Clearly you've never held a real brick.Heavy as two bricks.
If you keep throwing logic out the window like this, you're going to break it.
Clearly you've never held a real brick.Heavy as two bricks.
Will that eGPU be able to drive a Apple 30" Cinema Display? That's what's currently connected to my MacPro 5,1They are crazy expensive right now but i just got a sapphire pulse 560(from newegg) which is recommended by apple and it works perfectly. Much more affordable and lower power than the 570 and 580 which is nice.
Windows 10 requirements:
View attachment 764458
These look like the specs of an average 2004 computer.
At that moment we knew many would be shopped for MacOS.I was wondering about this...they were quick to point out how iOS 12 would be compatible with all devices capable of running iOS 11, but, said nothing about macOS.
Bottom line? I think, yes, in the very short run (next two years), iOS and macOS will be separate. In three years? No, I don't believe Apple's plans are to maintain separation between iOS and macOS. There are too many upsides to merging the OSes. And iOS is (IMHO) so good right now, they need only make a few changes to iPad software and hardware and I'd easily be able to abandon the Mac platform.?
There is no macOS & iOS integration going on, the only thing they announced was developer ability to port iOS apps into macOS apps coming in 2019. ...If you saw the keynote, he said macOS and iOS will continue to be separate entities.
My classic mid 2012 mbp lives on lol
I don't get this argument, all I've heard about Windows tablets is that it is disadvantageous to have one OS for both mobile and desktops.Bottom line? I think, yes, in the very short run (next two years), iOS and macOS will be separate. In three years? No, I don't believe Apple's plans are to maintain separation between iOS and macOS. There are too many upsides to merging the OSes. And iOS is (IMHO) so good right now, they need only make a few changes to iPad software and hardware and I'd easily be able to abandon the Mac platform.
So, in 2018, my choice is to invest $3K into a platform (Mac and macOS) where Apple seems to be making slow progress, or invest that $3K in the latest, maxed out iPad Pro coming this year, and a decent PC.
It's too bad that my mid-2010 iMac—which still runs as well as the day I got it—will not be able to run Mojave. Fair, though; the thing is nearly eight years old.
For those whose devices will not run Mojave: do not fret; this is not the "end of the road" for your computers! Indeed, so long as Apple continues to support High Sierra (likely for two more years) your device ought not to be considered obsolete.
EDIT: and yes, while my iMac was indeed ~$2,500 back in 2010, the reality is that I have had no problems with it in eight years. Absolutely none. That to me is worth the Apple price premium. I'll gladly buy another iMac a couple years down the line.
Close call for my 2013 MBP as well. Probably will be dropped next year.phew i read 2012 and my heart stopped for a second. got a late 2012 mbp
Your MBP runs High Sierra and will get security updates for some time. I have a Mac Mini that also got left behind, but frankly I was expecting it. It works fine on High Sierra and will for some time to come, so I'm not going to get all dramatic about it.Ah well... My 2011 MBP is officially old now and this makes me reconsider buying a Windows machine to replace it instead of a new Mac... If that's not planned obsolescence I don't know what it is. Longevity is one of the big advantages of owning a Mac but sadly it seems that they'd rather have a dark mode and a bunch of users forced to upgrade -> $$$.
OH, so you're the one person who loves "lighter and thinner at the expense of everything else". Sadly Apple is catering to people like you above all these days... and we're all living with the results.Heavy as two bricks.
Dropping support for seven year old macs? Outrage!
Microsoft screwed the pooch when they first tried to have one OS for their phones, tablets, and traditional computers. First, with Windows 8, they just threw the UI out there. It was a very nice UI for mobile and portable, but YouTube was plastered with those "watch seniors try to use Windows 8" videos, because it was not intuitive if you were not using a touch device.I don't get this argument, all I've heard about Windows tablets is that it is disadvantageous to have one OS for both mobile and desktops.
Mobile = battery, user touch & voice interface
Desktop = plug-in(/large battery), user keyboard, trackpad, mouse
They are just two entirely different platforms. There is no way they will merge iOS & macOS, they keep saying it, not sure why people don't believe it. The people that use Macs for video editing, science or music creation are not with you on this.
Versatile like USB-C ports that support literally every I/O imaginable including power and use the same connector for all of them? Your way sounds pretty inconvenient unless your gripe is that you don't want to buy a few cables on Amazon.Oh, you're a charmer.
And I also drive a 2004 Honda Accord, in case you're interested. I suppose that makes me an old fogie (though I grew up in the 90's) but sexy as modern tech might be, it taketh away as much as it giveth, and I don't like a computer without versatile I/O components any more than I like a car that thinks for me. I'll do my own thinking, thankyouverymuch.![]()
Dropping support for seven year old macs? Outrage!
That's a shame. My Sandy Bridge i7-2600K PC runs Win 10 amazingly well.What you fail to notice from just reading the specs is that, for example, AMD never released a official Windows 10 driver for their pre-GCN graphics. This means that they were obsoleted in 2015. This is the exact same situation as Apple: a Sandy Bridge iMac can't run Windows 10, something that happened 3 years earlier.
Windows support is contingent on hardware vendor support, which often bails earlier than Apple does.
Ah well... My 2011 MBP is officially old now and this makes me reconsider buying a Windows machine to replace it instead of a new Mac... If that's not planned obsolescence I don't know what it is. Longevity is one of the big advantages of owning a Mac but sadly it seems that they'd rather have a dark mode and a bunch of users forced to upgrade -> $$$.
It would be even better, if they would offer a GPU-replacement for these. It's i7 CPU benchmarks are still nothing to complain about. However, in two years time it will be a worthless paperweight because it will be unsafe to use for anything practical...