theres in option in the expose menu to change it back to the old view
Thank goodness and thank you for that tip.
theres in option in the expose menu to change it back to the old view
iOS meets Mac OS.....they shall Coexist![]()
The total drain of color. For the new OS X I could get by with a grayscale monitor. What gives with the removal of all colors from the interface? I waited 20 years for this evolution? Windows looks much better. The Finder and other core apps look lifeless. If this is what Apple is doing, I am switch back to Windows. Thank gosh for Boot Camp.
Funny how my post suggesting a mere 2GB was insufficient, was attacked with a vengeance, only to have it validated several weeks later. One thing I find entertaining in the Mac Eco system, there is never a lack of venom spewing characters.This build is a memory hog which easily eats up 3GB RAM. I'm lucky to have a 4GB RAM in MBA
This is the best example of GUI inconsistency yet. Following the new logic, the B, I and U are all selected/pressed. You have to watch closely to realize that's not true, because B, I and U are buttons instead of a slider. But at first glance this is not apparent. Bad move, Apple.
theres in option in the expose menu to change it back to the old view
edit: didn't read your full post before but lion is actually faster on an external hard drive than slow leopard is on my internal harddrive atleast for me
But the point is that just because you think the words are "pointless" and you don't think the words are "essential" to the marketplace of ideas, doesn't mean others agree. And as soon as you start putting the onus on the speaker to have to self-censor instead of on the listener to change the channel, you have put a chill on speech that acts as a form of "prior restraint" that will inevitably result in the expression of fewer ideas (not all of them will be good ideas - most may not - but unless expressed we'll never know).
The total drain of color. For the new OS X I could get by with a grayscale monitor. What gives with the removal of all colors from the interface? I waited 20 years for this evolution? Windows looks much better. The Finder and other core apps look lifeless. If this is what Apple is doing, I am switch back to Windows. Thank gosh for Boot Camp.
The reason for the small number of options in Mac OS is simplicity.
Choosing simplicity over flexibility doesn't make it objectively better (or worse). You get to decide.
I agree 100%. I love colour, that's why, when I got my first iPod Touch, I jailbroke it - just to have a background.
With iTunes you can change the grey icons back to colour. And if people can do that, there's nothing stopping them doing that to other apps as well - even changing the icons - like a theme.
Just look at itunes. You can't immediately spot things by color anymore.. step down
I don't know about the "quick look", but I know alt tab sucks in Mac OS compared to Windows. I would rather alt tab cycle every window vs every application.
I also like the scroll bars but wonder how things work for people who don't have a wheel on their mouse (especially for landscape scrolling which is still not common?).
Not hard, but much harder than double clicking a photo...
That's crazy talk -- it would make the feature unusable if you habitually have a lot of document windows open in one or more applications. What's the problem with CMD-TAB to get (quickly) to the application you're looking for, and then CMD-Tilde to cycle through the windows of that application?
If you're so unsure of what you're looking for that you don't know which application or document window you need, then Exposé -> All Windows is a better solution than using a keyboard shortcut to cycle through all the open windows on your computer.
Cheers
Jim