Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
bhirt said:
If apple had some "cool" product, they would have announced it. Intel has never had supply issues like what's implied in this article.

A couple of thoughts:

* It doesn't have to be "supply issues", just unavailability. Core Solos aren't available yet and Intel never said they would be. The low-power version of Yonah isn't available yet, either.

* It is interesting that the new MacBook Pro doesn't have the same screen as the 15" Powerbook, especially considering the quality problems Apple had with the new 15" powerbook screen. Why else change the Powerbook screen in late 2005 if not to reduce risks for MacBook? I'm sure that Apple intended to use the late 2005 powerbook screens for the MacBook Pro or MacBook also.

* Apple is clearly planning to do some special event to coincide with its 30th birthday
 
strange......at lease a black shuffle sounds good....
maybe sth like....
MacBook Nano?

performance of intel core duo is good and far from expected, but same enclosue wouldn't rocks too much, at least to me.
may be, iMac G5 is too iconic....so that they continue to use it, at least for the first release of intel chips....
 
d.f said:
Steve said if you wanted to buy the MacBook "get your orders in early"

I also pointed this out yesterday in the new iMac thread. It seemed very strange the way he said it, and where it was placed in context with his previous comments; statements.

I'm placing bets on an Apple cell phone/pda type device and the rumored dvr mac mini (tho i'd rather not see the mini go in that direction)

"Mobile Me" trademark.....come on.

As far as Intel not being able to supply Apple; When Intel first releases a chip they don't make a great deal of them simply because the lack of doing so will breed more demand and more profit; give them a position to demand certain things and prices. It's not a "Tame Jobs" thing.

As far as the plasma crap, no way in hell. Be honest with yourself... They could not produce something that "common man" can afford at this point, which is the starting position needed behind the tv/pc "revolution" most are wanting.
 
omg MacBook makes sense if there are gonna be MacTablets. It just makes SENSE!
But i wonder where they would put an iSight on a tablet... no one wants to see your close up hand unless he got some fetish ^^

But just imagine a Palm-Thing made by apple. That would be something as cool as an iPod! And you could use it as an iPod with some sort of "TouchWheel" or "TipWheel" (Clickwheel simulated on the screen where you tip the finger instead of klicking). Then flip it 90° to have the large screen for videos. And with OSX you certainly would be able to actually work with these things too. Even widgets ma work since they are java and dont ea too much resources and some of these widgets can be very useful on a tabletMac (lets call it tMac).

And the best is: appe might actually do this. THey already have the knowhow making a portable device with some graphic horsepower and great user interface. It would even allow to put some phone functions in there (Clickwheel would work to dial in numbers like on the old wheel-phones, but you already have most numbers in the adress book, right). But for SMS-Typing, the wheel just won't do. A displayed keyboard would do. Or even iChat using UMTS for the video.

Now one thing I'd like the hardcore geek programmers to do: Fast user switching between OSX and other OS (Win, Linux). I understand it must be tricky to boot 2 different OS at the same time, but I'd really like to have that.
 
Nice guy!!!!! I like your words!!!!
Peoples are long wishing a faster "powerbook" and now make it for you in its highest priority. Instead of waiting until June, Apple offers it 4 months ahead. Personally I hate the aluminium enclosure, but I think Apple have alreay done a good job. For those who are urgent, just 1-click and get your new "powerbook".

Acer?! Ferrari fans only, and don't forget to extend your warrantry...
but.....are you going to use Windows XP instead of Mac OS X?



BRLawyer said:
The MacBookPro is, BY FAR, the fastest, nicest and most stable notebook on Earth (please don't come with Acer or those behemoths from Alienware)...FW800 has been dropped because it's DEAD and not necessary in terms of market demand (show me ONE branded PC laptop that has it). Modem is DEAD, too, or you may just buy a cheapo, small one at the Apple Store...S-Video out is available with a cheap adapter from Apple too, and DVI/VGA are already there. 60 PIXELS less?? Oh the horrors!!! You get a brighter display than any crappy PC out there and you complain now? Go figure.
 
I knew there had to be spmthing else. The annoucments werent all that exciting, you could even call it a speed bump. This post will annoy some people but we didnt really see anything THAT new, a new media centre mac mini would have been good.
 
BRLawyer said:
The MacBookPro is, BY FAR, the fastest, nicest and most stable notebook on Earth (please don't come with Acer or those behemoths from Alienware)...FW800 has been dropped because it's DEAD and not necessary in terms of market demand (show me ONE branded PC laptop that has it). Modem is DEAD, too, or you may just buy a cheapo, small one at the Apple Store...S-Video out is available with a cheap adapter from Apple too, and DVI/VGA are already there. 60 PIXELS less?? Oh the horrors!!! You get a brighter display than any crappy PC out there and you complain now? Go figure.

I greatly dislike the Macbook (tho I, for one, like the name). It looks strange, the specs are somewhat strange (dunno why I think they are) and for something so fast, nice, and stable...no attention was paid to it. Sick or not, Jobs would have did everything minus humping the thing if it was THAT wonderful.

He didn't sell it and, again, as I said yesterday in the intel imac thread, if anything this was simply a "See we can do it" piece.

The only thing, in my opinon, it has going for it is the fact it's the first Intel powered laptop, other than that..... I feel it's a dud.
 
I don't want a camera constantly looking at me. Please, Apple, offer us a ProBook with camera optional. The light comes on when the camera is on, but that's software, so it could be made to turn on without the light on. Spy(hard)ware? Someone mentioned it is only 60 pixels, but that is only height. Multiply it by 1440 width and you get 86,400 pixels missing for a stupid camera.

Longing for the next Apple Event already.
 
Merom MacBook said:
I don't want a camera constantly looking at me. Please, Apple, offer us a ProBook with camera optional. The light comes on when the camera is on, but that's software, so it could be made to turn on without the light on.
The light-to-camera connection is hardware. Apple even have a patent application on this :D
 
UberMac said:
Has anybody noticed that on the Store page (UK, haven't checked US) the image of front row on the iMac (intel) has a completely different "movies" logo to normal? Perhaps a sign of updates to front row coming soon,

The icons Front Row uses are the ones used by the iLife apps so I'm guessing that the new iMovie has a different icon in iLife 06.
 
new macs

There is never a right time to buy a new mac, you will always be wanting the latest and greatest. Best thing is to buy what you need and be happy with it. Forget about the rumors. I can't see how you can go wrong purchasing a new mac since apple has settled on intel chips. It's dual processors man! The pc world is still selling singles.
 
ART5000 said:
on the limited duos

why is it that Apple has chips that are below 2.0 and other compnaines like acer have the 2.1 chips? could someone comment on this:confused:

My guess is that Apple still has quite a large amount of PPC Macs in stock. If Apple pushes the specs so far up, who is going to help them clear out the remaining stock of the PPC Macs? Notice that they are still selling all the PPC Macs for the same price in the Apple store website.

Oh and by the way, I have not read up to the latest responses yet, so maybe someone else has already said the following: I think the product that they had ready was probably something with Merom inside, but intel would not exclusively let Apple have Merom chips so much earlier than the others. intel probably doesn't have the guts to upset the rest of the world just to please Apple. Maaaybe someday this will change, when Apple finally gets more market share than Dell and Sony combined in the PC market. :D
 
ok, "get your orders in early"? there are always backlogs when something new comes out. hence the advice.

and tablets are soo... 2002. neat idea, but handwriting recognition and the rest just aren't there. and imagine playing games on a computer with neither keyboard nor mouse.

MrCrowbar, you'll be able to do fast user switching between OSes as soon as Microsoft releases VPC 8 in universal binary (so in a year or two). then just have two user accounts, run VPC fullscreen on one and do your Mac stuff on the other.

or realize that in fact it's exactly the same whether you have Windows in a window (oh the irony) or in a seperate user account.
 
nomad01 said:
The icons Front Row uses are the ones used by the iLife apps so I'm guessing that the new iMovie has a different icon in iLife 06.

I don't think so...becasue in all the other places..Steves dock and other pics the iMove icon for 05 and 06 is the same ;)
 
Chundles said:
Yup, we're getting hit pretty hard here too.

1.67GHz MacBook Pro = AUD$3199 = US$2401.50 = €2030
1.83GHz MacBook Pro = AUD$3999 = US$3002.50 = €2537

These are the same prices as the 15" and 17" PowerBooks respectively.

In the US they add the sales tax on afterwards, making the pricing rather fair when compared to the tax charged in most American States.
 
!!! ahh

im so frustrated. a day after the mac book bro was released.. this rumor comes up. im in dire want of a mac labtop and when i saw the mac book pro it was the perfect fit. now what?
 
direzz said:
im so frustrated. a day after the mac book bro was released.. this rumor comes up. im in dire want of a mac labtop and when i saw the mac book pro it was the perfect fit. now what?


Now what???

The tipster said virtually nothing, what's the point of remaining anonymous on the tip "Expect something cool soon from Apple"

We always do, so nothing new.
 
direzz said:
im so frustrated. a day after the mac book bro was released.. this rumor comes up. im in dire want of a mac labtop and when i saw the mac book pro it was the perfect fit. now what?

Get the MacBook Pro. No question. You say it's perfect for you so get it. Honestly, when you buy technology it's obsolete as soon as you open the box. You may as well bite the bullet and get some use out of it rather than just sitting around not using a machine that may or may not exist.
 
Here in London, there are stores selling discounted Mac Minis... this only happens with Apple's consent, and almost always only occurs when there is an update due...

No Mac Minis were announced, but the signs for an imminent update are there...
 
For those who want a freaking fast notebook, buy the MacBook and be happy!!!

Like said by BRLawyer, it's the best Book ever launched. So, stop with bla bla bla and, if you have the money, if you joined that "powerbook G5 next tuesday", buy the MacBook for christ's sake.

People here are so used to complain everyday because "there were no powerbooks G5 and I want to buy one" that when Apple releases a great laptop they feel the need to complain again...
 
SeaFox said:
What's slightly ironic is Steve is waiting on Intel due to supply issues. I know these are new chips and all, but really. Even Intel, the chip supplier, the big kahuna, is unable to quench lowly Apple's appetite for high preformance yet cool running processors.

Wasn't a big reason we switched to Intel because their massive production capacity was supposed to end these sort of shortfalls?

Well, this is pretty common for Intel when they roll out a new chip. In fact, it's pretty common for just about every chip manufacturer; IBM, Motorola, Intel and AMD.

There are ALOT of PC builders who will be placing larger orders than Apple. and Intel will supply them depending on their importance, and the size of the order.

In a few weeks, everything will settle down.
 
Fabio_gsilva said:
For those who want a freaking fast notebook, buy the MacBook and be happy!!!

Like said by BRLawyer, it's the best Book ever launched. So, stop with bla bla bla and, if you have the money, if you joined that "powerbook G5 next tuesday", buy the MacBook for christ's sake.

People here are so used to complain everyday because "there were no powerbooks G5 and I want to buy one" that when Apple releases a great laptop they feel the need to complain again...

If you were in the market for a new notebook would you buy the 1st release of wait for it to bed in?
 
Bye Bye Baby said:
The thing that convinces me is the observation about the keynote address. He went on forever about iLife and iWork that really was a lot of crap. I was disappointed with the keynote. He gave the impression that he was plugging holes at the last minute. I am sure there is a lot more cool stuff to come. Otherwise Apple is in deep trouble. All the hype to have only two computers that really aren't much of a revolution- there needs to be more.

I agree with, well, part of that. Jobs always gives major attention to a new release of iLife. He went on forever about iLife 05 when it was released, and there weren't many thrilled Appleheads coming to his defense when he spent more than 20 mins just on Garageband with iLife 04.

What was kind of surprising was that iWork got almost nothing, attention-wise, this time around. That doesn't bode well for a new application suite just starting it's second semester.

Otherwise, I agree that it was a disappointing keynote this time. Not a word about Leopard, and it was prime time for more than several words since Microsoft just showed off Vista. Most will probably say that Leopard is best left to WWDC, as OS updates have been in the past, but this time around things are different. In the past, Microsoft didn't have a new OS to talk about, whereas this year (supposedly) they do. And I suspect Microsoft will make the most of first half of the year (and beyond) pimping Vista. Apple had the perfect opportunity to counter that with a world-wide audience fixated and ready to report on anything Jobs had to say, and he didn't say anything. I really hope they are paying attention and not gearing up to make the same mistakes they made when Windows 95 was released.

And a brand new iMac? Just after they released the last brand new iMac with major public fanfare only 2 months ago with a wink towards the fact that Christmas was coming up? Thats a pretty good way to start pissing your customers off. And that iMac wasn't much of an update, all things considered. A pretty meek speed bump, slightly redesigned thiner case, iSight (nothing new) and a couple of software tidbits thrown in (Front Row and Photo booth). Not exactly earth shattering.


The new Macbooks, although maybe a relief to deprived Powerbook fans, aren't all that dazzling. It looks like they basically swapped the PPC chip for the Intel chip, and, well, here you go. Nothing like the G5 when it came out. It was redesigned from the ground up, new architecture, motherboard, case, the works. They didn't just slap a G5 into an existing Powermac G4 box. And as Gruber noted on his blog, Powerbooks are still somewhat ominously present in the line-up. Kind of unusual, and it makes you wonder whether Rosetta is really up to the task, at least for the pro end. It just seems rushed, with little to zero in the way of new attention-getting technologies (the intel chip was expected) or anything particularly exciting.

The poor little Shuffle was shuffled out the door, maybe next year. No major announcement regarding new video content on iTunes, or any new technologies related to delivering movies or enhanced video. If you go by the what was happening at CES, it seems that's the direction virtually all the major players in technology are headed this year. Where's Apple?

Frankly, I thought the last several keynotes have been disappointing, all of them since last year's WWDC. The WWDC keynote was impressive, if not surprising. But Apple's foray into video with the iPod and the music store has, so far, been tepid at best, at least by Apple standards. It seems to be banking more on the recognition of Apple's name, the iPod phenom and the music store, and not so much on new, groundbreaking, innovative, head-turning technologies or amazing content deals. It will probably succeed well enough for now with the iPod association, but when somebody figures out how to do feature films over the internet right, it just might change things the way Apple did with music, the iPod, and the music store.

So, if it's true that Apple dumped a lot of stuff planned for Macworld...well, I actually hope that was the case.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.