Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would love a quad core iMac but I have a really good monitor that I spent 500 bucks on so if they did update the mini I would get that over the iMac and put 4GB of ram and a 64GB SSD with my 500GB 7200 drive, to make it nice and fasttttttttt :D
500 bucks buys you a 'really' good screen?! What size?
64gb SSD and 4gb RAM in the current low-end Mini equals a very fast computer for most things I do (games is on PS3 / MBP anyway).
 
Another thing; what's with all the Blu-Ray? I don't think it has seen wide adoption here in Denmark, outside of PS3 consoles, and I don't see it as very Apple-like to include it, as they heavily promote media content via iTunes (also tv-shows and movies).
Bu maybe it is huge state-side?
For me? The future is certainly no disc-based, whatever the format, it's streaming/online.
 
Can't wait to see the new Macbooks. :) Will be exciting.

New iMacs *should* have at least quad cores in them.

500 bucks buys you a 'really' good screen?! What size?

About a 24 inch widescreen. At least that's how much my brother's was.
 
Just about set to purchase my first iMac - and since all signs point to an imminent update, curious why the Macrumors buyers guide recommendations for the iMac hasn't been updated from Buy only if you need it - Approaching the end of a cycle instead of to Don't Buy - Updates soon
 
It is probably going to be a minor speed bump. I can see Apple totally eliminating the low end, and decreasing the price $100 for the high end. Besides, there is no difference between the high and low now, just a larger HD and an extra GB of RAM...all that for $200 plus tax?? What model did you buy?

I got the "low end" but i just bought 4 gigs for it for $65 but did not instal it yet
 
64ge9e.png
 
im guessing prices will stay the same but instead of only 1gb ram (are you kidding me?? why didnt apple put more in the first place..) there will be 2gb ram with a 2.2 cpu and probably 250gb hdd. for $599
 
Just about set to purchase my first iMac - and since all signs point to an imminent update, curious why the Macrumors buyers guide recommendations for the iMac hasn't been updated

Because it's based only on the average time between updates, and is probably just an automated script. (Which, sadly, doesn't read MacRumors articles. ;) )

--Eric
 
I would love a quad core iMac but I have a really good monitor that I spent 500 bucks on so if they did update the mini I would get that over the iMac and put 4GB of ram and a 64GB SSD with my 500GB 7200 drive, to make it nice and fasttttttttt :D
I'd buy a new iMac and connect your nice monitor to it. Nothing better then having two nice monitors side by side :)
 
im guessing prices will stay the same but instead of only 1gb ram (are you kidding me?? why didnt apple put more in the first place..) there will be 2gb ram with a 2.2 cpu and probably 250gb hdd. for $599

That sounds like the most likely Mac mini update to me as well. Given that it has (unfortunately) been the historical step-child on power and updates.

The current lineup of base mini vs so-called 'high end' mini costing $200 just for two changes: an extra 1 gig of Ram and an HD size increase (120G to 320G) is a travesty. :p

And through it all, I hope for a good update, as I would like to get a Mac mini after this upcoming update cycle. :D
 
The new high end mini will most likely be the same as now but with the current BTO higher chip speed.:)
 
I'd like to see the $599 Mini come standard with 2Gigs memory and 250Gig HD. Then I might bite.

Stop making sense. :)

Seriously, it sounds about right.

Or if Apple does come out with a $999 iMac, then making the only Mac Mini the current "plus" model (2.0GH / 2GB RAM / 320GB HDD) at $599 could be probable, as well.
 
Big Change!!!

In a little bit more than 4 hours it has now changed even more...from 1-3 days to a few weeks...definitely a refresh coming!!! :apple:
 

Attachments

  • Picture 2.png
    Picture 2.png
    26.5 KB · Views: 1,076
And if its a quiet update, its not going to be anything major... and if its nothing major, theres going to be a lot of disappointed posters on this forum.

No one has seen the pattern here?

Mac Pro and anything related; minimum press out it. iMac, Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro; medium to large press, you'll see a nice big splash image on apple.com, unless it's a major, major upgrade. iPhone, iPod; huge release.

Anyone care to guess as to why this is how it is? Think of it through a marketing perspective. Someone who wants a Mac Pro, as myself, knows what they want and will not settle for anything else. Huge customer loyalty. No need to persuade me, I'm buying it. The last release had the new processors, major architecture update and what did you see? Little button on apple.com.

iMac, Mac Mini, entry level Mac computers so they have the potential to bring in new Mac customers, unlike the Mac Pro, so there is more press related to this. But they can also be for the die hard Mac enthusiast so then it's a job of customer retention. Events won't be a common practice to release updates unless they're huge.

MacBook and MacBook Pro are kind of clumped into that last group but the technology behind a laptop is of more interest so you may see more press related to this. Lighter, smaller, faster, cooks your breakfast, etc.

iPods and iPhone is where Apple makes a killing. Everyone has one or wants one, so any chance to tighten that stranglehold, they'll take it. Hence the event to announce a new iTunes and a few features and new iPods. It's their gateway drug, so to speak.

With that being said, when they release an updated iMac, unless it's a phenomenal update, an event isn't really necessary.

Anyway, this is my observation and understanding. I could be wrong and they could release an iMac with four quad-cores and dual screens, blu-ray and a kitchen sink, but I doubt it.
 
im guessing prices will stay the same but instead of only 1gb ram (are you kidding me?? why didnt apple put more in the first place..) there will be 2gb ram with a 2.2 cpu and probably 250gb hdd. for $599

that would be great! although no matter what i'll upgrade the ram to 4gb. they might be released this coming tuesday, yay:p
 
Its funny on Apple desktops they make a really small mini & a 80lb monster tower mac pro & nothing in between....

Note: I'm only talking about desktops without monitors built in...
 
+1 . Very well put


No one has seen the pattern here?

Mac Pro and anything related; minimum press out it. iMac, Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro; medium to large press, you'll see a nice big splash image on apple.com, unless it's a major, major upgrade. iPhone, iPod; huge release.

Anyone care to guess as to why this is how it is? Think of it through a marketing perspective. Someone who wants a Mac Pro, as myself, knows what they want and will not settle for anything else. Huge customer loyalty. No need to persuade me, I'm buying it. The last release had the new processors, major architecture update and what did you see? Little button on apple.com.

iMac, Mac Mini, entry level Mac computers so they have the potential to bring in new Mac customers, unlike the Mac Pro, so there is more press related to this. But they can also be for the die hard Mac enthusiast so then it's a job of customer retention. Events won't be a common practice to release updates unless they're huge.

MacBook and MacBook Pro are kind of clumped into that last group but the technology behind a laptop is of more interest so you may see more press related to this. Lighter, smaller, faster, cooks your breakfast, etc.

iPods and iPhone is where Apple makes a killing. Everyone has one or wants one, so any chance to tighten that stranglehold, they'll take it. Hence the event to announce a new iTunes and a few features and new iPods. It's their gateway drug, so to speak.

With that being said, when they release an updated iMac, unless it's a phenomenal update, an event isn't really necessary.

Anyway, this is my observation and understanding. I could be wrong and they could release an iMac with four quad-cores and dual screens, blu-ray and a kitchen sink, but I doubt it.
 
Long live the all in one!

You just like having no say about your display... which means you have no idea what is good. either way, all-in-one = suck.

All apple makes is freaking laptops... then sticks them in different cases.

imac = laptop that doesn't fold
mini = laptop with no screen

i'm guessing mr. jerk jobs will never, ever give us a decent desktop that isn't that ridiculous top-end behemoth.

as long as the mini keeps its ridiculous little laptop drive and ZERO graphics, it will remain a FAIL. epic, epic fail. :(
 
Its funny on Apple desktops they make a really small mini & a 80lb monster tower mac pro & nothing in between....

Note: I'm only talking about desktops without monitors built in...

+1

Hopefully one of these days, Apple will make a configurable tower mac that starts at around $1000 instead of $2500. :(
 
You just like having no say about your display... which means you have no idea what is good. either way, all-in-one = suck.

All apple makes is freaking laptops... then sticks them in different cases.

imac = laptop that doesn't fold
mini = laptop with no screen

i'm guessing mr. jerk jobs will never, ever give us a decent desktop that isn't that ridiculous top-end behemoth.

as long as the mini keeps its ridiculous little laptop drive and ZERO graphics, it will remain a FAIL. epic, epic fail. :(

wow.... I actually completely disagree with you.

If the mac mini is such a failure, how come the resale value of them is so high, the refurb ones from the store sell out very quickly, and lots of people own one?
 
Another thing; what's with all the Blu-Ray? I don't think it has seen wide adoption here in Denmark, outside of PS3 consoles, and I don't see it as very Apple-like to include it, as they heavily promote media content via iTunes (also tv-shows and movies).
Bu maybe it is huge state-side?
For me? The future is certainly no disc-based, whatever the format, it's streaming/online.

Blu-ray is becoming pretty popular here in the US, but more importantly it is becoming a very big deal with those who author high definition content as it is really the easiest way to distribute full length HD material without requiring people to download 25-50GB.

I agree that Apple would like not to have to embrace Blu-ray (and it seems highly unlikely we will see it in a Mac for at least another year), but if the adoption rates pick up then eventually they will have little choice since the customers who use Macs to author audio/video material will stop buying the machines if they don't have this feature.

It is currently estimated by several marketing research companies that 47% of optical players sold in the US in 2009 will have Blu-ray playback capability. Software sales are still lagging (making up more like 10% of the optical market) but as players dip into the under $100 category and software starts to sink to DVD pricing it will really gain momentum.

As to the jump to downloads, I am fine with it as soon as it can match the quality of both picture and sound of Blu-Ray, which is a long ways off.

Downloads are fine for watching on a small screen with computer speakers but are completely inadequate for home theater use.

Try watching an HD iTunes download on a 65" Plasma TV with a high end home theater setup and compare it to a Blu-ray and you can see why consumers who don't even have high end setups have shown an interest in Blu-ray.
 
wow.... I actually completely disagree with you.

If the mac mini is such a failure, how come the resale value of them is so high, the refurb ones from the store sell out very quickly, and lots of people own one?

While i dont fully agree with what muskratboy says the high resale value is true of most macs. Many people pick a mini up to use as a media centre to hook up to their HDTV as they are well suited for this task, even more so than the :apple:TV
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.