That's fair.Apples and Oranges.
LCD to LCD - Samsung wins
LG OLED is a different animal.
Samsung will have to join the oled tv game asap.
That's fair.Apples and Oranges.
LCD to LCD - Samsung wins
LG OLED is a different animal.
That's fair.
Samsung will have to join the oled tv game asap.
Display quality has absolutely nothing to do with brightness. That's an independent variable.Why would it be proportionally smaller? The size is based on the elements it contains, no?
[doublepost=1514985066][/doublepost]I don’t get all the brouhaha over OLED. Compared my 7+ to my SOs X last night. On full brightness the 7+ was way brighter, which for aging eyes like mine is more important than color reproduction fidelity.
Is it just that OLED has “true black” that everyone is raving about it? Not a big selling point to me.
Seeing as LG had issues with the Pixel XL 2 and V30? Not too confident as a consumer.
Then why is the iPhone X so dim?Display quality has absolutely nothing to do with brightness. That's an independent variable.
Then why is the iPhone X so dim?
Samsung was already in the OLED TV game and lasted only a year. They got out because their way of producing large OLED panels yielded poor results. LG is so far ahead in producing large OLED panels that Samsung will never catch up and that is why Samsung are trying to confuse consumers with the QLED nonsense.
Apparently current pixel 2xl models are unaffected by those issues, or at least the issue is greatly reduced to the point where it doesn't matter. That's just a comparison I've seen by a user that recently bought a new one and compared it to a launch model, so make of it what you will, but he either got lucky or lg fixed the issue.
Apple did invest in LG to make a new fab/production line, and since they did not use a samsung reference design for the iphone x, it is all about the quality of the manufacturing process and not up to which design/technique lg uses now.
My guess is that LG will be manufacturing an oled display for the x plus according to the same principles/tech/patents that samsung uses for the current x instead of the designed by LG pixel 2 screen.
So big differences? I don’ t think so. It is all about the yields and the quality of the new machines.
I think you need to check your facts about screen brightness. The details are very important. Maybe you should check out displaymate.
The iPhone X has a record high Full Screen Brightness for OLED Smartphones of 634 nits, which improves screen visibility in high Ambient Light. The Samsung Galaxy Note8 can produce up to 1,240 nits, but only for small portions of the screen area (Low Average Picture Levels) – for Full Screen Brightness the Note8 can produce up to 423 nits with Manual Brightness and 560 nits with Automatic Brightness only in High Ambient Light. For small portions of the screen area the iPhone X can produce up to 809 nits (Low Average Picture Levels). On its Home Screen the iPhone X produces an impressively bright 726 nits. See the Screen Brightness section for the measurements and details.
I think yes, as i was informed the peak brightness where samsung wins is only "portion" of the screen, so maybe Apple did indeed lower that peak brightness (as it also doesnt make sense to have a really bright part of the screen?) to prevent burnin. i think you are right about this, maybe apple was just smarter to have a upper limit on nits to prevent damage to the screen with long term use, but still keeping a nice bright full screen experienceDid Apple have Samsung reduce the nits due to burn-in/longevity concerns? That’s the only reason I could see Apple doing this, trying this as some preemptive, perhaps too aggressive mitigation tactic. Anyway, I would never set my iPhone anywhere close to full brightness.
Supposedly Google invested in LG OLED tech too... We shall see.
If the X Plus comes out, the X will be the largest “small” iPhone ever made. Call it what you will. I call it bulky.Bulky? Doesn’t seem bulky at all..maybe if you put a massive case on it
Compared it side by side? The n=1 I have looked at is demonstrably dimmer than a 6+, 6s+, and 7+. The nature of the display is different certainly, but it’s definitely not as bright.I really don’ t notice that. I think it is rather bright. Much brighter than previous iphones.
Numbers say otherwise. And my impression comparing the 2 alsoCompared it side by side? The n=1 I have looked at is demonstrably dimmer than a 6+, 6s+, and 7+. The nature of the display is different certainly, but it’s definitely not as bright.
They’re all 625 cd/m2 (this generation). iPhone 7 was around 705. So X is a bit dimmer than last generation. iPhone 6 was 500 cd/m2.Compared it side by side? The n=1 I have looked at is demonstrably dimmer than a 6+, 6s+, and 7+. The nature of the display is different certainly, but it’s definitely not as bright.
Sounds like an issue with that unitCompared it side by side? The n=1 I have looked at is demonstrably dimmer than a 6+, 6s+, and 7+. The nature of the display is different certainly, but it’s definitely not as bright.
Based on apple’s own reported specs the X is less bright than the iPhone 7. 625 cd/m2 vs 705.Sounds like an issue with that unit
iPhone X is far brighter than any previous iPhone and by some distance.
They iPhone X has a brighter screen than the Note 8 when using full screen brightness. Tested and verified.I do agree about the brightness, but thats not OLED's fault thats just apples decision about the X. Samsung S8 has ~1000 nits and note 8 has 1200 nits on OLED (twice the amount of X). iphone x has ~625 nits. I bet (hope) Apple will increase nits on next gen devices.
They iPhone X has a brighter screen than the Note 8 when using full screen brightness. Tested and verified.
Check your facts because you’re quoting localized brightness which is small parts of the screen.
People see the nits numbers high level and think the Note screen is twice as bright. Wrong.That report has been often misread, greatly because it presented info in a very disjointed way, and people don’t understand all the meadurements.
Foepr example, the “full screen brightness” measurement only applies to an all white display.
It’s measured with auto-brightness on, which on the Note increases the brightness far beyond all the other measurements (which are at manual settings).
It also depends on the average picture level (APL), which at a low amount is the “small parts” mentioned on the report. The higher the APL, the lower the brightness.
Going from low to high APL, the X gives about 804-603 nits. For apps like Safari at 80% APL, that works out to be about 665 nits.
Going from low to high APL, the Note 8 gives about 1250-560 nits. For apps like Chrome or the phone at 80% APL, that works out to be about 688 nits.
So in real life usage, they’re about the same.
People see the nits numbers high level and think the Note screen is twice as bright. Wrong.
[doublepost=1515354367][/doublepost]Let’s hope this isn’t true. Their phone PLED’s suck big time. They are at least 3 generations behind Samsung. They truly look horrible.
LG Display saw its shares surge to a one-month high on Wednesday following a report that the company will begin supplying OLED panels to Apple's new range of iPhones this year (via Financial Times).
LG's stock rallied on an Electronic Times report that the South Korean firm would make over 15 million OLED panels for Apple's 2018 range of iPhones. LG is already a supplier of LCD panels, currently used in the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus, but Samsung dominates supply of OLED displays for Apple's flagship iPhone X. Indeed, last week LG Display revealed in a regulatory filing that it didn't supply any of the OLED panels currently used in the iPhone X.
However, that could change this year, since Apple is expected to launch two new 5.8-inch and 6.5-inch iPhone models with OLED displays in 2018. According to today's report, LG Display will supply Apple with the 6.5-inch OLED panels, while Samsung will supply the 5.8-inch or 6-inch OLED panels.
Reports have been trickling out since July 2017 that Apple has invested billions of dollars in LG's OLED production capability for smartphones, but the fruits of its investment were thought to be some ways off. LG was initially reported to have secured 45,000 panels per month for future iPhones from 2019, while as recently as September it was suggested that Apple would have to wait until at least next year before it could move beyond Samsung for significant supplies of OLED panels. However, Wednesday's report suggests LG could secure its position as the number two supplier of OLED screens for Apple's iPhones as early as the second half of 2018. LG is said to be planning to mass-produce the panels for Apple at its Gen 6 flexible OLED production line located in Paju, South Korea.
LG came in for scrutiny recently after it emerged that the firm supplied Google with the Pixel 2 XL's OLED displays, some of which were reportedly prone to screen burn-in or image retention issues. It remains unclear whether the problems stemmed from LG or other factors were involved, although the smaller Pixel 2 and original Pixel phones - both with Samsung-supplied OLED displays - have experienced far fewer issues. It's also worth noting that Apple says OLED displays can show "slight visual changes" after extended long-term use and minor screen burn-in is considered normal.
The new iPhone X and iPhone X Plus will likely launch around the usual timeframe of September to October, potentially alongside a new 6.1-inch mid-range model with an LCD display.
Article Link: LG Display Could Supply OLED Displays for This Year's 'iPhone X Plus'
They iPhone X has a brighter screen than the Note 8 when using full screen brightness. Tested and verified.
Check your facts because you’re quoting localized brightness which is small parts of the screen.