Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Does anyone else find it funny that they're using FireFox?

They are not using Firefox, they're using Safari 4.1 betas. Safari use Mozilla as part of their user strings.

This is Safari 4.0.4 user string on my machine,
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_2; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Safari/531.21.10
 
Never going to happen. Apple is not a customization friendly company. That's the whole point behind their design principles. If you don't like it, switch to MS or Linux which can provide you all the customization options you want but I can assure you 90% of Windows or Linux people don't customize their stuff even if they have the ability to. Most often than not the customizations do more harm than good due to the fact that it's not easy to customize anything and often break stuff.



Snow Leopard was not just a performance update.

It was a major core modernization for an OS core that was reaching a decade old. This can not be emphasized enough to show how hard it is to do that in any OS and we should be glad that it did not take more than two years to complete. It was not suppose to bring any new features, so you can't compare it to Leopard or Tiger either. Grand Central and OpenCL are not something you can "pad" on any OS, it requires a significant amount of changes to the core in order to work well. It'll also take a few years for many developers to start taking advantage of those features. There are hundreds of thousands of changes in the core that none of us can see, feel but will experience in later releases of OS and the new generation of 10.6+ applications.

The applications are not part of the core development teams, they are being constantly updated by the respective teams that works in alignment with the core team.

"a self-serving update on Apples part they basically had us pay for them to clean up their own house, not that I mind it was priced low enough and they did release it before doing another update focused on new features."

Would you rather wait 5-8 years instead?

It was really. Every change in Snow Leopard was made for Performance reasons either today or for tomorrow. If it wasn't there would be no reason to make them in the first place. You even mentioned Grand Central and OpenCL. What are these technologies for? Parallelism so that we can process code FASTER. aka more performance.

And I dunno why you are saying things like 'Would you rather wait 5-8 years instead' it took them 2 years there is no need to theorise about how long it would have taken to get these performance tweaks because we already have them and as I already clearly stated I was happy to pay for the performance update that Snow Leopard is.

I swear some people on this forum need to chill out, it's just an operating system.
 
This reinforces my belief that 10.5 and 10.6 were stopgap OS's and were poorly supported as a result, making 10.4.11 the only current stable release.

10.7 will operate on a new paradigm, free of mice and keyboards, but what of the "old" computers?

Do we get 10.4.12? Something at least aware of the features and services in 10.5 and 10.6 so you can at least have separate CPU's (instances) running software you purchased that is specific to those environments?

Hey Apple, love you, but will you please forsake the past just a bit less, and let us stably run what you brung in the past while we cheerfully buy the future?

Please? Remember, even the Mac is an "ecosystem".

Thank you.

Rocketman
 
heh. I wouldn't be surprised if they drop support for single-core machines.
Dropping support for single core machine's would be artificially ending their lifecycle. I can see them dropping support for all 32-bit machines though, to clean up the code. the number of cores shouldn't matter though.

Most cocoa "good citizen" apps could easily be removed fully by the system removing the preferences and any files in /Application Support/.

I imagine a system wide uninstaller would be kind of hard to get perfect, but Apple could do better than they are doing now.

Like Garageband? ;)
 
I've had to click the + every time to search for images since Leopard came out. I never had to do that on Tiger once with the old Show All.

Sorting by kind sorts alphabetically by file extension instead of sorting by file type. Sorting by date is still broken in the Open/Save dialog. There is no more column view when doing a Spotlight search.

It's like they don't want me to buy a Mac again. That or use Tiger and Leopard for the rest of my life.

"Sorting by kind sorts alphabetically by file extension instead of sorting by file type."

Maybe this is how they see it.

"Sorting by date is still broken in the Open/Save dialog"

Fine on my Mac (SL 10.6.2).

"There is no more column view when doing a Spotlight search."

Column view rules. Too bad it's not available.

"I've had to click the + every time to search for images since Leopard came out."

You mean clicking "+" and selecting "Kind is Image"?
 
You mean clicking "+" and selecting "Kind is Image"?
Yep. I also updated my previous post with my observations.

In addition icon preview of images doesn't work when doing a Spotlight search in an Open file dialog. It doesn't under Leopard either.
 
It was really. Every change in Snow Leopard was made for Performance reasons either today or for tomorrow. If it wasn't there would be no reason to make them in the first place. You even mentioned Grand Central and OpenCL. What are these technologies for? Parallelism so that we can process code FASTER. aka more performance.

And I dunno why you are saying things like 'Would you rather wait 5-8 years instead' it took them 2 years there is no need to theorise about how long it would have taken to get these performance tweaks because we already have them and as I already clearly stated I was happy to pay for the performance update that Snow Leopard is.

I swear some people on this forum need to chill out, it's just an operating system.

It took them two years to do the core modernization, it'll take them another 1-3 years to add on features (3-6 years is more accurate, my bad). My point was that they do not have to release SL. They could've just make us wait for 10.7 instead if people want a feature packed OS update.

Your definition of a performance update is the difference between our opinions of what Snow Leopard is. If Leopard did not have GCD and OpenCL code in the first place, it is not a performance update, they are new features (or new technologies) along with QTX, Exchange Support and so on. Snow Leopard wasn't a simple change is what I was saying. You made it sound like it's something Apple could've done in a 10.4.x update.
 
So if you enter your search string without selecting "Kind is Image" it returns no images?
I have to set kind as images every time I want to search for images. It's the ONLY way to find images that I have tagged. I can't just do a broad search every time like I did in Tiger and use the Show All.

Show All is is disaster post-Tiger and sorting doesn't make any sense to me. I've even cut down on what file types Spotlight indexes and put images to the top of my general searches. The problem is that I have to use Show All and then it doesn't sort effectively by last opened because the Last Opened isn't updated.

The only real solution I can think of is always a workaround from what I did in Tiger or disabling indexing for everything but images.
 
Edit: OS X died a little for me when they got rid of this.

That search interface was decent and I thought they would build on it with Leopard. Instead it got scrapped altogether. Bad decision.

Edit: And I have sent feedback about this, so there is not much more I can do save encouraging you to do likewise.
 
I have to set kind as images every time I want to search for images. It's the ONLY way to find images that I have tagged. I can't just do a broad search every time like I did in Tiger and use the Show All.

Show All is is disaster post-Tiger and sorting doesn't make any sense to me. I've even cut down on what file types Spotlight indexes and put images to the top of my general searches. The problem is that I have to use Show All and then it doesn't sort effectively by last opened because the Last Opened isn't updated.

The only real solution I can think of is always a workaround from what I did in Tiger or disabling indexing for everything but images.

What about smart folders? Why can't you just use that if you constantly search for images? I just open Finder, find command+f, typed kind:images, it works fine.
 
What about smart folders? Why can't you just use that if you constantly search for images?
Extra work compared to IT JUST WORKED in Tiger.

I might was well not use Cmd + Space then and always use a Smart Folder in the sidebar. I've been toying with that for years though.

Show All in Spotlight is just a disgrace now though.
 
I have to set kind as images every time I want to search for images. It's the ONLY way to find images that I have tagged. I can't just do a broad search every time like I did in Tiger and use the Show All.

Show All is is disaster post-Tiger and sorting doesn't make any sense to me. I've even cut down on what file types Spotlight indexes and put images to the top of my general searches. The problem is that I have to use Show All and then it doesn't sort effectively by last opened because the Last Opened isn't updated.

The only real solution I can think of is always a workaround from what I did in Tiger or disabling indexing for everything but images.

Tagged? How? As Spotlight comment for that file/s?
 
Tagged? How? As Spotlight comment for that file/s?
I've been tagging all my image files with Spotlight comments since 2005. Regretfully I can only remember what I have sorted by date for only about a 1,000 files in a folder. I'd rather give Spotlight that job.
 
Dropping support for single core machine's would be artificially ending their lifecycle. I can see them dropping support for all 32-bit machines though, to clean up the code. the number of cores shouldn't matter though.

There are no x64 capable single core systems. There are no "Core 2 Solo" CPUs in any Apple systems.

The x86-only single and dual cores are older than PowerPC systems that have been axed.
 
Might be a little soon to expect 10.7. I would imagine Apple would want to slow down a little bit and maybe dedicate this year to working further with developers on the iPhone and possibly the mythical tablet OS, then in 2011 bring 10.7 in the mix.
 
Snow Leopard was not just a performance update.

It was a major core modernization for an OS core that was reaching a decade old. This can not be emphasized enough to show how hard it is to do that in any OS and we should be glad that it did not take more than two years to complete. It was not suppose to bring any new features, so you can't compare it to Leopard or Tiger either. Grand Central and OpenCL are not something you can "pad" on any OS, it requires a significant amount of changes to the core in order to work well. It'll also take a few years for many developers to start taking advantage of those features. There are hundreds of thousands of changes in the core that none of us can see, feel but will experience in later releases of OS and the new generation of 10.6+ applications.

The applications are not part of the core development teams, they are being constantly updated by the respective teams that works in alignment with the core team.

"a self-serving update on Apples part they basically had us pay for them to clean up their own house, not that I mind it was priced low enough and they did release it before doing another update focused on new features."

Would you rather wait 5-8 years instead?

Regretfully, you're only partially right--the major core upgrade came with the original Leopard 10.5. If you study the background, you'll discover that 10.5 was certified as a full version of UNIX, no longer linked to BSD. That is also why Leopard had so many issues, because core permissions changed on nearly every file and app format. Snow Leopard finally took out the legacy PPC code, streamlining the OS by eliminating the code redundancy and further tightening the permissions and ultimately tightening the security as well. Granted, there will always be vulnerabilities, but as long as Apple actively works to close the vulnerabilities, I doubt we will see too many effective attacks against OS X.

The underpinnings for everything you mention--OpenCL, GrandCentral, all of it--were created in Leopard, but couldn't be activated until the PPC code could be removed in order to simplify and streamline the OS.
 
I've been tagging all my image files with Spotlight comments since 2005. Regretfully I can only remember what I have sorted by date for only about a 1,000 files in a folder. I'd rather give Spotlight that job.

Well I have just added tags to 100 images and Spotlight finds them every time and I didn't change search parameter to "Kind is Image". It also works fine using boolean parameters.
 
For those of you who is going to say that Apple has to add more engineers, trust me, that's never a sure thing. Finding smart engineers is like finding a needle in a haystack. It's not impossible but will take a long time. There's no way you can add on 100-200 engineers expecting they'll put out a good code, you're lucky to find at least 10 in that group.

Since iPhone development ramped up, Apple has delayed one desktop OS release twice (10.5) and shipped a less-resource intensive "maintenance release” with 10.6.

If they haven’t figured out how to manage their engineering resources by now … shame on them.

Microsoft’s current roadmap has Windows 8 launching in early 2012. Apple will want to beat that. If 10.7 doesn’t come in Spring 2011, it’ll come in Fall 2011.
 
Since 10.6 Is Now Perfect - Time To Move On?

10.6 is probably the worst 10.x since 10.0. Lots of problems and unhappy people.

People want things to "just work" again, not new eye candy and rearranging of the GUI.

WHY DON'T YOU FIX WHAT YOU STARTED/BROKE BEFORE STARTING SOMETHING NEW????!!!!!!!:mad:

I have been a Mac user for 18 years. The Mac experience used to be far superior and things truly did "just work".

Not any more.

My patience with Apple is wearing thin....
 
2) a way to use the power of the GPU to play HD movies (especially x.264 MKVs) in third party players, either in the "GPU-decoding way" (like UVD/Purevideo+DXVA in Windows) or in the "GPGPU way" (like CoreAVC 2.0 with CUDA support in Windows); I know that QuickTimeX supports h.264 video acceleration on 9400M GPUs but that's useless for common x.264 MKVs...

That already exists in Snow Leopard you fool. It's called OpenCL. You need to badger some "lazy developers" to update their software to make use of said OpenCL goodness.
 
I want:

-new filesystem, hopefully ZFS
Never going to happen - ZFS was killed due to licensing.
-enhanced interface
Hope so!
-make it so that i can use the arrow keys to switch buttons (like from continue to cancel) on windows
Definitely not. Tab key is the Mac way of doing it.
-phase out 32bit and have longterm support for snow leopard
Why? Having 32-bit support doesn't hurt as long as 64-bit is full.
-completely 64 bit os
Already in Snow Leopard.
-more speed improvements
Always.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.