macOS 10.14 Mojave Drops Support for Many Older Machines

It's too bad that my mid-2010 iMac—which still runs as well as the day I got it—will not be able to run Mojave. Fair, though; the thing is nearly eight years old.

For those whose devices will not run Mojave: do not fret; this is not the "end of the road" for your computers! Indeed, so long as Apple continues to support High Sierra (likely for two more years) your device ought not to be considered obsolete.

EDIT: and yes, while my iMac was indeed ~$2,500 back in 2010, the reality is that I have had no problems with it in eight years. Absolutely none. That to me is worth the Apple price premium. I'll gladly buy another iMac a couple years down the line.
I have an 8yr old HP with beats audio that runs Windows 10 like a dream. She'll go til she dies or slows down neither of which has happened yet for only $800
 
Dude is a 2011 machine. Did you think it was going to be updated forever?
I also have a 2011 MacBook Pro but I have no means to switch to a inferior software (windows) because of a update. My mac runs buttery smooth
I knew it wouldn't be supported forever but I can't understand why the sudden jump from supporting 2009 and later machines to supporting 2012 and later. I'll have to try Mojave but from the announcements it doesn't look like a game changer. Hopefully by dropping the older Macs they were able to offer a better experience on the new ones.
 
OH, so you're the one person who loves "lighter and thinner at the expense of everything else". Sadly Apple is catering to people like you above all these days... and we're all living with the results.

Ya I guess. I’ve bought three of the retina MacBook, and quite like them. Dongles are NBD for the 25 minutes a month I might need them.
 
I've been holding out on upgrading my Mid-2011 MBPro because nothing of late from Apple could offer what I wanted - a laptop with a user replaceable parts, standard USB-A slots, a more powerful unit and an integrated DVD/Bluray burner. Call me old-fashioned but thats what I want. Yes my current MBPro may be showing its age without a faster GPU but so what, it still works. Also why the heck do I want USB-C when most of my daily use devices are all USB-A?. Apple actually has a lot to learn from Razer. Even though their previous Blade laptop had soldered in RAM, some of their newer models now have been changed that allows for user replaceable RAM. They should do the same for the current MBPro. Either that or I go the Hackintosh route, which would offer me far better options in both power and upgrade flexibility.
 
Me, I want that dark mode for finder, Safari and iTunes.

Buy a new Mac then. One shouldn't expect their machine to receive updates forever. You're using pretty ancient hardware if your machine isn't compatible.

A 2009-2010 Mac Pro can run rings around some trash-can Mac Pro's after they are updated with new CPU's RAM and a PCI-e SSD.

You're saying that dark mode requires a much more powerful computer? What else is in Mojave that would necessitate a much more powerful system (keeping in mind Apple is chopping pretty much by DATE and not by PERFORMANCE of a given machine)? Apple will allow Mojave on a 2012 Macbook Air, but not a 2009 Mac Pro with a 6-core XEON, 32GB RAM, SSD, and a beefy graphics card that is Metal compatible?
 
Last edited:
A 2009-2010 Mac Pro can run rings around some trash-can Mac Pro's after they are updated with new CPU's RAM and a PCI-e SSD.

You're saying that dark mode requires a much more powerful computer? What else is in Mojave that would necessitate a much more powerful system (keeping in mind Apple is chopping pretty much by DATE and not by PERFORMANCE of a given machine)? Apple will allow Mojave on a 2012 Macbook Air, but not a 2010 Mac Pro with a 6-core XEON, 32GB RAM, SSD, and a beefy graphics card that is Metal compatible?
From the OP:
Mac Pro (Late 2013, plus mid 2010 and mid 2012 models with recommended Metal-capable GPU)
The Mac Pro 5,1 will be supported provided you have a Metal-capable GPU.
 
I don't expect they're dropping support for performance reasons, more likely they don't want to continue updating and maintaining drivers for the old hardware, continuing the support and testing costs, etc, and at some point, they do want to push people along to new hardware. 7-8 years of longevity is a tremendous life for any modern electronic device, a significant amount of value was obviously created and it isn't unreasonable for it to go out of update support at some point.
 
In the past Apple dropped support for older machines due to a small hardware limitation, usually related to the cpu and supported instruction sets. Does anyone know what the limitation is this time?
The GPU, and whether or not it supports Metal.
[doublepost=1528156740][/doublepost]
I wonder if a 4.1 that has been flashed to a 5,1 will be supported? I'll still be happy then. :)
Too early to tell. Just wait a few days and someone will have tried.
 
Guess I'll probably be making a decision in the next couple of years to either get a new MacBook Pro or switch to Windows like I did with my desktop after my iMac lost its support.

It's kinda sad that they drop support despite the abandoned systems still being more than capable of running their newer versions of the operating system. Even Windows 10 can run fairly fast and without any problems using a Core 2 Duo CPU with 4 gigs of RAM and a SSD.
 
YouTube was plastered with those "watch seniors try to use Windows 8" videos, because it was not intuitive if you were not using a touch device.

Ugh, I help an elderly aunt with her computing needs and she has a touchscreen Windows 8 laptop. She uses it like a tablet and she's fine with anything you can touch on the screen, but once she has to use the mouse, it's "game over, thank you for playing, but the price of admission has just been doubled and you can pay on your way out the door".

Watching her get tied up in knots convinced me that mobile OSes and desktop OSes need to stay separate.
 
If you keep throwing logic out the window like this, you're going to break it. :rolleyes:

Fair enough. So let's use real numbers: "One of the best and last great machines Apple ever made" is literally 250% the weight of my 2017 retina MacBook. And yes, I did (briefly) own the 2011 MBP. Sucker was heavy.
 
Already had the wife's 2011 iMac in process to go to eBay, but this ensures quick action on it. ;)

I have no interest in 10.14 even though my Mac Pro 5,1 can support it.

That's a bit of the bummer, I'm totally juiced for .14 (one of the few times in years that I'm actually looking forward to the release simply because I'll use on a daily basis so much of what was talked about).
 
One of the best and last great machines Apple ever made. Upgradeable, ports, magsafe.. what's not to love?

The screen....other than that, it’s the perfect machine haha

(It’s my personal main home computer, I love it...but that screen can be a bit of an eyesore)
[doublepost=1528158588][/doublepost]
Keep in mind security updates for High Sierra should continue for another 24 months...

Another 48 actually, Apple supports the last two versions with security patches
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top