Of course not. The target of this are for contracts from firms or solution providers (eg. designer house, etc). No average consumer would be willing to spend $3000 on a desktop, Mac or otherwise.Seems like people should be complaining about Microsoft prices on memory, or is that reserved for Apple only? I like what MS is doing, but the studio clearly isn't priced for the average consumer.
You're kidding right? Not even close to an iMac clone. I've been a Mac user since day one and always will be but I'll admit this is one awesome machine. $3,000 is a bargain! Compare this to the Wacom 27QHD which is ONLY a monitor that costs $2,800. For $200 bucks more you're getting a full on computer, (plus an extra inch of screen). If you buy the Wacom display you have to pay at least another $500 for a computer.. Also this isn't your everyday desktop. It's marketed towards professionals. I just hope Apple is paying attention to this and comes out with something very similar.These are amazing, but the pricing is outrageous. The iMac clone starts at 2,999!!!!!
LOL what? So pushing the mobile SoC to its limit is not innovation because you don't like how iOS look?Since when is Apple about raw hardware power? Apple was always about the experience not numbers. iOS experience in larger screen formats is outdated and limited, Apple is completely visionless there.
Really? Having one of the most efficient and powerful mobile SoC is "sitting on its laurels"?
Apple is focused on its vision. Steve Jobs always said that Apple is making computers for the mere mortals. Right now, that means mobile, and Apple bet on mobile.
Both companies are innovating, just on different things.
Asus basically creates its own version of iPad Pro, Surface Pro, Macbook, Watch, and iMac. Now they will created the Asus version o Surface Studio.Er... what?
Yep, pretty much what I just said, just a little more elaborate. I would have to see some footage of how these perform, but I could see myself considering switching to something like this. Going to wait and see what apple shows tomorrow, though my hopes are low.Of course not. The target of this are for contracts from firms or solution providers (eg. designer house, etc). No average consumer would be willing to spend $3000 on a desktop, Mac or otherwise.
Seems like people should be complaining about Microsoft prices on memory, or is that reserved for Apple only? I like what MS is doing, but the studio clearly isn't priced for the average consumer.
LOL what? So pushing the mobile SoC to its limit is not innovation because you don't like how iOS look?
Pick any of the gorgeous PC hardware out there, for mac users all the hardware beauty and power in the world isn't appealing because it runs Windows not OSX. Software/platform severely important. Similarly, all the beautiful power of an iPad Pro is useless to many because iOS is just visionless there and Apple continues to restrict and limit its potential.
It's not priced for the average consumer is what I said.It wasn't and wasn't intended to be. Just like the Mac Pro, it is catering to a niche market.
Sorry, sleep deprived. My bad.It's not priced for the average consumer is what I said.
These look appealing but my foray into Microsoft products began and ended this year with the Microsoft band. When it comes to supporting their products, Apple takes the cake in comparison. I will be buying new MacBook Pro.
This does not correspond with my experience with windows 8.x or 10. Preferences or settings always appeared on one of two places, control panel or settings. I am just skeptical you have used the os. Its not complicated and is extremely easy to navigate in desktop or tablet mode. It needs more optimization for sleep/wake and power issuesWindows, however, has lost its way. A mish-mash of confused UI elements, paradigms and multiple preferences scattered across completely different control panels all driven by trying to jam an OS explicitly designed for 20+ for use by mouse and keyboard into a touch device.
Clearly you don't remember the 2001 iMac.Holo ****. This technology has nothing to do with holography.
And that's about the stupidest, ugliest base for a computer I've ever seen.
If you use Windows for work 8 hours a day and not just as a glorified game launcher (aka Wintendo) then perhaps you'd feel different. Windows is as always, a death by a thousand pinpricks and coming back to my 5K iMac every day is like taking a breath of fresh air for the very first time.I wonder about how many of the "but it runs Window" folks have been on Windows in the past several years.
While I love MacOS, I am an avid gamer and use both Boot Camp and a dedicated PC regularly.
Apple are really sleeping at the wheel - despite it being a nod of the original 'Pixar' imac and more modern imacs - why the hell didn't apple think of something like this.
I think Gabe has been inconsistant in some of his assessments, but what struck me in his remarks was how awestruck he was working on the Studio. This gives me hope that the stand is really good.Here is what Penny Arcade's Gabe had to say:
"Tycho asked me to compare it to my Cintiq, and I told him that drawing on the Cintiq now felt like drawing on a piece of dirty plexiglass hovering over a CRT monitor from 1997."