Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If Disney+ was connected to MoviesAnywhere I could justify this, but no way should a $30 movie be locked behind a 2nd paywall.
Nobody’s forcing you to buy it. Wait a few months anew watching it on Disney+ for free.

I say no way anybody should pay $15 a ticket to see a movie on opening night in a crowded theater in an uncomfortable chair where popcorn costs $10 a serving and the floors are sticky from spilled coke, but to each his or her own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WiseAJ and TJ82
Umm it's really not a bad deal considering how this is a theatrical release and generally speaking if you go to the movies, you're going with at least 1-2 people which easily makes up for the $30/$35 price tag. Combine that will the fact that you can watch it limitless times during that month (if you don't want to maintain disney plus). Presumably it will eventually become part of the regular Disney+ catalog and/or be possible to rent/buy in the traditional sense (if this is still possible with disney movies).

But what does "theatrical release" mean in this context? Simply that you'll have it sooner than people who are willing to wait for the exact same movie to be released for a reasonable price.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: TJ82
When you see a Disney or marvel film, you going with the family / friends. You’re spending $50+ regardless. This is $30 to watch as many times as you want. Swear people love to complain just cus it’s Disney.
 
So I understand why they’re charging this amount. They can’t charge $15 per person in a family anymore at the theater, so they have to make it up somehow. But I feel bad for people who just want to watch it by themselves.
 
So I understand why they’re charging this amount. They can’t charge $15 per person in a family anymore at the theater, so they have to make it up somehow. But I feel bad for people who just want to watch it by themselves.
Don’t feel too bad. If they can’t afford the $30 (which would probably be what one ticket plus snacks costs at a theater anyway), they can wait a couple of months and stream it on Disney+.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TJ82
Sounds about right from a company that routinely pulls movies of the market, like the Lion King, only to re-release them ten years later to eagerly awaiting fans. If you ask me, it’s brilliantly devious. The pinnacle of commercialism, corporate greed and obsessive consumerism.
 
Im sure people will torrent it at that price

Came here to say this. $30? That’s more than the price of a BluRay 12 years ago. And it’s only as long as you maintain your subscription, you don’t even keep it.

lol!
 
This is similar to how ESPN+ and UFC operate. With ESPN+ you get access to premium content until there is a pay-per-view event, then you gotta pay the $69.99.

the same thing goes for this. It’s premium content. And if you want to watch it when it’s released, you gotta pay. If you don’t want to pay, you can just wait for it to become available just like how a movie premieres in theaters and then makes its way to dvd/bluray then some sort of streaming service.
 
The not knowing if the disease you catch is CV-19, the flu, or just a bad cold. The 45 minutes of previews. The 10 minutes of commercials leading into the previews. The fun of guessing what it is you just stepped in. The tech bros in the row behind you who keep babbling throughout the movie. The person in front of you who won’t turn off their phone screen. The occasional mass shooter.
I’m not stepping inside a theater any time this year (at least - I’ll be refraining long after others return), but as to the rest, clearly you aren’t frequenting the right theaters. My preferred theater has 8-10 minutes of previews (about that much, I actually like), and zero commercials, its auditoriums are quite clean, and the staff will come deal with people who won’t shut up or turn off their phones. One or two of the staff come in at the beginning, introduce themselves, go over the rules, and tell how many minutes of trailers there will be. It’s really quite civilized. And I miss going there.

As far as shooters at movie theaters go, yes, that has happened once or twice. But it’s not like theaters are a hotbed of shootings. If not getting shot is your overriding concern at all times, there’s a whole list of other places to avoid first.

(And in general, it’s insane and depressing that mass shootings are a thing that’s common enough that one sometimes has to check which mass shooting someone is speaking about - that’s one of the things that makes the US “special”. Sigh.)
 
Came here to say this. $30? That’s more than the price of a BluRay 12 years ago. And it’s only as long as you maintain your subscription, you don’t even keep it.

lol!
It's about the price of 2 tickets in most large movie theaters, and you don't get to keep or rewatch that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Sweet! Buying it IAP as soon as it’s out. Not worried about losing access to it since I already paid for the 3 years of Disney+ deal. I can watch it several times, and show it to my family as well so well worth the $30. (Much better value than $20 for Trolls etc for only 48 hours)
 
I’m not stepping inside a theater any time this year (at least - I’ll be refraining long after others return), but as to the rest, clearly you aren’t frequenting the right theaters. My preferred theater has 8-10 minutes of previews (about that much, I actually like), and zero commercials, its auditoriums are quite clean, and the staff will come deal with people who won’t shut up or turn off their phones. One or two of the staff come in at the beginning, introduce themselves, go over the rules, and tell how many minutes of trailers there will be. It’s really quite civilized. And I miss going there.

As far as shooters at movie theaters go, yes, that has happened once or twice. But it’s not like theaters are a hotbed of shootings. If not getting shot is your overriding concern at all times, there’s a whole list of other places to avoid first.

(And in general, it’s insane and depressing that mass shootings are a thing that’s common enough that one sometimes has to check which mass shooting someone is speaking about - that’s one of the things that makes the US “special”. Sigh.)


we have a lot of theaters around here, but they all feature the 45 minutes of nonsense before the opening reel. I’d happily pay extra not to see that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ and gijoeinla
A family with 4 or 5 people will see this as a bargain.




Let's draw it up another day, a stores like Costco or Sam's Club have membership fees to go inside of the store, and you get to purchase items that they sell. Think of the store membership fees as your D+ subscription and buying Mulan as something you'd buy in store.

This model isn't for everyone, but as I mentioned people with 4 or 5 people will see it as a bargain.
The difference is that whatever you buy at Costco you eventually bring home and it stays yours, whereas here you would have to bring your purchase back to Costco after you end your membership, with no refund.
 
This seems steep but here’s some perspective from the other side. Let’s say the film played in theaters here in US. The first week take at the box office is a 90/10 split. Second week run 80/20, 70/30 and so on.

So the fact that Disney will likely only stream on a service that allows in-app pricing and probably a set cut agreed in advance - Apple or any other service is dumb to not jump at the chance.

I’m a film industry veteran - and under a new paradigm - $30 for your own private in home experience for a FIRST RUN film that’s a great deal actually. The question is will Apple allow an exception? I would if I were them. Why? Because Apple could easily at some point start the same offering - a world premiere at a set price. Seriously - I’m shocked music artists have sat on their butts through this pandemic and not done “live” PPV’s... in fact comedians, etc .. I’m baffled. Bottom line - I think this is a win for Disney, for families, and for whoever lets Disney use the in the in app exception in exchange for a smaller “first run” cut. What’s the downside?
 
What I hate about this is that you don’t own it for $30. You just have access to it until you cancel your subscription. This is a way for Disney to keep people from cancelling their membership. I’m okay with waiting for this to be released on 4K Blu-ray which will have a digital copy for the same $30. Or I’ll wait for it to be available to me on D+ later down the road.

Im also the kind of person that hates buying digital because at any moment you can lose access to that content. This is why I always buy physical copies. when possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spacetime Anomaly
So you pay for a streaming service... to only then have to pay for an individual movie? Not sure if they thought that business model through...

Maybe if they added a higher tier streaming service with early access.
 
Maybe the title should be Mula..
As for the $30.. more that a theater ticket.. well.. if you could haul the whole crew in on one $30 ticket..
 
So you pay for a streaming service... to only then have to pay for an individual movie? Not sure if they thought that business model through...

Maybe if they added a higher tier streaming service with early access.
Is you wait that movie will come included with the service down the line. The extra price is to see it earlier when it's just released, along the lines of going out to see it in a movie theater when it's just released.
 
I’m on the fence on this. $30 is pretty steep but as a family of 4. That’s usually 1/3 of what a usual movie theater visit would cost. Plus I can pause and rewatch it if I so want to.

do I get to ”own it” at that price or is this a rental? I don’t like the thought of this as a precedent in streaming services
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: mcic1984 and EugW
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.