Microsoft Says New Surface Pro is Faster Than 15" M3 MacBook Air

Apple surely doesn’t look competitive anymore and are losing market share on all fronts. Almost every brand has copied Apple’s famous vertical integration by now. The thing that used to set Apple apart from the competition. Some better than others. I hope wwdc will bring some big changes soon. Otherwise I think Apple will become the next Nokia although in a slower space. Name one Apple product that sits apart head and shoulders above the competition. I can’t think of one, you?

Absolutely nothing Apple makes anymore is class-leading, and that is objectively true and sad.
 
The new Microsoft laptops sound great, but when will we see a wide selection of Windows software that takes full advantage of the Snapdragon X Elite SoC's hardware registers?
Sooner than you think I guess. Either way much sooner than Apple finally gives the iPad an os it deserves.

I think Timmy has been more busy counting money than pouring money into R&D to make their products future proof again.

Apple maybe rich but I’ve never seen a company as big and rich as Apple coming with such incredimental upgrades, or nothing at all, year after year. Their market share loss on all fronts should have happened years ago.
 
Last edited:
This MS event literally just announced a bunch of developers making their applications ARM native. Google, Adobe, and others. But they also claim their emulator is now as good as Rosetta.
I'd say that remains to be seen. MS has been trying to get more and more developers to jettison their older codebases so that developing for ARM would be easier, but as you can imagine, it's been a case of herding cats. This is one area where Apple's tight control over its hardware has always proven to be incredibly effective - Apple has basically completed four major platform transitions without too many hiccups (68x >> PPC >> OSX >> Intel >> ARM) because they have been able to get developers to adopt new coding standards far in advance.
 
Ipados is as outdated as Symbian now. Windows on arm will crush it just like in the ipad ad. IPadOs is now a horrible, limited, old, inefficient piece of software which requires multiple steps for easiest operations such as attaching a file to mail, and which barely enables users to perform most rudimentary operations and fails to deliver most basic features such keeping a file on a desktop. Oops it doesnt even have a desktop
 
Last edited:
And yet, the iPad is still basically the only competitive tablet on the market, today, with the Surface line maybe giving it a little bit of a run (but really, the Surface line serves a fundamentally different market).
Not when all the creative suite adobe apps will run circles around the crippled iPad os. Apple has been neglecting iPad os for too long. The sales figures prove it.
 
Not when all the creative suite adobe apps will run circles around the crippled iPad os. Apple has been neglecting iPad os for too long. The sales figures prove it.
I hope you're right - but right now we're talking about vapourware. Perhaps in a year from now we'll be able to judge for sure.
 
If someone switches to Linux - why still bother with x86 apps... I am really looking forward to notebooks with Arm CPU and Linux. If Lenovo brings a Thinkpad like that on the market, i'm in.
Are you running all web based apps? Going to just run Android or Chrome OS? If not, then app compatibility is still a major issue. Even though you can often build the apps yourself from source in Linux, most were built for x86 and x64 and are not guaranteed to run on a different instruction set. And there's no emulator like Rosetta or Prism to make them work.
 
It is important to remember the typical Windows users the thought of $1000 or more on a computer is not even in the realm of possibilities. Some of that is due to assuming the $1000 machine offers no better experience than the $500 machine.

Of course the fastest PC I have ever used is Windows ARM on Parallels. Windows 11 is no MacOS, but it is good and by far their best effort. The ARM version is probably better because they must of dropped a lot of legacy components to make it work.
 
It is important to remember the typical Windows users the thought of $1000 or more on a computer is not even in the realm of possibilities. Some of that is due to assuming the $1000 machine offers no better experience than the $500 machine.

Of course the fastest PC I have ever used is Windows ARM on Parallels. Windows 11 is no MacOS, but it is good and by far their best effort. The ARM version is probably better because they must of dropped a lot of legacy components to make it work.
People also forget the announcement of improved Prism emulation is great news for Parallels/VM Mac users who run Windows, as the emulation will run much better. Would be interesting to compare performance of x86 apps in Parallels (using Prism to emulate) vs. Crossover (using Rosetta to emulate).
 
People also forget the announcement of improved Prism emulation is great news for Parallels/VM Mac users who run Windows, as the emulation will run much better. Would be interesting to compare performance of x86 apps in Parallels (using Prism to emulate) vs. Crossover (using Rosetta to emulate).
I can't wait to see the reviews. We will know soon enough. This time next year we should know if it lived up to the hype,
 
The biggest takeaway of the new Surface for me is they are pitching this against the Macbook Air which is a more expensive computer, but base memory in all these new machines Microsoft launched is 16GB. Apple is going to have to move up to 16GB RAM in Air to win the comparison test in the box stores. They have no choice now.
Actually they are pitching this against the Macbook Air which is Apple's lowest end laptop computer - - released more than a year ago. Good for the Surface line to get stronger, but it is not at all a reflection on the power of Apple laptops.

And (IMO) the constant whining about base RAM gets old. Folks who need more RAM should just buy more RAM. The point about box store comparisons is interesting, however. Do you suppose many people do that, ignore Win OS versus Mac OS and instead compare based on base RAM at the box stores?
 
Last edited:
First off, I know this article is about iPad versus a Surface laptop, but I am seriously thinking about the Surface laptop because of the following experiences. Curious if anyone else had graduated to the "Dark Side"?

Having used Macs solely since 2006, about 17 years, I decided to build a gaming PC. Full blown setup with an i9-14900K, RTX 4090 graphics card, 64gb RAM, liquid cooling, and Windows 11 Home...yada yada yada.

The PC was built for $3700 and the Mac Studio Ultra I bought at $4000. Pretty comparative pricing between the 2 and in my sweet spot financially for a desktop. And yes, if I would just shop for the same PC from a company online, delivered it would cost probably around $4600-$4700.

I built it mainly for VR gaming and wanted to see how it compared to my Mac Studio Ultra M2 in apps like LightRoom, Adobe Premier Pro 2024, and Photoshop.

At this point I don't even turn the Mac on anymore and am thinking of selling it. The PC has far exceeded what I thought it would do with all aspects of my computer use, gaming and productivity. I'll stay in the Apple ecosystem with an iPad Pro and an iPhone.

NEVER thought I would touch a Windows PC in my home again but my mind has changed after 17 years which before that I was building gaming PC's.

So yes, the performance gap between Windows and Mac has always been a he said/she said kind of relationship depending on what exactly you were comparing between the two. Trying two head-to-head 2 different architectures is a little tricky.

But I have to tell you in the end, my PC "just works".
If your focus is gaming then you have been starving yourself using a Mac which are not gaming rigs. One thing to note is there is virtually no resale market for self-built gaming PC's or for that matter any PC. $1000 new PC would be lucky to get $200 in 5 years. The Mac Studio will have significant resale value 5 years from now. I am not criticizing, but it is worth noting when comparing the two.

I have used and sold/traded in a lot of Macs for my company and friends/family. I sold a 2011 MacBook Air for $250 (original cost $1299) and traded in my 2018 MBP in January for $700 (original cost: $3000). Those are ridiculous residual values that PC's could only dream of. Same for iPhones and iPads.

Of course your goal is gaming and you made the right choice for you.
 
Just prior to the release of this new surface, I had just completed configuring the surface Pro 10 for business. It’s a bit more robust than this new incarnation, but I think next year will be more refined AI integration. 👨‍💼👆
 
Last edited:
I have used and sold/traded in a lot of Macs for my company and friends/family. I sold a 2011 MacBook Air for $250 (original cost $1299) and traded in my 2018 MBP in January for $700 (original cost: $3000). Those are ridiculous residual values that PC's could only dream of. Same for iPhones and iPads.
The workstation I'm using right now cost me under $2000 (CAD) to build a year ago. A similar Mac Studio would have cost me over $3500. Personally, I'd rather have that extra $1500 now instead of five years from now when I finally decide to upgrade again.
 
If this turns out to be true, it is time for Apple to stop sleeping on the couch and compete.

Apple Silicon's heyday is over, Apple needs to start innovating again instead of doing minor spec bumps.

Yes, I will still buy a Mac and many others will too because of the software, but for those who need hardware, it might be a good buy for them.
Unfortunately apple hasn't REALLY been competing on the top end, just performance per watt. The GPU side apple has seeded to Nvidia and even Radeon. TBH I almost wish apple would build a gaming console that's focused on not just graphics but advanced AI to play against/with and just use that to catapult their GPU/Compute chips. That's a big area apple is behind in. Then again most of those more powerful cpus are for severe and I'm glad apple is focused on users/small studios.
 
Funny because Jobs and Wozniak stole their original Mac ideas and the concept of a mouse from Xerox...
Odd. I have been using the Samsung Book S fanless laptop with an arm processor released in 2019. It even has LTE built-in that I am sure Remond will copy again.
 
You got MY attention Microsoft! Can you load up the demo project for Final Cut Pro and let me know how fast that renders?

Oh, still only Windows?

Then, how does this comparison help anyone? Exactly? How much faster are you than your real competition, Intel or AMD? Oh, and how compatible, that would also be important. Unless those comparisons would not show you in a good light, of course. :)
I own a M2 MBA. It can't run an engineering software that I want to use, therefore, it must suck.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top