m2 is build in another mfg line since its 4nm, it won't interfere with the current m1 5nm mfg line.
Isn’t this debatable. M1 was supposedly based on A14 and M2 is supposed to be based on A15. These are 5nm chips. A16 is rumored to be 4nm.
m2 is build in another mfg line since its 4nm, it won't interfere with the current m1 5nm mfg line.
The marketing department sells more upgrades to the amateur this way.Pro means for professional, I guess there are different level of being pro.
I can live making video or I can work for Holywood....very different scenario and requirements.
Also, it's a marketing thing, people read pro and assume it's better......heck we have "Pro" phones and....
I think many "Pro" user would be good with the "entry level".
What does make something Pro or not.... it's so borderline, I see lots of pro users running base model machines.
Got you to read the post and comment on it, didn't it?why MR reports on DigiTimes is beyond me. I’ve been on this site for over 15 years. DigiTimes is ridiculously unreliable and just annoying at this point. Bet my left whatever that there’s no M2 MBP next month. ?
If M2 comes then M2 Pro and Max would be right behind it which is probably what people fear. Of course technologies will keep evolving but people who buy expensive stuff suddenly wish the technology slows down once they buy their product.
And what exactly makes a machine “Pro” or not?"Entry level Pro Model" a sentence that should not even exist. Either something is a "Pro" or it is not.
Or Apple can't think of a better branding for the newer MBPs.It's bizarre that Apple still can't think of better branding for this mid-range model than "Pro".
Returning to the origins means calling it the PowerBook.I think they should return to the origins and this model should be called "Macbook", "Macbook" for all the 13" versions (including Air) and "Macbook Pro" for 14" and 16"
You never know. They have a decent track record when it comes to the supply chains.Its digitimes, so 0% chances that M2 Mbp or any M2 mac will come next month
Can you imagine bringing Touch Bar back and Apple charging us $299 for the feature to be added 😱Touchbar!
There have been varying rumors on this front. One such rumor is that the M series will be based off of even-numbered A series chips (much like the X variants before) with Macs being updated roughly every 18 months. The M2 would therefore then be based on the upcoming A16 microarchitecture and the 4nm process node. If the M2 doesn't debut until summer/fall then the timing works out as A16 production would be up and running by then.Isn’t this debatable. M1 was supposedly based on A14 and M2 is supposed to be based on A15. These are 5nm chips. A16 is rumored to be 4nm.
I agree with you on that. I feel like the majority of the MacBook 💻 lineup will occur in the fall. Maybe this is just a SE model of the 💻?mmm, I really think that this has no sense at all... The M2 presentation will occur on October 2022
MacRumors have been sharing some nice deals lately. You might as well save some money. I don’t see an iMac or Air coming during the Spring event. It’s probably going to be during the summer and fall at the latest.I hope this is false, I was about to drive 30 miles today to get a 14 Pro because I need a machine and I’m tired of waiting for the iMac and the M2 Air and concluded there was no way in hell it would release this spring.
Exactly. Im still waiting to pick mine up in the store.They can barely get the M1 chips out the door and these guys think the M2 is coming next month? Yeah right.
just get the double binned 14” then?Are we no longer expecting a 14” MBP with M2?
Making a redesigned 13” entry level MBP alongside a redesigned presumably 13” MBA seems pretty wasteful. Seems like it would make more sense to reuse the 14” chassis with maybe some cheaper options (like no promotion) and put an M2 in that.
I just want a 14” MBP with the same legendary battery life as the M1 (non-pro) laptops plus the ability to support multiple external displays. I don’t need crazy CPU/ graphics performance. I need ports and battery life. I can’t be the only one for whom the current 14”/16” MBP are overkill but the MBA isn’t quite enough (mainly cause of ports/lack of external display support).
I agree. They are the worst and MR keeps giving them credibility. Usually as soon as I see it from DT I just move on and don't even read the article.why MR reports on DigiTimes is beyond me. I’ve been on this site for over 15 years. DigiTimes is ridiculously unreliable and just annoying at this point. Bet my left whatever that there’s no M2 MBP next month. ?
So, by your logic, there would be a single MacBook Pro model. The highest model is Pro. The 14" model would not be "Pro" either because it has a smaller display.So a „MacBook“ then