Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So after spending 3,200 grand… I can’t utilize the M1 Max to the fullest potential I upgraded to, because I bought a smaller screen? ?‍♂️
You bought a cheaper, thinner, much lighter box. Of course it does not perform the same!

Sorry, no free lunches. We have to pay the size/weight/price penalties to obtain maximum performance. It is unreasonable, even silly, to expect a 3.5 pound laptop to perform the same as a 1/3 heavier 4.7 pound laptop - and for less money.
 
Last edited:
So after spending 3,200 grand… I can’t utilize the M1 Max to the fullest potential I upgraded to, because I bought a smaller screen? ?‍♂️
At least you're able to get the same CPU/GPU as the 16. It wasn't that way with the previous MBP 13 4 port model...
 
So much pearl clutching here.

Jeeez...if differences are important, simply wait a couple weeks for a few reviews. And THEN place an order when you are fully informed. That's taking responsibility.

For those that have regrets purchasing the wrong laptop on release day, simply cancel the order now. Stat!
 
Macs have NEVER been good for gaming and they never will and that's a fact. Apple has never gotten gaming and never will
Never_Say_Never_Single.jpg


With the kiddos playing games on iPads and iPhones will eventually grow up and potentially use those same games OR newer ones on Macbooks.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
So after spending 3,200 grand… I can’t utilize the M1 Max to the fullest potential I upgraded to, because I bought a smaller screen? ?‍♂️

A) This is an as-yet undocumented feature you didn’t know existed when you were happy to put that money down

B) Your 14” model will operate to its fullest potential. Not even the spirit of Steve Jobs can magic away the thermal limitations of a smaller device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbirdparis
I hope the performance mode only affects GPU intensive tasks. Otherwise i feel misled as apple advertises the exact same performance for the pro and max chip in their CPU benchmarks.
 
B) Your 14” model will operate to its fullest potential. Not even the spirit of Steve Jobs can magic away the thermal limitations of a smaller device.
Speaking as someone who bought the first 12” PowerBook, you are correct about that. Fun fact - Apple tried to tell me they never said it was for lap use when I complained. ?
 
This would explain the relatively poor showing in Geekbench 5 compute test. If the M1 Max is throttled to about the equivalent of a 24 core GPU instead of 32 then the benchmark makes sense.
Geekbench explains the Geekbench performance. Seriously, numbers on Geekbench vary a lot, particularly for newly released chips. Alexander Ziskind noted this exact thing recently. So let’s all settle down a little until we get the machines and start testing them.
 
Woot! Bring back the turbo button from the 386/486 era.?
iu

Y'all geezers know what I'm talking about.?

hehe - I think the turbo button was the opposite ... it slowed down the PC-AT so you could play games that were written with hard coded timing loops for the PC-XT (else they would play faster on the PC AT - so fast that it was impossible to play them)
 
This is great news, this is how I currently get “turbo” cooling on my i9 MBP under load ?‍♂️
Probably would've been better off buying a used bottom cover on ebay and drilling tiny holes on the heatsink and fan areas it covers and using a cooling pad.

Yes your set up is non invasive and pretty simple. But I think drilling holes in a bottom cover (spare) and using direct airflow to the heatsink and CPU/GPU and fans would work exponentially better and have less fan noise.
 
So, it's not laptop-safe on battery and you have to run it on table-top and plugged in contrary to their presentation?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.