I don't understand how they can remove 2 ports, not add the standard SD port on all of their other consumer machines, and still charge $999 for it.
This is how. Would probably pay $1,999 for it.

I don't understand how they can remove 2 ports, not add the standard SD port on all of their other consumer machines, and still charge $999 for it.
£687.70 as standard and (+£69 for 4GB, so £756.70 total), better to buy standard and get crucial ram to save coin![]()
Target Disk Mode alone is worth it.
Will you buy ANY Mac, that cannot reliably transfer video, cannot reliably use an external portable HD without a separate power adaptor or engaging BOTH USB ports, cannot be easily recovered after a severe software crash accessing its internal HD in firewire target disk mode?
How much of mass production industrial costs did Apple save removing the FireWire (at least 400) port? 50 cents? 1$?
What's that sound? It's cannibalization...
So basically you're paying $200 for a FW port, SD card slot, and a smaller hard drive on the 13" MBP now....
Why does Apple display their white products on white backgrounds? So hard to see.....
I do not understand why they haven't made this work via USB. It's a great feature and if it just pretended to be a USB 2.0 drive, it'd be acceptable to me...
Gary
http://GarySaid.com/
What the hells with the £50 price increase in the uk
I mean it looks great but not 50 more great ....
I'm quite annoyed tbh
I can't afford another 50 I've been saving for ages...
999 dollars is 605 pounds surely they could make it 699 then not 799
it's cheaper to hve one shipped from the us....!
Where's my Credit Card?
Oh wait, still $999? Seriously?
Why not $749. That seems like a better price.
If you wan't a "Pro" Macbook, that is just a FW and SD slot, a retrolit keyboard and 2GB more, you just have to pay 500$ more !
.
I do not understand why they haven't made this work via USB. It's a great feature and if it just pretended to be a USB 2.0 drive, it'd be acceptable to me...
Gary
http://GarySaid.com/
Where's my Credit Card?
Oh wait, still $999? Seriously?
Why not $749. That seems like a better price.
1. The majority of consumer video is not transferred over FireWire, but instead via SD or other solid state storage. It has been moving this way for a while now, and eventually all consumer video cameras will record to some form of solid state media.
2. I have several external HDs that don't require the use of both USB ports, and don't require external power supplies. Sure my FW800 drive is faster, but for consumers the difference is tiny, and most won't know to buy FW devices even if they had FW.
3. It's been removed to differentiate between the consumer MacBook, and prosumer MacBook Pro. Also, the HD is still accessible by opening the MacBook, and you can buy a £20 gadget to access it on another computer.
£687.70 as standard and (+£69 for 4GB, so £756.70 total), better to buy standard and get crucial ram to save coin![]()
What the hells with the £50 price increase in the uk
I mean it looks great but not 50 more great ....
I'm quite annoyed tbh
I can't afford another 50 I've been saving for ages...
999 dollars is 605 pounds surely they could make it 699 then not 799
it's cheaper to hve one shipped from the us....!
1. It's not important how the "majority" transfers video. For sure, it is stupid to keep out all the others, only to save some cents, perhaps 1$ of industrial cost.