Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nah I was mostly keeping my sub alive because friends and family still wanted to watch it with some frequency. Now that they don’t get to use it non of the plans really justify me keep paying. Plenty of other content to enjoy elsewhere.
This is exactly what they are going after. People like you.

I’m sure some of those leeches will sub on their own and Netflix will be happy.
 
This is exactly what they are going after. People like you.

I’m sure some of those leeches will sub on their own and Netflix will be happy.

I set up a new Plex server a few months back in anticipation of this for friends and family with a lot of the stuff they enjoy. I don’t think any of us individually watched enough to justify even the cheapest individual plans.
 
Last edited:
Nothing is funnier then a bunch of people on an Apple forum who have no problem dropping $1000+ for the newest iPhone in a different color every year whining about not being able to share a $15 subscription plan with their college friends and dear old grandma who just wants to watch Virgin River.
 
As long as the streams you pay for cover the sharing, then yes. Remember that time Netflix tweeted "Love is sharing a password"? I do.

"Love is sharing a password" is not the same thing as "Love is sharing a password with grown-a** adults who refuse to pay for their own service in direct violation of our terms of service that you agreed to"

A good decision or not (who knows; I have no stake in Netflix and don't really care a whole lot since I don't share my password with anyone but my immediate family) it makes some sense. An average 4-stream account, properly used in one household, is almost surely going to be using a lot fewer than 4 streams at any given point (I'd bet there are internal stats on average streams per day or hour per account). The number is likely higher if it's being used outside of a household, so it costs more to provide the service in the latter scenario.

Agreed. The fact that all content isn't available in 4K for free (meaning without an up-charge) in 2023 is ridiculous.

Agree with you there.
 
I really don't understand the vitriol. Company sells product. Customer agrees to End user agreement and buys product. Customer gets mad when company enforces rules in agreement. For profit company attempts to stay profitable. Please help me understand the other side of this.
The rules have changed over the years. Many of the use cases they are cracking down on today used to be explicitly permitted in their terms (I'd know, I actually read the terms to confirm I was above board at the time). Even when the terms were later updated to no longer explicitly permit many of those uses, Netflix made a point of indicating they were turning a blind eye towards those uses (e.g. see Netflix's tweet that's circulating in these comments).

This isn't just about them enforcing an existing policy. It's about them having changed the written and unwritten policies over the years. It's fine if they want to do that, but this enforcement is the first time that many long-time users are being confronted with changes to those policies that they may not have noticed, so being upset is a reasonable response.

Another factor is that many users are concerned that their atypical-but-legitimate use cases may be adversely affected by an automated enforcement system, which would prevent them from using a service that they are legitimately entitled to use (e.g. spouse traveling for work). With any system of this scale there tends to be a long-tail of use cases. Any given one may be unusual, but the sum of them can affect a not insignificant portion of the legitimate user base.
 
Do people actually watch TV when they are traveling? I am sorry, but when I am in a distant country, I have far better things to do than watch, "Who Wants to Fart Like a Millionaire?" You can catch up on your shows when you get home. (Honestly, I am avoiding all TV at the moment in support of the writers strike.)

Some of us travel for work or live abroad for extended periods so "hav(ing) far better things to do" is either impractical while working or we simply want to relax at home while abroad and catch up on our shows.

And, yes, while many services georestrict, VPNs let me watch services I pay for even when outside of my home countr at various times.

Apples and oranges. People pay for a number of screens.

Which is why I think Netflix will eventually morph their prices to allow sharing ta the highest tier but bake the cost into the price.

Remember when Netflix tweeted "Love is sharing a password"? I do.

It was the old drug dealer gambit - give product away, get people hooked, then start charging.

Made sense as a startup competing with B&M video stores.

I really don't understand the vitriol. Company sells product. Customer agrees to End user agreement and buys product. Customer gets mad when company enforces rules in agreement. For profit company attempts to stay profitable. Please help me understand the other side of this.

This is the intrenet. We expect everything to be free and run how we think it should; no need to face reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacWiz_007
I am self employed and have an office. I watch Netflix sometimes on my lunch break in the office? Are Netflix now saying this will cost extra?
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Whelp. Sounds like I’ll be missing all the great Netflix shows. Oh well 😩 YouTube is still free and there’s entertainment there.
 
I really don't understand the vitriol. Company sells product. Customer agrees to End user agreement and buys product. Customer gets mad when company enforces rules in agreement. For profit company attempts to stay profitable. Please help me understand the other side of this.
No vitriol here. Before everyone who used my account were chipping in their share of the fee. Now that Netflix is enforcing the new rule we can’t do that any more and non of us individually can really justify the lower tier plans. It’s simple economics.
 
No, that is not what is happening. I travel all the time and will watch on my iPad or my Mac while my AppleTVs sit at home. Traveling with your own devices is fine. What they are cracking down on is people that share their account with people that do not live in the account owners household. People that travel, kids at college, people on vacation, etc are just fine.

I believe their main criteria is "does your legal mailing address match the account owners". This of course covers kids at college. Your cousin that live 5 states away... not so much.
How in the world would Netflix monitor people that have a permanent address at household but live 9 months of year in a college dorm?

🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: aParkerMusic
No vitriol here. Before everyone who used my account were chipping in their share of the fee. Now that Netflix is enforcing the new rule we can’t do that any more and non of us individually can really justify the lower tier plans. It’s simple economics.
Oh for sure. If a customer no longer feels they are getting the proper value for their money, by all means cancel. I just don't get why Netflix is demonized.
 
How in the world would Netflix monitor people that have a permanent address at household but live 9 months of year in a college dorm?

🤔

A fair question, but as far as I know, people who have the same legal address as the account owner are covered as being part of the "household". I imagine travelers might have to endure the occasional "verification" checks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JM
Same as “what’s happens on the iPhone, says on the iPhone”. It’s a slogan not a statement of absolute truth. As was netflixes’ tweet. It’s a slogan to encourage password sharing “within the household “, not with 500 of your closest friends and family.
That might be how you interpret it, but most people took it at face value, which they should have. "Love is sharing a password" is not their slogan by the way, and it never has been. It was a statement via tweet. We all know what it meant. They are just flip flopping on it now because it bit them in the a__.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aParkerMusic
Just remember, corporations are people too and they have feelings! And they desperately need you to defend them. So rise up and be warriors for Netflix, they can’t do it on their own.

As for me, I’m gonna go over here and weep a bit more for the poor corporations that have to endure such hatred from the masses. :( And I’m gonna report all you guys cyberbullying Netflix!
 
I'm seriously surprised the Internet is freaking out... no wait, not surprised at all. They should have done this from day 1 and it's always been something you shouldn't have been doing and now they choose to enforce it. Business works because people pay them money. Fascinating I know. So if you share your password with 10 other people, that's potentially at least some of those people who wouldn't pay Netflix and get it for free.

Simple. Not even worth a story.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.