No, you are not right, those are the same results that have been there since yesterday. And like others have already pointed out, Geekbench is not reporting the number of compute units correctly - for example it reports the M1 with a 7-core GPU as 8 core GPU.I was right; the benchmark was done on the 32c gpu M1 Max.
More results have since appeared on Geekbench that explicitly mention 32c: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/search?utf8=✓&q=MacBookPro18
What would a 5700xt equivalent GPU cost in a desktop pc right now? Trying to justify the $200 upcharge from apple to go from 16core igpu to 24core
$500-$600 in today's market?
look at the L2 cache numbers, they don't match M1 Pro or M1 MaxI was right; the benchmark was done on the 32c gpu M1 Max.
More results have since appeared on Geekbench that explicitly mention 32c: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/search?utf8=✓&q=MacBookPro18
Still pretty cool to see a $200 upcharge from Apple equivalent to a $400 desktop gpu. (I realize you're technically subtracting out their 16core model which maybe is like a 1660 or so)You can still buy $400 3060ti Founders Edition when they drop at Best Buy which is faster than 5700xt.
It clearly says M1 Max with 32 iGPU cores, 10 CPU cores and 64GB RAM. It's expected of companies to send their best to reviewers.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/3551790
View attachment 1873508
Doesn't say which one is 24 coers and 32 cores.I was right; the benchmark was done on the 32c gpu M1 Max.
More results have since appeared on Geekbench that explicitly mention 32c: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/search?utf8=✓&q=MacBookPro18
The Geekbench CPU and GPU info is usually not very reliable, they often mix things uplook at the L2 cache numbers, they don't match M1 Pro or M1 Max
I was right; the benchmark was done on the 32c gpu M1 Max.
More results have since appeared on Geekbench that explicitly mention 32c: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/search?utf8=✓&q=MacBookPro18
1. So are the new macbooks already available to see at Apple stores? Or it will happen also after 25th?
You should look into the future and not just to Mac users... An iPad as most of the same hardware...
Other companies innovating or having better hardware doesn’t stop the fact that once hardware is good enough there will be market opportunities for game developers.
Doesn’t mean that Apple will get exactly the same games, or that gamers will immediately flock to Apple, but it changes the dynamics and gives people more options, and starts rolling money
if you look at the OpenCL scores under OpenCL Information it shows Compute Units. The problem is that information has not been reliable with the M1 - it doesn’t report 7 for 7-core GPU. So we cannot trust the numberDoesn't say which one is 24 coers and 32 cores.
Still pretty cool to see a $200 upcharge from Apple equivalent to a $400 desktop gpu. (I realize you're technically subtracting out their 16core model which maybe is like a 1660 or so)
didn’t argue that an iPad could be compared to a top PC, what I argued was about how the quality of the hardware has improved to the point where there is a market for something more than typical mobile games.Not until Tuesday per my nearest store.
And an iPad is hardly a game machine to compare to PCs. Porting an iPad game to a MBP would hardly set the world on fire.
The question is there profit in the market? The answer for most is probably not. Hardware alone won't drive a market, you need people who will buy your product and the Mac market is simply so small to make it unattractive, even with good hardware. Plus, you're limited to lower end MB's as the main target since that's where most Mac buyers land.
Only time will tell but I doubt Macs will ever see the same level of gaming as a PC. Even now the mMac games are what, 13% of the games on the EPIC store? At best Macs will likely see mid tier games get a port.
A15 is also based on A14 thus M1, mainly benefitting from the better node 5NM+ which the M1Pro and Max are also using, so makes this choice a bit weird if it's true. Personally it disappoints me to buy one year old stuff for this price but probably this stuff was meant to be introduced Q1/2 this year.
Most of the scores he listed are OpenCL. NOT COMPARABLE.57k and 69k , sort of big difference
Not until Tuesday per my nearest store.
And an iPad is hardly a game machine to compare to PCs. Porting an iPad game to a MBP would hardly set the world on fire.
The question is there profit in the market? The answer for most is probably not. Hardware alone won't drive a market, you need people who will buy your product and the Mac market is simply so small to make it unattractive, even with good hardware. Plus, you're limited to lower end MB's as the main target since that's where most Mac buyers land.
Only time will tell but I doubt Macs will ever see the same level of gaming as a PC. Even now the mMac games are what, 13% of the games on the EPIC store? At best Macs will likely see mid tier games get a port.
Cannot use the t word or the mods will suspend me, but I see you’re doing your best to start a flame war to gain attention while you move the football and do your same old song and dance.M1 Max 32-core iGPU is more like a 1660 from all the results seen.
if you look at the OpenCL scores under OpenCL Information it shows Compute Units. The problem is that information has not been reliable with the M1 - it doesn’t report 7 for 7-core GPU. So we cannot trust the number
It's not even released yet.M1 Max 32-core iGPU is more like a 1660 from all the results seen.
Some additional info
I prefer real world tests.GFXBench is worst of garbage. Even more so than Geekbench.
why is that?GFXBench is worst of garbage. Even more so than Geekbench.