Hail, mighty Ming-Chi Kuo to save us from this insanity - there was no way that Apple would be dropping Lightning this soon.
I use the 29W charger to charge my iPhone all the time. The bigger question is will Apple sell new iPad Pros with stupid 12W charger? That is so ridiculous.It also sounds like people who have the 29W MacBook charger with a Lightning to USB-C cable who use it to charge The 12.9 inch iPad Pro twice as quickly will be able to charge the new iPhones with it much more quickly.
All three iPhones rumored to be launched in 2017 will retain Lightning connectors with the addition of USB-C Power Delivery for faster charging, including the all-new OLED model, according to KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.
![]()
An excerpt from his latest research note obtained by MacRumors:Kuo expects Apple to retain the Lightning port given its slimmer design compared to a USB-C port, MFi Program licensing income, and the fact that USB-C's high-speed data transmission is "still a niche application" for iPhone.
Kuo's prediction comes just two days after The Wall Street Journal seemingly reported that at least one upcoming iPhone model would have a USB-C port instead of a Lightning connector, but its wording was vague.
Article Link: Ming-Chi Kuo Says All 2017 iPhones Will Have Lightning Connectors With USB-C Fast Charging
Why don't you pay a paltry $3 per month to protect the data on your $800 iPhone?That's great. I pay $0 a month tethering to my Mac. Also iCloud is slow and not always reliable. Pass. But if it's so cheap then why can't Apple supply customers with more than a joke of 5GB. I mean they are set to ask a rumored $1K for the next flagship iPhone. Are you telling me they can't chip in another 95GB? Or a .50 USB-C adapter?
I don't have auto update on because I don't always want to update an app the minute it's released).
Why don't you pay a paltry $3 per month to protect the data on your $800 iPhone?
Since he syncs to his Mac, sounds like he's protecting his data for free?Why don't you pay a paltry $3 per month to protect the data on your $800 iPhone?
There are plenty of poor quality lightning cables that say "Made for iPhone" but are not.Ok, this is a plausible rumor that actually makes sense.
Getting rid of the Lightning port would have been singlehandedly the worst decision they could have made. However, the audio port needed to go, let's be honest (for all you iOS haters out there).
Phil Schiller made a point on stage during the iPhone 7 announcement that there are millions of Lightning connected accessories in the world. Why would Apple give that up? I'm all for USB-C but as the end connection to my computer or power source, but NOT on iOS devices.
Anyone heard of Benson Leung? He is an engineer at Google who reviews USB-C cables on Amazon and other sites. There are a number of reviews from him where he slams the manufacturer for producing a poor product that is either a fire hazard or shorts out the device because of overload. USB-C needs to be better regulated before it is widely adopted.
Apple has the strictest requirements for cable quality. Can you imagine people going to an Apple store with their iPhone complaining how a USB-C cable shorted their device? Yeah I can't either. That is why Apple will continue to use Lightning for their most popular product.
The Lightning port is here to stay for a long time. USB-A isn't.
Oops, edited...you do make good points but I agree with Chupa Chupa we still need wire charging and syncing as an option for now. I do iCloud backups update my apps on wifi usually but still consider the encrypted Mac backups to be my main backup.
Those cables exist today. If Apple includes it in the box they will likely leave out the USB-A to Lightning cable. So lots of people will have to buy the older cable separately.
Why don't you update apps over wifi?
Why don't you pay a paltry $3 per month to protect the data on your $800 iPhone?
That alone says something many people don't get. Apple doesn't adopt tech into their products unless they developed it themselves or the third party tech has been perfected to a decent enough level.1. OLED wasn't mature and Apple has to manufacture 50M+ of them.
It's nice to see Apple catching up with other manufacturers: OLED, edge-to-edge display, big batteries, fast charging and wireless charging have all been available on Android phones for a few years now.
Here we go again.
Like mp3 players existed before iPod
Like phones existed before iPhone
Like multytouch existed before
Like tablets existed before iPad
Like touch ID existed before iPhone 5s
Where does this end? What is it with Android fans mentality who thinks to be first is always the best?
Until the next thing comes along? You make it sound like USB-C is the last cable anyone will ever need.
of course it wont be the last cable anyone ever needs, I'm saying it would be nice.