Its about time they release a new mini....though I don't know if I believe this picture or not.
That looks LEGIT. Well done!
Notice how all the symbols (labeling the ports) are in exactly the same place as the old mini, as can be seen in the comparison photos.
Nothing has moved a millimeter except for new ports have been added, which would be so easy to photoshop on a white surface like that.
I feel the display port at least would have moved a bit, but its still on the 3rd grill from the right.
This is an obvious fake!
But bring on the updates please..
That's a good point. FrontRow is so dysfunctional on the mac that its not worth the efforts. My biggest gripe with it ( and there are more than one) is that after all this time that its been shipping on macs one cannot do simple things like categorize movies based on genres or make custom folders. How the heck or you supposed to keep track of a movie collection and use it with front row if it can't do that. I would buy the mini if it worked with frontrow like it should. Also, I can't justify buying an appleTV with the ridiculously small hard drives that they ship with only to be forced to strap on an external hard drive. Seems that apple isn't taking this whole digital hub thing very seriously.
5 usb ports is way too excessive for Apple. Just doesnt make any sense given Apple's track record. Plus dont USB controllers always come in pairs?
You already pretty much can. I hook up my MBP to our TV at home and use Front Row to make it just like an Apple TV. You could use it as both a computer and Apple TV.
Let us not forget Apple first marketted the mini to be used under the TV, so don't be surprised when people do that and thus ask for a HDMI port. Not many TV's come with a DVI anymore.
If that's it and it has 5 USB ports and no HDMI then it is a FAIL.
Because HDMI means you can hook it up to a TV, thus play your media without having to convert to other formats.
Does that pass audio?
I'm undecided how real this actually is, but I sure hope the next mini can runTV software on it. No HDMI pretty much indicates that that isn't a priority, but HDMI is only really needed for BluRay. Which simply isn't going to happen.
Otherwise, I can get DVI-HDMI cables, and digital audio cables and get the mini hooked up to my big screen pretty easily.
It's theTV software that would make this a nice media center. And I can run Safari for Hulu content.
Apple Computer Inc. died in January 2007 the day they introduced the iPhone.
I love that it comes with Firewire 800, while the MacBook is stuck only with USB. Apparently, Apple has designated the MacMini a 'professionals' device but not the MacBook. Meanwhile, even some cah-cah netbooks come with hig-speed eSATA sockets.
Also, why on God's green earth would you need 5 USB sockets on the MacMini?!! Let's see: 1) printer; 2) iPod/iPhone dock; 3) possible wired keyboard (though if the MacMini is supposed to be minimalist, do you really want a wired keyboard?); 4) possible wired mouse (see 3); and 5) scanner (and that's only if your printer is not multifunction). Besides, in these days of 'living in the cloud,' shouldn't many of these peripherals (i.e. printer, NAS, etc) be on our wireless networks?
This has to be a joke, right? Whoever is responsible should be Steved ASAP.
Not really if you are a Photoshop wiz, LOL! The clone stamp artifacts are crazy obvious to me, as well as the color/brightness difference around the cloned areas.
![]()
..dump 2 of the 5 USB slots for 2 HDMI slots.
I hope this is true...Ill be first in line to pick one of these up...
Hopefully this will come out soon...
Jesus Apple. For once, do the right thing.
Put an HDMI port on the Mac Mini.
So what if it might put it in minor contention with the AppleTV? So you lose a few AppleTV sales and you make it up with Mac Mini sales. It's a wash.
Everyone who is fairly technical wants to use this box as a media center. Just put the HDMI port on the box and make them happy.
For once, do what your hard core customers want. Cater to them.
HDMI isn't needed to connect a Mini to a TV (and display protected content), HDCP is. And HDCP can be supported on DVI and DisplayPort. Apple chose not to support HDCP prior to its move to DisplayPort, but now that the new unibodies support it , there is no reason they couldn't add it to a new Mini without ading HDMI. As far as audio goes, shouldn't you really be running S/PIDF to your audio system and not relying on your TV for sound?
Again, I think HDCP is what's needed for BluRay, not HDMI (then there's the whole protected path in the OS thing that Vista has and Apple would have to add). I know BluRay works from an HDMI-equipped player to a DVI-equipped TV, as long as the TV supports HDCP. So I don't see why the reverse can't happen.
Good point. You are correct, of course, that HDCP is the hang up. If you have an HDMI port out the back, then you know HDCP is going to work. But it could also work though the mini DisplayPort, mini-DVI, or any other fully digital display technology. Somehow, though, I doubt Apple would deal with HDCP over mini DisplayPort. If it doesn't have an HDMI adapter, it won't do protected content.
But none of it really matters, since HDCP won't happen in OS/X because SJ wants to avoid the whole "protected path" nonsense (which really is ugly) where you are constantly monitoring peripherals that can be added to the system to prevent copying, etc. I think Jobs is hoping Apple can give BR the pass altogether, and simply move to digital movie content without the need for a disc.
I too used to have a TV with only a DVI-I port (no HDMI) but I could hook up a BR player to it using an HDMI -> DVI-I cable. I used a similar cable to hook up a DVI player to an HDMI TV, but that wasn't a BR player so I don't know if any of the HDCP signal would be lost. I doubt it though.
Not to mention when they took "Computer" out of their name![]()