Why does there seem to be such a strong correlation between the ignorance of someone's post and how recently they have joined MacRumors? Seems a lot of people joining just lately in 2007 have some ridiculous posts. This for example...
Thats not the point. The point is don't bash someone else when you don't have your own sh*t together.
So far this year
[...silly complaints snipped...]
Look good on your own merrits not by trying to make someone else look bad.
Uh-huh. When writers begin writing columns begging Apple to drop Leopard and start over (as is happening with Vista right now) then you can pull that line of reasoning into it all. Until then, these veiled defenses of Microsoft are going to sound ludicrous.
iMovie - Have to offer the older version when iLife 08 was released due to complaints.
Oh, gosh. Apple made an older application freely available. Yeah, that's a nightmare. And IIRC, it wasn't because the new application sucked. It was because of older file compatibility.
iPhone - 200.00 price drop, yet more problems had to offer rebates.
Only in the whiniest corners of the Internet can someone spin a $200 price drop and a rebate for early adopters as a bad thing.
iMac - Freezing issues can't even get a video driver fixed in three months.
The issue hasn't been known to Apple for three months. And anyway, from what I've seen, MS and the PC side don't exactly have a stellar record when it comes to quick fixes for exactly this kind of issue.
iTouch - firmware problems, screen issues.
I follow Apple news and I have no idea what you're talking about. You weren't stretching real hard to come up with "problems" were you? This has that distinctly bottom-of-the-barrel sound to it.
Leopard - Over two dozen patches expected in 10.5.1, thats a bit much if testing was done correctly.
Wow. Apple fixing issues in a .0 release is suddenly a bad thing? We're barely three weeks out on Leopard and the first update is right around the corner. Hmm... meanwhile, Vista SP1 is coming out when? Oh, that's right. Nobody knows yet. Windows sites have been hammering on "late 2007" which is unbelievable. Gee, Vista's been out how long now and users are still waiting for that first round of fixes? And *that's* somehow comparable to what Apple does? You've gotta be kidding me.
I'm not usually keen on doing the MS-vs.-Apple comparisons, but your claim that Apple needs to get their act together compared to MS is demonstrably ridiculous.