forcing that standard to be the only way to communicate. We already have communication standards - called text messaging, email.A lot of things that the EU wants to regulate are not innovations. Text based chat over TCP/IP was around in the 90's. iMessage is a brand, Apple built a brand and shoehorned it into every iPhone to make it popular but they did not innovate the client-server message protocol. They didn't innovate being able to send messages to a list of friends using their email address etc
In-fact email which is a very open system (okay it's abused to hell by spam but that's more a product of its initial design limitations) is a good example of what's possible when something is open. Email is very cheap and accessible on every single device imaginable. Wouldn't it be great if we had that for every platform for real-time communication instead of mails? - I'm not suggesting iMessage be opened to third parties and that Apple be forced to pay for the servers and maintenance. I'm suggesting something more akin to a consortium of companies get together to make an open protocol.
Just like they did for WiFi, USB, Web standards, Video codecs etc - Apple is on many of these consortiums as are Google, Microsoft, Amazon and hundreds of other tech companies because there is a great deal of benefit to working together on foundational technologies.
You also mentioned FaceTime, again they didn't come up with video conferencing. We had it in the 1980's and it has just gotten more and more standardised since then, in-fact Facetime uses the H.264 (maybe even H.265 now) codecs which Apple is part of the consortium that make these standardised codecs possible.
The EU isn't saying to Apple you must provide other companies with your ARM chip designs or the operating system you made. But certain things that allow one iPhone to interact with another iPhone and no other phone hurt consumer choice. And this is also true for the rest of the market. All the messaging platforms that are locked down, all the video apps etc - It needs more standardisation and if the companies themselves won't do it then perhaps regulations are needed.
iPhones are exactly the same as any computer. what's the difference between an iPad Pro running iOS and a MacBook Air running MacOS? outside of one allowing you to install any application you want, and the other doesn't?What are you talking about? I don’t have a computer on every floor in my house. So if someone falls or collapses nowhere near my computer, I can’t use it! What’s with the attitude on these forums lately. Yes my 50 pound desktop is on one floor in a three story house.
And to say a computer is equivalent to a cell phone because Skype can call 911 is just ridiculous.
Also if you actually read what I said is that an iPhone needs to be a phone “at all times”. I don’t take my 50 pound desktop with me in the car in case I get in a wreck and need to call 911.
oh i have **** tone of apps i would love to use. the best example tho is the Opter app is use for work, but because the app barely works on iOS it's become kind of deprecated and I'm forced to buy an android phone or use a ****** work phone to do my job instead of using my iPhoneLegit question, what current apps do people want on their phone that are not available on the App Store?
I’ll stay within the walled garden - the ramifications of this may backfire on the EU. Apple can bring in some of its own stricter regulations if this legislation goes through.
well do you want apple or the developers to pocket the difference? I would rather developers takes it, then apple just putting it on a pile giving me no extra value in return. and if apple wants to increse the price of things, then they are free do do so, and we will see if iOS App Store ends up as abandoned as the Mac App Store eith barebone apps only available because the store is too DraconianMore likely developers will just pocket the difference as additional profit since people have already shown a willingness to pay. The consumer will see no benefit, this just shifts who gets the money. My guess is Apple will simply add or raise other fees to make up for any loss, hurting small developers most.
If you as an individual is losing interest in what Apple offers it’s client base, that’s ok. That is why companies offer alternative products. The App Store was not even in the initial plans, so it has been a gift to alL involved. They don’t have to continue to support it in its current form and if it becomes more of a liability than profit center it will be canceled and all APIs taken private. This is a slap in the face of the billions of us who choose Apple because of they walked garden. Who are you or anyone else to undermine the thousands of dollars We’ve spent to be in this garden. If some doesn’t like Target and how they do business, they don’t drive across town to Target to stand in the aisles and scream bloody murder at the top of their lungs because the prices are two high or they don’t care for this or that in their business Modrel. No, they just go to the Walmart up the street that will give them what they want.That's like saying I should use Windows instead of macOS when we all know full well we love that we can install third party software on our Macs because we prefer that operating system.
I prefer iOS from a UI and usability perspective and I prefer the iPhone from a hardware perspective. To me the locked down walled-garden that Apple has created is just one side of what the iPhone is and it's the only side I'm losing interest in having.
I'm a successful business owner that deals exclusively in the creation and sale of software so actually in this regard I do know what I'm talking about, I probably know more about the underpinnings of iOS than most who will comment in this thread having worked on some of the apps you probably have used over the past 15 years.
I would like platform neutrality to the degree that macOS affords users. You are free to disagree and you are also free to stay within Apples walled garden and never install a third party app store or sideload an app, your phone your choice.
You would be surprisedI'm talking about incompatible with gas pumps!
The EU didnt need to force Tesla to make compatible charge points. The market would have forced Tesla. Tesla cannot supply all the EV's in the world. Other EV companies would eventually make up the lion share of EV cars forcing Tesla to comply. However, to start off their innovation you cant force companies to make commercial decisions that aren't in their interest.
That's the thing, these things covers android as well, especially the rule of uninstalling included apps.I just dont get it at all. Everything they want is already present and functioning. in Android. If these things are so important that people cant live without they will buy anything but iPhone.
They are asking to change the functionality of an iPhone to be exactly like an Android. Why the hassle? Just buy an Andoid instead, you will get all you asking for and whole other things that you didn't ask for it.
So buy an Android phone, no one is stopping you.As time goes on my desire for sideloading and installing apps that Apple would never allow grows stronger so I have to say I support the EU lawmakers in this endeavour.
The EU is doing literally the opposite. Instead of competing smartphone platforms with different tradeoffs it’s trying to make a one size fits all approach. If the EU had its way, all cars would have to be the same. All computers the same. All everything. It’s massive, unnecessary government overreach. Literally everything that the EU wants to require Apple to do customers can get on their own TODAY by buying an Android phone. NOTHING is stopping you OR them from doing it. NOTHING.Good on the EU for protecting competition.
Something along these lines has been mentioned before in a kinda “all-in” scenario and which I like a lot: have that (permanent) toggle switch make it a “blank phone, install any OS that you will, choose any Bluetooth/GPU/WiFi drivers desired, choose to install any third party AppStore, browsers, media engines and players, etc”What Apple should consider is - a toggle switch that keeps the ecosystem as is, with full Apple support. With the toggle off support for hardware and software support only up to resetting iOS as shipped with the phone. No support for issues caused by side loaded apps. No representation of security or tracking unless you opt for secured close setting.
I don‘t get it that you don‘t get it …I just dont get it at all. Everything they want is already present and functioning. in Android. If these things are so important that people cant live without they will buy anything but iPhone.
They are asking to change the functionality of an iPhone to be exactly like an Android. Why the hassle? Just buy an Andoid instead, you will get all you asking for and whole other things that you didn't ask for it.
No all they are doing is trying to dumb the App Store iOS and all the other crap that the EU has no idea what they are doing other than dumbing down iOS and iPhone down to android level. If side loading was some magical bean I’d say Apple would have implemented by now and or Apple’s iPhone and iOS would be dead in the water right now. See the EU is doing the very thing they claim they aren’t. Picking winners and losers. I’m not seeing no Samsung special features being dumbed down so Apple can implement them. It would be quite the one thing if Apple was a monopoly but it is in fact a trailer in world wide phone sales a trailer forGood on the EU for protecting competition.
If you can check this post, time permitting that is, what would you think about applying something like Sony did for PS3 with Yellow Dog Linux? But even MORE freedom:That's where we see things different. I don't see it as an overreach of power. I see it as a well reasoned defence of consumer rights. We own our devices and should be able to do what we want with them. If I want to smash it on the pavement I can and I should also be able to install the software I want.
I also believe this for game consoles and I hope one day it happens there too.
Exactly. It is as simple as that. Every knows knew or were aware of Apples walled garden. Now everyone wants it dumbed down to the lowest common denominator known as Samsung and the android os if I wanted a crap phone and a crappier os then I would be in that crap that I perceive/believe to be a lower quality phone and definitely a crappier os.So do I. Please stop imposing your wants on it through regulation. Don't like the walled-garden approach? Leave.
I wish they would and could survive financially and give the eu the bird and closeApple's legal team is going to be busy in the coming days. I don't understand why the government is always after Apple. I wonder if Apple will pull out from all this mess.
I don’t know about Target, but people often protest Walmart:If you as an individual is losing interest in what Apple offers it’s client base, that’s ok. That is why companies offer alternative products. The App Store was not even in the initial plans, so it has been a gift to alL involved. They don’t have to continue to support it in its current form and if it becomes more of a liability than profit center it will be canceled and all APIs taken private. This is a slap in the face of the billions of us who choose Apple because of they walked garden. Who are you or anyone else to undermine the thousands of dollars We’ve spent to be in this garden. If some doesn’t like Target and how they do business, they don’t drive across town to Target to stand in the aisles and scream bloody murder at the top of their lungs because the prices are two high or they don’t care for this or that in their business Modrel. No, they just go to the Walmart up the street that will give them what they want.
I was always conflicted about all the new Apple users brought by the iPhone. I knew their purchases allowed for extensive investments, but alway felt there was a downside not yet realized.
This I think is key. That I’m aware of, nobody has asked you, me or anybody else that I know of what consumers want.The EU never bothered to provide any cost/quality/selection/satisfaction data to back up the idea that iOS was worse for consumers than Android/Windows/Mac so don't expect them to pay attention to any data that shows the new laws did absolutely nothing to improve competition or provide better cost/quality/selection/satisfaction to consumers.
I think it's mostly a cover for wanting to destroy privacy/security on mobile.