Macworld 09 at the latest?
But honestly, the new update does represent better specs for the same money.
I think its much better to get the current update, then wait ...
Well so I have a couple questions to ask for everyone's opinion.
background: I'm 17 and will be getting a Macbook Pro as a graduation/birthday/own funds present. I plan on using it for a good 4 years through college. Now to my 2 questions:
1. How big of a step is 256 graphics to 512. If I want to game, is it really worth $500, because that's practically the only difference. I'm not going to be a hardcore gamer, but I'd like to be able to buy a game 3 years down the line and still play it, not necessarily on best graphics, but at least not running slugishly. I'll probably run Halo 2, battlefield 2142, half life 2, maybe crisis (about as high end of a game I'd ever run), etc. Is 512 really worth the extra $500 if I'm not a hardcore gamer?
2. Now or Montevina? Should i get one in a month when I can, or wait for this summer to get the Montevina update. I've heard the speeds not going to be much better and I know the processor will still be penryn, just a platform change. But does anyone see a new graphics card like say the 8800M being in it? or will it probably just be a 8600/8700 again. I thought about waiting too, to see what the probably eminent redesign will be. I LOVE the current design, but what if they make it thinner and add a magnetic latch??? However, the current design has almost all the bugs worked out, whereas a new design will have kinks to work out... So its a hard decision. Any input from you guys would be awesome. thanks. As of now, I'm leaning towards buying one in a month.
Where are people getting their information? "I heard the speeds not going to be much faster"?????? It isn't going to be the same processor it will be a predecessor still name Penryn but it will not be the same. I'm tired of typing the same ish over and over - I'm losing my mind. Get informed. Actually you know what, do what you want- get the current MBP which performed worse on nearly every benchmark than the MBP 2007 with overall performance below 2007's- that's what Intel & Apple are hoping for. The Santa Rosa is obsolete in three months, have fun with compatibility even 1 year down the road. This penryn was a premature, backwards compatible processor meant to help flush the market out of old technology. Front-end bus speed is THE most important criterion that bottlenecks how fast a computer can run- if you've "heard" otherwise then you are misinformed. "just a platform change"