I have insurance on my car. And I have warranties on my appliances. I have covers on my furniture, and I clean regularly. I often find that when you take preventative measures, your investments often are safer than when you don't.
Exactly. So rather than wrapping your car in a hideous plastic housing, you pay a small amount monthly and if the car gets damaged, it get's fixed for a small deductible.
If only Apple offered a similar service. What a time to be alive THAT would be...
If you like the way the case looks/feels, fine. If you are a clumsy deep sea oil rig worker that drops his phone 5 times a day, fine. There ARE circustances where cases are fantastic. There aren't many, but I'm not saying naked is for everyone, just 99%.
My overarching point has always been that for the VAST majority of people, AC+ is an insanely superior option to a $34.95 case.
Just like your car. There isn't an OCD'er on the planet that would put an OtterBox defender on a Ferrari... It'd be ridiculous, and goofy looking, and downright hillarious. But a $750 phone? Oh hells to the YA! Wrap that muther UP
Scratches? Scratches happen all the time on cars. People don't freak out, because they understand that as a device they use every day, it's going to show a LITTLE wear and tear. If it's bad (keyed as an example), insurance steps in. Dirty? Wash it. Crack a windshield? Replace it.
But put a case on your car? LMAO... Of course not. Even clear-bra's can look ridiculous if they're not done well. The beauty of a nice car is too nice to hide with crap all over it, so people don't, even if it'd "protect" it.
Go naked. Buy AC+ if you need to. You'll enjoy the phone more, save money on cases, and eventually will thank me. Again, there ARE instances where even I endorse a case, they just comprise about 1% of users. The rest... well, don't put a plastic (or leather) shell on your Ferrari