I have this screen. Bought this model in France, after returning one of the same models with a screen that was brighter, but washed out and the text looked too light against white background. Also the field of vision, both horizontal and vertical were a bit limited. Much happier with this screen. The vertical and horizontal views are much better, the colors seem saturated and the text crisp.
Compared it last night with a friend's Macbook Pro 15"--a late october 2008 model. The 15" color was a bit more muted, but overall comparison was quite good. I realize these new models have an increased color gamut, which might make the colors seem more punchy, but my photos look great and am quite satisfied with the screen. No dead pixels, as opposed to the model that I returned. Unfortunately, I forgot the model number of the screen that I returned.
I have a 9C9E with the same "blue" problem. The issue still exists when I boot into Vista via Boot Camp.
I have this lcd too but i dont notice much difference.should i be concerned and get it replaced?
will it in the future get worse or is it just being picky for colors?I dont have any other macbooks to compare too so not sure.
also, if i do get ir replaced how do i know that the new one will have the new screen 9c9f? is there a way to check on the serial or model number of the box?
I have a 9C9E with the same "blue" problem. The issue still exists when I boot into Vista via Boot Camp.
My 9C9E screen is yellowish and it looks pretty undersaturated. Also, when I scroll, blue links become purple.
Will try to see if I can get a replacement by taking it into a different Apple Store (I don't want to get the same model if I go into the same Apple store because they order in batches of 50 or 100). Any tips on how I should talk to the Genius Bar person?
How do I check the model # and how do I calibrate the screen?
I was looking around the System Profiler but I didn't find anything.
What does everyone use to calibrate their screen? I'm a MBP newb.
Does the OS have something built into it?
Recieved a 9CBD today, and I still have the 9C9E for some comparisons.
In fact, both screens look the same. The default calibration is a little different (9CBD look greater, but there's no much difference)
Anyway, after calibrating those babies with a Spyder2Express, there is no more difference at all! Same viewing angles, etc.
So, in my opinion, the differences betweens the different manufacturers are negligibles: no reasons to get mad about that...
Here are some screenshots (I've done that the best way I can): Leica D-LUX4, ISO100, RAW, fixed exposition, fixed with balance, and unrawed on Lightroom. Let my know what you think!
2 manufacturers, but there's finally no much differences :
![]()
Viewing angles looks identicals :
On the left, 9C9E and on the right 9CBD :
![]()
Horizontal viewing angles looks the same, too...
![]()
Finally, a little video of the MacBooks Pro, to show that the screens looks the same:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EKbKseuteE
Can your post the calibration profiles for both of the screens? Also, was the brightness of both displays at max?
I feel my 9CBD screen is relatively dim (especially next to my iPhone)....do you experience this?
Thanks