Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In what way will it have it beat? I'm not hating on your comment but I'd like you to explain your reasons. If your talking about betting specs then ok, but the iPhone only needs about half (guess) the processing power to run it's OS then Android does. So processing power and a lot of other features are relative to the OS. If you have a new Core i7 desktop and its loaded with tons of crap on it, it will probably still run slower then my Core 2 Duo.

If it has an 8mp camera instead of a 5mp? Cool. I guess with the iPhone I can't print out my pictures to be the size of a full wall, darn. The quality of the lens is what is important to me. I still have an old Nikon 2mp camera. Yeah, I can't do great photo editing with it but it still takes great normal size pictures that a cheap 10mp camera couldn't do.

I don't think there will ever be a clear cut winner. In terms of sales, the iPhone will most definitely run laps around the Evo. In terms of specs on paper, the Evo will run laps around the iPhone. As far as how the phone performs and how much people like it is on an individual basis. This thread and this argument could go on forever. It's like arguing why you prefer apples over oranges and I prefer oranges over apples.

Best post in thread.
 
Best post in thread.

Nearly. Except the suggestion that Android just has "a bunch of crap on it" that makes it un-smooth. Although the total simplicity of the iPhone is what does make it a very clean OS, so I can let it slide. ;)

Good post though, basically sums up everything that has been said, but it's not going to stop people from bickering, haha.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble. The most significant OS 4.0 update is the faux multi-tasking. Android has true multi-tasking since day 1. Oh, and iPhone just got the capability to set your own wallpaper. How awesome is that? :rolleyes:

Is that "true" multitasking the reason that the number one download from Android Market is a Task Manager just so people can quit processes once their phone grinds to a halt? Yeah, that's pretty awesome. :rolleyes:
 
Is that "true" multitasking the reason that the number one download from Android Market is a Task Manager just so people can quit processes once their phone grinds to a halt? Yeah, that's pretty awesome. :rolleyes:

Is it true that for a while the number one app in the App Store was iFart?

So what?

Nobody I know with Android has any Task Manager app.
 
Nobody I know with Android has any Task Manager app.

same. demo phones in stores dont use them to clear apps, and they seem to run just fine even with all the crap open that people have been playing with in store. the new androids do not need a task manager, in fact some argue that they run better without it rather than terminating everything in this way.

anyway, the iphone used to have task managers, but apple pulled them, and thats the only reason we dont all have them now. we wouldnt need them, but we'd have them... just like android.
 
Is that "true" multitasking the reason that the number one download from Android Market is a Task Manager just so people can quit processes once their phone grinds to a halt? Yeah, that's pretty awesome. :rolleyes:

You probably never used a N1 before. My phone can run 10+ applications at the same time without grinding to a halt. You have no idea what a big difference 512MB RAM makes. I consistently have over 150MB of free RAM available without killing active apps.
 
It lost to the Nexus One earlier this year and now again to the Droid Incredible on Cnet's Prizefight. Apple better step up their game or else .......RIP

http://reviews.cnet.com/2722-6452_7-559.html?tag=smallCarouselArea.0

Sore losers :rolleyes:

How do you know and what factual evidence do you have to back up that claim? By past practice, Apple's crippling of the iPhone and anti-open source policy would lead anyone to believe that it will fall short in many areas.

You lost all credibility once i read these. You're biased.

Have fun celebrating the fact that a 10 month old device 'lost' to a device released within the past week...solely due to the carrier its on.
 
Do you know what an OS is?

By your logic the iPhone OS is no good as it's just a 3rd party overlaying interface doing what Darwin failed to do...

You can't be serious with this argument.

Says a lot. No wonder you're a spec whore. This stretch isn't something I'd expect. Why not just argue that they are all building on Pingala's system? :rolleyes:

The Nexus One and Android has nothing going for it right now.

That's not true. It's an alternative. It has that going for it. If I didn't want/have an iPhone, I'd look at an Android device.

Why do you have to jailbreak your iPhone to if the stock iPhone is so polished?

For added functionality, the same reason you and many other Android OS users gain root access and install custom ROM's.
 
Nearly. Except the suggestion that Android just has "a bunch of crap on it" that makes it un-smooth. Although the total simplicity of the iPhone is what does make it a very clean OS, so I can let it slide. ;)

Good post though, basically sums up everything that has been said, but it's not going to stop people from bickering, haha.


Haha I knew it wouldn't stop the bickering but I was hoping people that are either die hard Apple or die hard Android would take a step back and see the positives of both. I wasn't trying to say that Android had a bunch of crap on it. I was trying to say that it was more complex and open to apps that can access the systems code which can over time slow the system down if people don't know what they are doing. Apple is a lot more restrictive which everyone knows. Most people place this as a negative to Apple and I agree somewhat with that, but the fact that they do this is what keeps iPhone's running smooth and bug free.
 
PAID $599 for a ****** iPhone, and the manufacture who HYPES their **** cannot even BUILD it CORRECTLY. It these fanboys who defend Apple's STUPID decisions that are retarded.

Oh, and Gizmodo. They didn't do the right thing by purchasing misplaced property, but it was Apple's fault because THEY trusted a DRUNK 27 year old with a prototype iPhone. But those fanboys says its all gizmodo's fault and it was a tiny mistake made by Apple. Losing a prototype iPhone costing a company money isn't a tiny mistake.

wasn't this a discussion about the Incredible and 3GS?

Hold your horses, first of all, you can't expect any phone to look as it does from day one and i think Apple's Phones are one of the best ones on the long term look

Also, how can it be apple's fault? So many computing companies have 20 year old employees with huge salaries and stuff, but you're basically saying, "It's the government's fault that a person is able to kill another person, punish the government"
And btw, people get drunk, even steve jobs
 
You can't be serious with this argument.

Says a lot. No wonder you're a spec whore. This stretch isn't something I'd expect. Why not just argue that they are all building on Pingala's system? :rolleyes:

Well that's rude. I wasn't arguing that anyone was building on anything. I was pointing out that arguing as such (like Sense UI being bad because it's "on top of" Android) is pointless. It seems like you got that point just fine.

My point is that it integrates into the low-level of the OS. It's not just a skin that loads up on top of the Android UI. It's actually an alternative. Much like using Ubuntu Linux and running either KDE or Gnome. It's not a downside.

It's a UI over an OS. iPhone OS is the same. It's a UI over an OS. It was a stretch to say Darwin, but you get the point.

Also, what does this have to do with specs at all? Totally irrelevant. Great deductive skills you have. Way to resort to childish flames.
 
You go ahead and keep assuming that Android will be the market leader in 2011. I believe there are 40+ million iPhone users at this point. Don't forget that you can't truly multi-task on a Verizon Android while on a call. Multi-tasking really isn't that important. Never was. It was only another bitchfest for haters and non-iPhone users in attempt to make themselves feel better for their choice of phone. I have had customizable wallpapers and multitasking for about three years now as I am jailbroken. Your argument holds no water with me.

Not being able to background Pandora or Spotify or any other radio app is and always has been assine. And detracts from my iPhone experience (were I not jailbroken) a whole lot more than not being able to talk and surf (which you can do over wifi anyway on CDMA) would.

You shouldn't have to jailbreak to do that nor should you have to jailbreak to have a freaking wallpaper. Thank goodness Apple came to their senses there.
 
I know the MacBook Air uses Intel Core 2 Duo. My point is Apple and Intel had worked together to make that SPECIFIC core 2 duo JUSt for Apple's MacBook Air. Why didn't the world's most innovative company work with Intel on designing a custom i5 and i7 for these so called "Pro" machines?

Because the MacBook Air is all about the thinness and battery life, they need to make something special, same reason why the iPad doesn't have an intel Atom or whatever, the MacBook Pro has enough space for a normal CPU and enough space for a better battery


Stop Hijacking the thread
 
Front facing cam and ichat that is hopefully coming to the new iPhone will beat the hell out of all Androids. Of course as soon as Apple will introduce video chat, Android copycats will bring that too. One obvious reason how Android army can defeat iPhone is a quantity of the devices that soon translates to quality. Apple has only one handset, while slew of Android phone makers can do a lot of hit and miss phones to get one right.

You can tell however, that iPhone is and will remain standard everybody else is compared too - that is impressive in itself!
 
Front facing cam and ichat that is hopefully coming to the new iPhone will beat the hell out of all Androids. Of course as soon as Apple will introduce video chat, Android copycats will bring that too.

HTC EVO was announced in March 2010 that the phone would come with a front-facing camera. How's that a copycat?
:confused:
 
I'm convinced people who start trolling threads like this one are either teenagers who made a choice, are insecure about their choice, but don't have the means to do anything about it -- e.g. they couldn't afford to make a change even if they wanted to so they have to prove to everyone else that they made the best investment . . . Or type of person who starts arguments like this is a socially-awkward knucklehead. Either way, I pity the fool. Pity my grammar and poor sentence structure, as well.:cool:
 
Front facing cam and ichat that is hopefully coming to the new iPhone will beat the hell out of all Androids. Of course as soon as Apple will introduce video chat, Android copycats will bring that too.

Hahaha. Yea, other poster already said this... but the EVO was announced first and it's got it. Also, I hear Europe has had that feature on many phones for a long while...

You can tell however, that iPhone is and will remain standard everybody else is compared too - that is impressive in itself!

This is definitely true. The iPhone, and specifically the 3G, really did revolutionize the smartphone market. I think it will be quite some time before another phone will have the mindshare that the iPhone does.
 
Exactly.
Yet they all love their droids, htc, N1 etc
But they are all here posting and browsing on the iPhone forum:rolleyes:
Obviously they all have second thoughts and feel the need to defend their purchase for whatever reason like anyone here cares.

Ironically... They do care... Post 150 here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.