Nope, many other posts have said the same thingI can't be the only one thinking, 'if only it didn't run on Windows...'
Still runs windows... xD
There is a fatal flaw to these products. They still only run Windows. Blech
Amazing how similar computers look nowadays to Apple products invented (and still sold) 5 years ago.
For price comparison, Wacom Cintiq 27 QHD Touch costs $2799.99 and that's just the display.
I'm sure we'll end up with stuff that's comparable in performance and price, though maybe not in the same battery range as the SurfaceBook. But I just reeeeeeeally hope they don't neglect the desktop line, because that Studio is just Microsoft's industrial design team flipping Apple the bird, and I'm over here wondering if I can get macOS running on it.I know that the Surface book has had its fair share of issues, but I have to admit that I like it quite a bit, especially the battery life.
Luckily, Apple should have something good tomorrow, too.
I can't be the only one who wants to see Wacom struggle. Their prices and the rate of improvements to their professional product line really show how little competition they've had over the past decade.Yep... it will be interesting to see how Apple responds to this (they responded to Surface w/ the iPad Pro), but it will be TRULY interesting to see if Wacom starts slowly dying.
According to Macrumours, this is utter ****.. Skylake in late 2016? Hahahahaha
I think its less about innovation but the direction that Apple positioned OS X. I think integrating iOS/OS X interactions and bringing them closer together is Apple's intent (read shared clip board), where as MS is adding some kick-ass featuresA lot of people feel that was about MacOS, especially after the last 2-3 years of Apple software "innovation", which has been nonexistent.
How about we wait until tomorrow before we start comparing this to Apple's current offerings? Is it that hard to wait one day?