I wonder if we should start a new thread or just use this one to co-ordinate putting a bit of pressure on LG support to get their finger out and resolve the outstanding firmware issues.
I really think this product is dead in LG's eyes.I wonder if we should start a new thread or just use this one to co-ordinate putting a bit of pressure on LG support to get their finger out and resolve the outstanding firmware issues.
I really think this product is dead in LG's eyes.
It's still an Apple Store exclusive, so it seems there are no ambitions from LG to increase its market presence. There is no "only at Apple" badge on it on the Apple Store so this doesn't seem to be due to an exclusivity agreement.
It probably was a loss maker and brand damaging for them overall. It can't have been a cheap product to design and build, had the Wi-Fi fiasco and consequential high return rate, an unplanned 25% discount applied, and of course the Apple Store tax.
If there was anyone who could put pressure on LG it's Apple, yet they seem to be happy to let its shortcomings slide. And we can be reasonably sure that Apple is aware of its shortcomings - examples: the mixed reviews on the Apple Store, their fixing of the laggy brightness adjustment in 10.12.4, and the complete absence of reference to the ambient light sensor (because it doesn't work) on Apple's site and support pages, despite it listing every other specification in detail.
Such a shame because most of the issues are almost certainly fixable in a comprehensive firmware update.
Maybe you could collect signatures from other members - would be nice to demonstrate to whoever at LG reads it that it isn't a one-off!Well LG ain't getting off the hook that easily as far as I'm concerned. They have released a product which has faults and I for one expect them to fix them, or at least attempt to. If the USB thing was some weird edge-case which is easily worked around then fair enough but that's not the case. This problem is easily reproduced.
I'm going to prepare a complaint about the volume issue and USB reconnection issue and see what they have to say.
Maybe you could collect signatures from other members - would be nice to demonstrate to whoever at LG reads it that it isn't a one-off!![]()
Oh dear, I've had a couple of run-ins with the email form people and they're utterly useless. One person told me my issues might be the cable, and suggested I buy a new one, linking me to a 0.9 metre USB-C cable on Amazon (which obviously wouldn't work). The second person thought I was talking about a washing machine.I've emailed LG support regarding the USB issue but also mentioned the volume non-linearity. I only had 1000 characters to play with so had to keep it brief. Once I get in contact I will hopefully be able to point them to this thread and all other (un)happy customers...![]()
Haha, yeah I know the support quality can be poor but I'm pretty persistent.Oh dear, I've had a couple of run-ins with the email form people and they're utterly useless. One person told me my issues might be the cable, and suggested I buy a new one, linking me to a 0.9 metre USB-C cable on Amazon (which obviously wouldn't work). The second person thought I was talking about a washing machine.
My interim fix is to change the microphone input up in the "Video" tab on the menubar. I do have two 5K monitors, and switch between the two microphones, you should be able to swap to the internal microphone, then swap back. This is still very annoying, and is the reason I'm on this forum looking for a fix.I have a weird issue with my screen...everything works perfectly, except the webcam and FaceTime!
I use my 5K mostly with my Mac in Clamshell, so everything is going through the monitor. When I do a FaceTime call, I am using the monitor's webcam, mic and terrible speakers (using external speakers makes a lovely echo).
After about 5 minutes, suddenly the microphone goes on mute, and the people can't hear me anymore on the other end. The only way to solve this is to just disconnect the screen and use my laptop.
Can anyone suggest a fix? Or had this issue as well?
Will
How do I reproduce the USB issue?
I eject my USB-C hard drive, disconnect my MBP from my 5K monitor, and reconnect it to the monitor?
After doing the above, my USB-C hard drive remounted itself.
With my previous monitor I simply had to leave the monitor disconnected from the computer for some time, and when i reconnected it my keyboard wouldn't work.
When did you get your display? The monitor I got last week continues to work well.
Not a hint of retention on either of mine.How is image retention for everybody else? I'd say it's surprisingly bad in my case, especially compared to my old 27 LED Cinema. It's not bad to the point of being unusable, but it's definitely very noticeable.
How do I reproduce the USB issue?
I eject my USB-C hard drive, disconnect my MBP from my 5K monitor, and reconnect it to the monitor?
After doing the above, my USB-C hard drive remounted itself.
My interim fix is to change the microphone input up in the "Video" tab on the menubar. I do have two 5K monitors, and switch between the two microphones, you should be able to swap to the internal microphone, then swap back. This is still very annoying, and is the reason I'm on this forum looking for a fix.
The display also doesn't appear to have full USB 3.1 bandwidth. I connected it to my Mac, and then connected a USB-C hub thing with ethernet to the display, when I run bandwidth tests with WiFi off I get about 450Mbps down and 650Mbps up, when I connect the same adaptor directly to the MacBook Pro I get over 900Mbps in both directions. I also get similar results with the Belkin USB-C adaptor:
Much was made of this earlier in the thread. At the moment it is fairly safe to assume that the display is acting correctly within the constraints of Thunderbolt 3, as mentioned by @MrX8503 and further explained by Intel - I've copied the relevant bits below but the full document is a good read for anyone interested.The display also doesn't appear to have full USB 3.1 bandwidth. I connected it to my Mac, and then connected a USB-C hub thing with ethernet to the display, when I run bandwidth tests with WiFi off I get about 450Mbps down and 650Mbps up, when I connect the same adaptor directly to the MacBook Pro I get over 900Mbps in both directions. I also get similar results with the Belkin USB-C adaptor:
Server -> USB-C Hub thing -> LG -> MacBook Pro:
server:~ my_username$ iperf -c macbookpro.local -f m
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to macbookpro.local, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.13 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.0.10 port 52787 connected with 192.168.0.194 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 530 MBytes 444 Mbits/sec
MacBook Pro -> LG -> USB-C Hub thing -> Server:
macbookpro:~ my_username$ iperf -c server.local -f m
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to server.local, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.13 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.0.194 port 51100 connected with 192.168.0.10 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 759 MBytes 637 Mbits/sec
Server -> USB-C Hub thing -> MacBook Pro:
server:~ my_username$ iperf -c macbookpro.local -f m
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to macbookpro.local, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.13 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.0.10 port 52929 connected with 192.168.0.194 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1082 MBytes 908 Mbits/sec
MacBook Pro -> USB-C Hub thing -> Server:
macbookpro:~ my_username$ iperf -c server.local -f m
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to server.local, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.13 MByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.0.194 port 51339 connected with 192.168.0.10 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1116 MBytes 935 Mbits/sec
They go on to make the interesting observation that Thunderbolt 3 is 40 Gbps bidirectionally, and display data is overwhelmingly one-way. Thus incoming data should be largely unaffected by display traffic.In some of the configurations described, the amount of data and display together from these underlying protocols will consume more than 40 Gbps.
[...]
If a consumer stresses a specific Thunderbolt port, and attempts to use dual simultaneous displays at high resolution and additional PCI Express data, the Thunderbolt 3 silicon will prioritize the display traffic first and throttle the (PCI Express) data traffic.
[...]
The PCI Express traffic on the Thunderbolt interface is then allowed to consume the entire remainder of the link... so PCI Express devices will continue to function with a variable rate of bandwidth, but certain performance levels may not be achieved if two high resolution displays are being used on the same port.
They go on to make the interesting observation that Thunderbolt 3 is 40 Gbps bidirectionally, and display data is overwhelmingly one-way. Thus incoming data should be largely unaffected by display traffic.
I agree, but what else is there to do? I need a software update ASAP.Indeed, temporarily swapping inputs works, but you have to repeat this every 5 minutes...and in the middle of work FaceTime calls is this a little bit ridiculous!
If you get a moment, can you try again but firstly with the USB-C connector that is closest to the Thunderbolt 3 socket, and secondly with the USB-C connector furthest away from the Thunderbolt 3 socket, and see if you get different results?![]()