I'm sure it will share the same "style" as the prototype but it will obviously have the normal iPhone stuff as well, less (or no) seams, normal volume rocker, etc...
from my supplier the glass and lcd on a 4g
from the original article:
I'm not buying the story that this was found on the floor of some bar. Also, if it's thicker, how does this thing fit into a 3G case?
Yes, it would be very easy, just flip a bit or remove a key library/executable. The only way to restore the unit would be to reinstall the OS, but you couldn't restore from iTunes using the stock iPhone 3.1 OS.Because Apple is going to use off-the-shelf remote wipe on sensitive engineering samples?
I'm sure when Apple sends these things out they have the ability to brick them remotely.
The only interesting thing I've seen in this thread is cmaier's prediction of a glass casing. If that would happen my mind would be blown and there would be a thousand questions to follow.
ah well, ill just throw my mock up here too.![]()
Glass is a dielectric, as ct2k7 points out. If you make a sandwich of two conductors and dielectric in-between, you've made a capacitor. Could be a capacitive touch back. Could just look cool. Who knows.
i wonder if these are in fact real leaked photos if the back of the device is a touch sensor as well.
remember there was talk a while back that would allow swiping the back of the device while it was up to your ear to delete voicemails or skip to the next one. that would be pretty darn cool!
remember this...
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/01/13/next-generation-iphone-to-offer-touch-sensitive-casing/
seeing you were talking about a multi touch back. i found this a bit earlier today i dont know if they are reliable but they speak on it some what.
http://apple-iphone-blog.blogspot.com/2010/03/iphone-4g-multi-touch-back.html
Yeah but Engadget are pushing this one VERY hard (and Josh is being a bit of a dick in the comments to be honest... not that I'm massively surprised by that) so they've obviously got someone whispering to 'em that they're on to something.
Personally I really don't care because until the next iPhone is officially released we won't know one way or the other. There's just no way to tell short of someone, oh, turning one of these one and getting a non-blurry photo of it running OS 4. There'll be rampant speculation over this of course but the one thing I hope is that we don't all forget it when iPhone 4 launches. If Engadget got it right then there should be acknowledgment of that, if they've screwed up they need to acknowledge that and apologize (fat chance).
Definitely could imagine the limitless possibilities for this. But still, how will it work when you intend not to use it? Must be some heavy technicalities.
Interesting, how can the average joe schmo get one of these though?
I dunno they do make the rare mistake. For example, the squat-looking iPod nano was pretty bad in both design and the colors offered. The eMac was pretty ugly too.
are u calling me an average joe schmo? that i am not i own a phone repair shop that does tons of business and i buy parts factory direct
are u calling me an average joe schmo? that i am not i own a phone repair shop that does tons of business and i buy parts factory direct
Definitely could imagine the limitless possibilities for this. But still, how will it work when you intend not to use it? Must be some heavy technicalities.