Chundles said:Wait, you say you're desperately awaiting a 15" Yonah Mac laptop and yet you have cancelled your order for a MacBook Pro which is a 15" Yonah Mac laptop??
That's just weird. If you want it, buy it. Don't pissfart about waiting for something that may or may not exist. I doubt they'll do anything to the MacBook Pro line soon - it has been a whole 2 days now, are we getting a bit too demanding for updates now or what?
VidGuy said:Right....the "fastest BY FAR"? Sorry its a new world now. PC's may suck, and may be "behemoths", but we *will* be able to compare speeds. For instance, Dell is shipping a laptop with a 2 GHz Core Duo processor *right now*, so we know the MacBook isn't the fastest, even before it ships. Apple will have to sell on its OS and other features, size, etc. But don't make any speed claims. It will be interesting to see how the different OS's effect performance, however...
Also, most software on these MacBooks won't even be native x86...will there still be any speed increase when using Rosetta? A speed decrease? What can someone expect to see in the real world before new software is avaliable? I think I'll pass on the first gen of MacBooks.
Vid
If this source is credible - and I believe it is - the product(s) will quickly date the MacBook Pro's announced at MacWorld. That would not be a Plasma, or a Mini. Maybe a Tablet - but I don't see that either. It's hard to think that it would even be the 12.1-inch or 13.3-inch consumer oriented iBooks ThinkSecrect speculated on since those wouldn't really keep a pro user from buying the higher end MacBook. I can't figure out for the life of me, what this source is talking about. Well, I was waiting for a 12 or 13-inch notebook anyways, so it will be easy for me to wait and seeHe also said that if he were me, he probably wouldn't order one of the new MacBook Pros.
I asked if there would be MacBook replacements for the 17-inch and 12-inch PowerBooks, but he said, "Oh, it's much cooler than that. Much cooler"
Plantman said:The only questions I had was why was there a second imac on the podium? Was there a danger of reliability?
VidGuy said:Right....the "fastest BY FAR"? Sorry its a new world now. PC's may suck, and may be "behemoths", but we *will* be able to compare speeds. For instance, Dell is shipping a laptop with a 2 GHz Core Duo processor *right now*, so we know the MacBook isn't the fastest, even before it ships. Apple will have to sell on its OS and other features, size, etc. But don't make any speed claims. It will be interesting to see how the different OS's effect performance, however...
Also, most software on these MacBooks won't even be native x86...will there still be any speed increase when using Rosetta? A speed decrease? What can someone expect to see in the real world before new software is avaliable? I think I'll pass on the first gen of MacBooks.
Vid
ihayden said:He has always had two machines on-stage. Once he had a crash and he had to move to the "back-up" machine. It is just-in-case.
asphalt-proof said:You bring up an interesting point: No longer are speed comparisons going to be the hueristic. Now it will be "how well does the software utilize the power of the chip", "How stable is the software" etc. There paradigm is really shifting.
Sunrunner said:Exactly. Finally the Winblows pundits can take their speed arguments and shove them, because it will all become an OS-centric argument.
cjboffoli97 said:Having just returned from CES where I saw everyone doing media centers, I have to think that Apple MUST be doing this too and sometime soon. But methinks they're smart to wait and devote the available Duo chips to the new iMacs and Macbooks. The latter is the eventual incarnation of the "Powerbook G5" that everyone was waiting for. The demand will be huge. I've already ordered mine and I currently own a perfectly good 15" Powerbook 1.67GHz.
BlueRevolution said:did you all really think that or are you just making that up now that this rumour is out? because I didn't notice anything unusual...
more likely they want the announcements to come at roughly the same time from different manufacturers to avoid the appearance of favouritism.
this Intel thing, I tell you... it's brought nothing but trouble. well, and 4x faster PowerBooks...![]()
Sunrunner said:Exactly. Finally the Winblows pundits can take their speed arguments and shove them, because it will all become an OS-centric argument.
esXXI said:Would make sense why Steve spent like 45 minutes just demo-ing iLife..
bugfaceuk said:Queue M$ spending a couple of million PROVING that Windows is faster/cheaper/more secure than anything else especially that crappy OS-X.
other said:
dwbarcl said:MacBook Pro is not shipping until February, so why not announce the "so called delayed item and just say they are shipping when ever.
Steve is smater than we think. He is probably the one that leaks all of the rumors anyway.