Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And they just laid off 300 more people... Not looking good...

Rising fees, lackluster content, blaming customers for low profits, and a market full of competition that's hitting it out of the park... I'll re-sub if they tun it around, but I don't see it happening, realistically.
everyone keeps saying lackluster content…they just had the biggest streaming show in the world with Squid Game. They are very hit and miss but so is HBO. Half their shows I don’t make it past the first episode. Cancelled Disney because their streaming content was so weak. Let free Apple lapse because already saw Ted Lasso. Most shows on broadcast TV don’t make it past the first season. Thats the business.
 
Don't know why people got so unhappy with a cheaper option. Making previous service levels more expensive is the real bummer.
 
They're trying to get rid of password sharing.
They’re “trying” from many years, and considering its not something hard to implement, seems they’re not so interesting in doing it. Get rid of account sharing means get rid of many customers...
 
The content sucks for the most part. And when it doesn’t, they cancel the show after a season or two when it starts to get expensive. And they charge for 4K.

Putting in advertisers won’t help. We’re all running away from the cable model of mountains of crap content, nothing to watch, and ads we have to sit through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrancyGoose
That some people are willing to put up with ads to save a measly $10 a month is crazy.

People complaining about Netflix charging extra for 4k seem to forget that bandwidth cost are higher and a couple extra bucks a month for the ones that want it isn't a big deal.
It doesn't really cost Netflix more money to serve 480p, 1080p, or 4K content since they have their Open Connect Appliances (OCAs) set up.

The different pricing tiers is just to get people to pay up for higher resolution content.




Premium streaming sites can’t use storage and web hosting as an excuse for selling SD and HD video at different prices. Maybe it just costs more for websites to deliver HD video to customers, so they offer SD video at a reduced price. That makes sense, right?

Of course not. Streaming services operate over Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) and Open Connect Appliances (OCAs), which significantly reduces the cost and difficulty of HD content delivery. These terms sound very abstract and dense, but they’re really quite simple.

Internet traffic is like regular traffic. If everybody tries to take one road, then they’re going to create a traffic jam and move very slowly. The same thing happens on websites. To combat this problem, streaming services build CDNs. A CDN is a dense, global network of servers that all contain the same content. They’re like different roads to the same destination. This way, Netflix doesn’t come to a standstill every time a new season of Stranger Things comes out.

OCAs are similar to CDNs, but they’re built to prevent traffic jams on the entire internet, rather than just a single website. Like OCAs, CDNs contain an extensive library of videos, and they’re spread around the globe. The big difference is that CDNs are operated by your internet service provider. When your entire neighborhood goes to watch the new season of Stranger Things, your ISP will redirect that internet traffic to a CDN, which keeps non-Stranger Things fans from experiencing any internet traffic jams.

Obviously, these CDNs and OCAs cost a lot of money to maintain. But they’re what you might call “internet infrastructure.” The investment’s already been made, so the cost of delivering HD content instead of SD content is negligible at best. Yet some premium streaming services still want to charge you different rates for SD and HD video, and they’re still behind the ball on 4K.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
They already have ads. The mandatory pre roll stuff they force on us. Then the auto play stuff while you’re looking for something worth watching. I don’t want ads, I want a better interface and more sensible pricing.
 
Of course folks are free to subscribe to ad-supported tiers. I'm just pointing out that it places a paltry value on one's time. I don't pay for anything with ads. I'd rather subscribe to fewer ad-free services and cycle through them over a few months rather than pay for more cheaper services while they suck away my free time as compensation.

Plenty of customers of streaming services offering ad-supported models seem to feel ad-supported versions are worth the discount. Obviously, it's not "right" for everybody but that's true for all products and services.

It's nice when the option is there and if someone decides ad-supported is no longer for them, it can be easy to switch to ad-free. The choice is theirs, including cancelling the service completely, and choice is a good thing.
 
Are people cheap or is Netflix’s value proposition awful? They’re the only ones charging based on streaming resolution. Their content is also significantly worse than it used to be.
If someone doesn’t think it is worth the price then they shouldn’t pay it. But to gripe about a service that costs 67 cents a day that you can use 24 hours a day if you wanted to seems petty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: opiapr
My "data" are actually real-life data: almost every person i know that have netflix, have it shared with friends. Only ONE friend i know don't shares it. Personally i have a turkish account shared in 4 people in 2 different countries and spend almost "cents" for it. If u dont want to share, that's your problem, but dont blame netflix that's too expensive only because you dont use a "feature" that, i think, made netflix so popular.
But even if you want to use it legit, netflix still have more content than any other "streaming provider" (dont know the name). Disney its monothematic (superheroes, cartoons, etc), apple, amazon, has few relevant shows (Lasso, seriously??)
That's not data. That's an anecdote. And it's not that Netflix is too expensive, but that their value proposition sucks. And clearly more and more subscribers are coming to that same conclusion based on Netflix recently losing subscribers for the first time.
 
Get rid of account sharing means get rid of many customers...
That's just it. They're not customers. They should have implemented a "Family" plan with 5 accounts or something like YouTubeTV does. It costs more but allows you to share with others. If you just want a single stream then pay less.

I honestly don't understand the entitlement of people who think it's somehow their right to steal stuff. This is basic licensing agreement stuff. "Sharing" your password ... let's call it what it is. It's theft. If you don't like the service or content then cancel.
 
That's just it. They're not customers. They should have implemented a "Family" plan with 5 accounts or something like YouTubeTV does. It costs more but allows you to share with others. If you just want a single stream then pay less.

I honestly don't understand the entitlement of people who think it's somehow their right to steal stuff. This is basic licensing agreement stuff. "Sharing" your password ... let's call it what it is. It's theft. If you don't like the service or content then cancel.
Single 4K stream wallet is ready Netflix is not....

It's also stealing on Netflix's part making indiviudals pay for 4 people to get 4K content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
Well, all their content was ripped when all these "+" services started to appear. In hindsight, Netflix dropped the ball by not focusing on content earlier.
Huh? They released House of Cards, the first Netflix original, almost a decade ago now. The problem is that most of their originals are lackluster these days while they charge more than anybody else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexhardaker
Huh? They released House of Cards, the first Netflix original, almost a decade ago now. The problem is that most of their originals are lackluster these days while they charge more than anybody else.
One show can't be relied on to keep people coming back. Netflix should have kept momentum going with their shows, yet they started doing it until other services came online.

In other words, they became what they set out to kill.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.