People have been buying the XS MAX in China. XR is dubbed by some as the poor man's iPhone.
No one has ever called it a poor man's iPhone.
People have been buying the XS MAX in China. XR is dubbed by some as the poor man's iPhone.
People have been buying the XS MAX in China. XR is dubbed by some as the poor man's iPhone.
True that.
Just reduce it to 5.5” and make it USD 649 and the sales will more than double.
Ignorance at its best. I guess when you're so engulfed in Apple you have no idea what's happening outside of the Apple world.
Wow. Just wow. As a graphic designer, I hope this isn’t the case.All design is a compromise.
True that.
Just reduce it to 5.5” and make it USD 649 and the sales will more than double.
Apple likely will sell 75-80M iPhones, like they have in the previous 2 Xmas quarters. Wallstreet will say that unit growth is flat and it's not good enough.1.) RE: "Kuo believes that iPhone shipments for the current quarter will be in the same 75–80 million range he previously predicted, ..."
If AAPL believed they we're going to sell that many iPhones during this current Quarter, they would NOT have decided "to NOT report" iPhones units @ their 1Q19 Earnings Call !
It appears that Kuo has something in common with Cook, they both Lack Basic Common Sense.
2.) Woz is on CNBC right now ... his first example of AAPL innovation was TouchID
At one time, Woz was a Brilliant man ... appears to be mostly "disconnected" now.
Unexpected, but clearly understandable once people use it. The 8/8+ is killing the XR. It's all about the ppi and sharper text on the 8. Pegatron had better ramp up the 50% increase quickly. Millions still prefer Touch ID to Face ID.
Cutting the resolution was no where near as big a mistake as reducing the ppi on the XR.
Why is Apple increasing their prices so much when competitors are offering similar technologies for less? I don't get it.
Apple is not selling fewer higher priced phones. Look at the ASP. More total units for a higher ASP than ever before. iPhone revenue grew 18% y/y. Can't argue with facts. If they sold fewer higher priced phones, they wouldn't have record iPhone revenue...by A LOT. Over $11B in fact.
Unit sales in 2015 were based on pent up demand for large screen phones. Apple just did $166B in revenue for iPhone, easily destroying the revenue for iPhone in any year.
Apple did $11B more in iPhone revenue in 2018 than in 2015 while selling fewer units. How did they do this? Selling MORE high priced iPhones. Simple math and about $100 more in ASP.
Actually, the XR has the same 326 PPI as the iPhone 8. The 8 Plus has a 401 PPI. Having said that, it doesn't make the XR's screen bad by any means.Since the XR has the exact same ppi as the 8/8 Plus, perhaps you'd like to try your fairy tale again with some facts? Like some evidence that TouchID is preferred by millions?
For those wishing for an SE2, I sympathize even though I prefer the 8/X screen sizes, but I those thinking the SE2 would be a best seller are delusional. The SE in its first year, even as the cheapest model, with the latest processor confounding analyst expectations, still was the worst selling model. I think the 5s black was the pinnacle of iPhone design, and hope the new IPads presage that the Xi will be a similar design and offered in Space Black matching the Watch, but I don't delude myself in expecting an SE2 to be a best seller. Perhaps 4 years of sales, and accommodating the few that want a smaller phone will justify a release in the spring.
XR sales may influence whether Apple thinks an SE with FaceID and edge to edge screen is worth it to them.
[doublepost=1542135462][/doublepost]
Why is Porsche increasing their prices so much when competitors offer similar technology for less? I don't get it.
Except I do. Similar isn't the same as, and a Porsche isn't a Toyota. The iPhone costs more but it offers more, and amortized over its supported lifetime, is comparable in price for a better experience.
Life is too short to compromise if you don't have to.
If you compare Apple's Q4 FY2018 iPhone unit sales vs Q4 FY2017, growth was flat. Meaning, unit sales didn't rise or drop, they stayed essentially the same. Revenue rose significantly because of higher iPhone ASP's. Had iPhone unit sales dropped YoY, those revenue growth numbers wouldn't be as significant.I don't believe you quite understand "simple math". It is entirely possible to sell fewer high priced phones and increase revenue substantially. All you have to do is increase the average selling price by a higher percentage than the unit sales dropped, which is exactly what Apple has done. They increased ASP by 16% while unit sales fell by 6%. They didn't necessarily sell MORE of the high priced phones (X, 8, and 8 Plus in 2018 vs. 6 and 6 Plus in 2015) as you assert as being fact, and it is quite likely they actually sold fewer of their flagship devices in 2018.
Pardon me, would you have any Grey Poupon?Since the XR has the exact same ppi as the 8/8 Plus, perhaps you'd like to try your fairy tale again with some facts? Like some evidence that TouchID is preferred by millions?
For those wishing for an SE2, I sympathize even though I prefer the 8/X screen sizes, but I those thinking the SE2 would be a best seller are delusional. The SE in its first year, even as the cheapest model, with the latest processor confounding analyst expectations, still was the worst selling model. I think the 5s black was the pinnacle of iPhone design, and hope the new IPads presage that the Xi will be a similar design and offered in Space Black matching the Watch, but I don't delude myself in expecting an SE2 to be a best seller. Perhaps 4 years of sales, and accommodating the few that want a smaller phone will justify a release in the spring.
XR sales may influence whether Apple thinks an SE with FaceID and edge to edge screen is worth it to them.
[doublepost=1542135462][/doublepost]
Why is Porsche increasing their prices so much when competitors offer similar technology for less? I don't get it.
Except I do. Similar isn't the same as, and a Porsche isn't a Toyota. The iPhone costs more but it offers more, and amortized over its supported lifetime, is comparable in price for a better experience.
Life is too short to compromise if you don't have to.
Apple told us the X was the best selling iPhone.I don't believe you quite understand "simple math". It is entirely possible to sell fewer high priced phones and increase revenue substantially. All you have to do is increase the average selling price by a higher percentage than the unit sales dropped, which is exactly what Apple has done. They increased ASP by 16% while unit sales fell by 6%. They didn't necessarily sell MORE of the high priced phones (X, 8, and 8 Plus in 2018 vs. 6 and 6 Plus in 2015) as you assert as being fact, and it is quite likely they actually sold fewer of their flagship devices in 2018.
My wife recently said she'd like to upgrade her iphone 8. Understandable. It's a tired design. Unfortunately, the only upgrades are bigger phones and she doesn't want that. Apple will likely provide her a solution later but that's on them. Big phones don't have to come at the exclusion of small ones.
No wonder! The XS is too big, too heavy und much too expensive. The XR is much too big, much too heavy und too expensive. Both are much, much too damageable, when falling down.
I am waiting and waiting for a desirable XR-Min, which is as solid as the SE was. My SE fell down several times without any damage. Best iPhone ever. And no, I don't like cases.
I switched from being a long time iPhone user to an Honor 8 when Apple couldn't deliver an iPhone 7 plus in jet black.
What a great device and it opened my eyes to how good many other manufacturers have become. Keeping features many people want (like TouchID and headphone jack), innovating way more than Apple the last couple of years, no comparison really, yet much lower prices than Apple. Apple has alienated too many of its core customers by trying to be "courageous".
After the Honor came P10 Plus and P20 Pro and soon Mate 20 Pro (better overall than any iPhone yet priced as the cheapest Xr over here in Europe (Sweden in my case). To me, Apple has lost its ways. However, I'll gladly come back if they start making high end phones, filled with features people want and that truly represent value despite the high prices, like they used to.
Huawei has put my focus back on smart phones; great devices at prices that truly represent value, that's why I've started upgrading way more than before, it's just so much fun!
Edit: And I still have an iPhone 6 just to keep in touch with iOS, but it rarely gets used.
I never understood that logic. The XR isn't that much cheaper. Dual SIM is also available in the Max. Nothing particular in that phone to target the asian market. Except the colors. Although, for Japan, should have some RGB LEDs in the frame that go off when someone calls. (Not suitable for people tending to have epileptic seizures)
Wow. Just wow. As a graphic designer, I hope this isn’t the case.
The notch is being copied because Apple are the giants and all other companies want to be associated with their design language. That doesn’t mean it’s good.
Maybe in the US, but certainly not in many other markets. As I said before, in Sweden Apple gets killed by Huawei price wise. Mate 20 Pro 128GB and 64GB iPhone Xr priced within $50 of each other. It's a walkover by Apple as far as I'm concerned.The iPhone XS Max starts at US$1,099 and the iPhone XR starts at US$749. That makes the iPhone XR 30% less expensive than the XS Max and puts it in a competive price range with other smartphone manufacturers like Huawei and Xiaomi.
It should read:
"almost everyone here in London can afford the £60 per month needed to own a brand new £999 iPhone XS."
And even that is a stretch.
Outside of the M25 and its commuter satellites your statement is just dead wrong.
It should read:
"almost everyone here in London can afford the £60 per month needed to own a brand new £999 iPhone XS."
And even that is a stretch.
Outside of the M25 and its commuter satellites your statement is just dead wrong.
I would say that every statement containing "almost everyone" is dead wrong, whatever the argument is