(I've remerged the site feedback thread into this one)
Here's the official response from the site owner. Site policy about the talk of piracy has been very consistent over the years.
Here's a post I made in 2005
Someone posting their experiences with the Retail version of Leopard onto a public forum is newsworthy. People care about it, and that's why it is on the front page. Even that Retail Leopard has been leaked by itself is newsworthy and there will certainly be stories about it in the mainstream media later today.
I've posted this before, but a close parallel is AppleInsider's Leopard series. That information was obtained through a pirated version of Mac OS X Leopard Developer Seed. Almost certainly. It's unlikely that AppleInsider signed the NDA required to legally obtain Mac OS X Leopard.
Now, I understand that it may leave a bad taste in some people's mouths that the original source of this may likely have obtained a copy illegally. But this individual chose to do so and posted the information in a public forum. At that moment, the information contained was "out there" and of interest.
MacRumors did not ask that individual or any other individual to pirate Leopard to obtain any information.
I'm comfortable with this distinction, and still consider the information newsworthy.
arn
I don't think you should compare the in-depth AI articles to some incoherent ramblings of a random user but that's just me.
I guess the way it happened just left a bad taste in some people's mouth. I agree that it is of interest to hear about Leopard, I just don't think it was necessary to put a thread about a pirated version of Leopard of a user that has talked about pirating, etc. in the past on the front page, especially since it didn't really provide any info and it was so close to official release.
I just think it was bad judgement nothing else. I agree with the general idea of your argument though.