You're a lawyer? I thought lawyers were highly educated people, who could use a spelling checker and write grammatically correct sentences, and could put forward a logical argument. You fail in each category. Look, if you start your post with "I am a lawyer for a V10 firm", appealing to the authority that this is supposed to give to your opinion, then you can expect us to shred this authority apart. If you had started saying "I am twelve years old and my dad says PCs rock", your post would have been forgivable, but not for someone who claims he is a lawyer.
Nobody has ever admitted that Apple cannot compete with the prices of other PC manufacturers. Fact is that Apple deliberately chooses not to compete on price. When a top manager at Apple says "we don't know how to build a laptop for under $500 that isn't crap" then we all add what he hasn't said: "... and neither does anyone else, but that doesn't stop them from selling laptops for under $500, and believe me, they are crap". Do you really think Apple builds the cases for its laptops from a single block of aluminium because they haven't figured out Dell's secret manufacturing process for cheap plastic cases?
And what is that nonsense "the only reason you buy a Macintosh is for looks/OS"? People make educated buying decisions. When they buy a computer, they weigh up multiple factors: Product quality, reliability, quality of service, reputation of the manufacturer, upgradability, green qualities, design, usability of the software, all added together and measured against price. Macs beat PCs selling at the same price in most of these measures, even though Apple sells Macs at a healthy profit, which most PC manufacturers don't. The whole package is better.
Then you make the claim "you can buy a cheaper PC [sic] than has better hardware than a [sic] MAC". You can buy a cheaper PC. You can buy a cheaper PC with a processor running at a higher clock speed. But that is not enough to make it "better hardware". "Better hardware" has to take most of the criteria into account that I mentioned, in fact all except "quality of service", "reputation of the manufacturer", and "usability of software". Product quality, reliability, upgradability, green qualities, and design are all things that count when you compare hardware. Once you stop pretending to be blind to the realities of life, you find that finding better PC hardware for less money than a Mac is really, really difficult. And it would have to be a lot cheaper, because if you don't take service quality and software quality in account, you are a fool.
Damn why can't most users on this forum reason like this.