Didn't this crowd rip CR for being biased, on the dole, etc when they gave a less-than-great review of a MB Pro not long ago? Why is CR only right when they find fault with competitor offerings? (disclaimer: I'm a big fan of trusting CR reviews & ratings myself)
Similarly, why are analysts stupid only when they are not gushing praise and/or ranking Apple #1 in some report?
Why do specs not matter when Apple stuff does not have the best specs... but when Apple does win some spec contest, then they do matter at that time?
Why are market share reports biased or just wrong when Apple is not rated #1 but then quoted & referenced when Apple is #1?
And why is patent law broken when it's working AGAINST Apple but key to protecting intellectual capital when it's working FOR Apple?
Somehow & some way, I think all this goes together. Can anyone connect the dots?