Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They are crazy expensive right now but i just got a sapphire pulse 560(from newegg) which is recommended by apple and it works perfectly. Much more affordable and lower power than the 570 and 580 which is nice.
Will that eGPU be able to drive a Apple 30" Cinema Display? That's what's currently connected to my MacPro 5,1
 
In the past Apple dropped support for older machines due to a small hardware limitation, usually related to the cpu and supported instruction sets. Does anyone know what the limitation is this time?
[doublepost=1528151927][/doublepost]
Windows 10 requirements:
View attachment 764458
These look like the specs of an average 2004 computer.

yea, but those specs don't tell the whole story. First, those minimum specs, I'm pretty sure, are for installations like W10 embedded, where fancy features won't run. Second, a 1ghz computer today is different than a 1ghz computer in 2004. 1ghz in 2004 meant an Intel Celeron or something. Today's equivalent low end Intel CPUs would destroy those, even with the same clock speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
aw well i guess it's finally time for EOL on feature updates for my MBP 2011. really sad. especially since: i. just. will. not. buy. a 2012+ crapmacbook pro...
 
I was wondering about this...they were quick to point out how iOS 12 would be compatible with all devices capable of running iOS 11, but, said nothing about macOS.
At that moment we knew many would be shopped for MacOS.
 
?

There is no macOS & iOS integration going on, the only thing they announced was developer ability to port iOS apps into macOS apps coming in 2019. ...If you saw the keynote, he said macOS and iOS will continue to be separate entities.
Bottom line? I think, yes, in the very short run (next two years), iOS and macOS will be separate. In three years? No, I don't believe Apple's plans are to maintain separation between iOS and macOS. There are too many upsides to merging the OSes. And iOS is (IMHO) so good right now, they need only make a few changes to iPad software and hardware and I'd easily be able to abandon the Mac platform.

So, in 2018, my choice is to invest $3K into a platform (Mac and macOS) where Apple seems to be making slow progress, or invest that $3K in the latest, maxed out iPad Pro coming this year, and a decent PC.
 
Bottom line? I think, yes, in the very short run (next two years), iOS and macOS will be separate. In three years? No, I don't believe Apple's plans are to maintain separation between iOS and macOS. There are too many upsides to merging the OSes. And iOS is (IMHO) so good right now, they need only make a few changes to iPad software and hardware and I'd easily be able to abandon the Mac platform.

So, in 2018, my choice is to invest $3K into a platform (Mac and macOS) where Apple seems to be making slow progress, or invest that $3K in the latest, maxed out iPad Pro coming this year, and a decent PC.
I don't get this argument, all I've heard about Windows tablets is that it is disadvantageous to have one OS for both mobile and desktops.

Mobile = battery, user touch & voice interface
Desktop = plug-in(/large battery), user keyboard, trackpad, mouse

They are just two entirely different platforms. There is no way they will merge iOS & macOS, they keep saying it, not sure why people don't believe it. The people that use Macs for video editing, science or music creation are not with you on this.
 
It's too bad that my mid-2010 iMac—which still runs as well as the day I got it—will not be able to run Mojave. Fair, though; the thing is nearly eight years old.

For those whose devices will not run Mojave: do not fret; this is not the "end of the road" for your computers! Indeed, so long as Apple continues to support High Sierra (likely for two more years) your device ought not to be considered obsolete.

EDIT: and yes, while my iMac was indeed ~$2,500 back in 2010, the reality is that I have had no problems with it in eight years. Absolutely none. That to me is worth the Apple price premium. I'll gladly buy another iMac a couple years down the line.

Got my iMac 21.” In August 2010!

Still runs just as fast today as when I first got it. It’s awesome. Also cost over $2K.

Only issue I had was that the screen would flicker to all black randomly or when I watched videos. That stopped several years ago.

I love it, but do want a new iMac when the next redesign happens.
 
Love it. Their new OS illustrates the reality that a current Apple product is just two years away from being obsolete. Well on the bright side, at least we know for sure that the current Mac Mini will be replaced or discontinued in the next couple of years.
 
Ah well... My 2011 MBP is officially old now and this makes me reconsider buying a Windows machine to replace it instead of a new Mac... If that's not planned obsolescence I don't know what it is. Longevity is one of the big advantages of owning a Mac but sadly it seems that they'd rather have a dark mode and a bunch of users forced to upgrade -> $$$.
Your MBP runs High Sierra and will get security updates for some time. I have a Mac Mini that also got left behind, but frankly I was expecting it. It works fine on High Sierra and will for some time to come, so I'm not going to get all dramatic about it.
[doublepost=1528153323][/doublepost]
Heavy as two bricks.
OH, so you're the one person who loves "lighter and thinner at the expense of everything else". Sadly Apple is catering to people like you above all these days... and we're all living with the results.
 
I'm going to drop Apple/Mac OS when my machines kick the bucket - but that's the key phrase 'kick the bucket' - as in break/fail/irreparably damage etc. I'd have no problems using either my Air or iMac after they were obsoleted (the Air is coming up, the iMac has a while), but have no experience doing so (would only drop these if some critical security issue came up and Apple wouldn't/couldn't patch em)
 
I don't get this argument, all I've heard about Windows tablets is that it is disadvantageous to have one OS for both mobile and desktops.

Mobile = battery, user touch & voice interface
Desktop = plug-in(/large battery), user keyboard, trackpad, mouse

They are just two entirely different platforms. There is no way they will merge iOS & macOS, they keep saying it, not sure why people don't believe it. The people that use Macs for video editing, science or music creation are not with you on this.
Microsoft screwed the pooch when they first tried to have one OS for their phones, tablets, and traditional computers. First, with Windows 8, they just threw the UI out there. It was a very nice UI for mobile and portable, but YouTube was plastered with those "watch seniors try to use Windows 8" videos, because it was not intuitive if you were not using a touch device.

I may have issues with Apple's direction with their traditional computers (laptops and desktops), but their grasp of UI for every platform (watch, TV, phone, tablet, laptop/desktop) is second to none. And Apple already pushes a similar look and feel between the apps for video editing, music creation, audio, etc., between touch and non-touch devices.
 
Oh, you're a charmer. :p

And I also drive a 2004 Honda Accord, in case you're interested. I suppose that makes me an old fogie (though I grew up in the 90's) but sexy as modern tech might be, it taketh away as much as it giveth, and I don't like a computer without versatile I/O components any more than I like a car that thinks for me. I'll do my own thinking, thankyouverymuch. ;)
Versatile like USB-C ports that support literally every I/O imaginable including power and use the same connector for all of them? Your way sounds pretty inconvenient unless your gripe is that you don't want to buy a few cables on Amazon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
This is ridiculous. What is their standard on which models to drop and which models to keep? 10.6 dropped support for PPC machines, 10.7 dropped support for 32-bit computers, 10.8 dropped support for processors with a 32-bit EFI (even though it didn't need to), but with 10.12 they just dropped support for a random set of computers. That already pissed me off since right before then I upgraded my MacBook to a 2009 model but just two years later this happens again? Seriously?

While I understand that computers, including Macs, naturally become outdated as technology improves, in recent years there have been little technological progress (at least for PCs) that could justify the drop for OS support. A 2009 computer is only marginally less advanced than a 2012 computer, compared to, let's say a 2005 computer which looks outdated in comparison to said 2009 computer. Naturally, this means that software support should be longer, and considering how Mac hardware has been getting worse and worse as time goes on, I have less and less motivation to even consider getting a Mac nowadays.
 
Well, damn. I was hoping to use my 2010-era music server for Airplay 2. Maybe I won't buy that second HomePod after all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IG88
What you fail to notice from just reading the specs is that, for example, AMD never released a official Windows 10 driver for their pre-GCN graphics. This means that they were obsoleted in 2015. This is the exact same situation as Apple: a Sandy Bridge iMac can't run Windows 10, something that happened 3 years earlier.

Windows support is contingent on hardware vendor support, which often bails earlier than Apple does.
That's a shame. My Sandy Bridge i7-2600K PC runs Win 10 amazingly well.
 
Ah well... My 2011 MBP is officially old now and this makes me reconsider buying a Windows machine to replace it instead of a new Mac... If that's not planned obsolescence I don't know what it is. Longevity is one of the big advantages of owning a Mac but sadly it seems that they'd rather have a dark mode and a bunch of users forced to upgrade -> $$$.

Dude is a 2011 machine. Did you think it was going to be updated forever?
I also have a 2011 MacBook Pro but I have no means to switch to a inferior software (windows) because of a update. My mac runs buttery smooth
 
It would be even better, if they would offer a GPU-replacement for these. It's i7 CPU benchmarks are still nothing to complain about. However, in two years time it will be a worthless paperweight because it will be unsafe to use for anything practical...

The best use for a 2011 iMac is now either Windows or Linux.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IG88
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.