Not gonna comment on the functionality, I'd have to use one... but that is one cheesy looking operating system! Makes Windows look sophisticated.
Windows is sophisticated. In fact it's graphics abilities are far more sophisticated than OS X.
Not gonna comment on the functionality, I'd have to use one... but that is one cheesy looking operating system! Makes Windows look sophisticated.
I have no desire to use them. So how are they "absolutely required". If I want to check twitter, I will use launch my awesome twitter app. If I want to check my email, I will launch my mail application. If I want to check the weather, I will launch my weather application. Why do I need a widget to do this? How is a widget absolutely required?
Windows is sophisticated. In fact it's graphics abilities are far more sophisticated than OS X.
Typical Apple fanboy response.
- Multitasking are dumb
- Changing wallpapers are dumb
- Copy & Paste are dumb
- Third-Party apps are dumb
Huh? Where did you read that?
I just thought of another advanced feature for iOS5 for iPad: a clock.
Huh? Where did you read that?
I just thought of another advanced feature for iOS5 for iPad: a clock.
I have no desire to use them. So how are they "absolutely required". If I want to check twitter, I will use launch my awesome twitter app. If I want to check my email, I will launch my mail application. If I want to check the weather, I will launch my weather application. Why do I need a widget to do this? How is a widget absolutely required?
Huh? Where did you read that?
I just thought of another advanced feature for iOS5 for iPad: a clock.
What are the specs?
Does it require a dual core cpu as rumored and did they announce when it will be available?
No one uses widgets on their macs because they're totally useless and inconvenient
True, why not enjoy both, no need to hate.I'm a big Apple enthusiast. In addition I'm a big Android enthusiast.
They're two very different platforms which compliment each other. I see no reason to declare one better than the other. Each of us has unique preferences, so these two platforms serve us quite well.
Furthermore I'm really into new technologies.
Why not enjoy both? I do![]()
I'm a big Apple enthusiast. In addition I'm a big Android enthusiast.
They're two very different platforms which compliment each other. I see no reason to declare one better than the other. Each of us has unique preferences, so these two platforms serve us quite well.
Furthermore I'm really into new technologies.
Why not enjoy both? I do![]()
I use widgets and think they're awesome - granted, that's just a couple of weather widgets, a calendar, and a sysinfo app. Still, being able to pull up some info that I use often (heck, some good RSS feeds!) on a very quick basis is awesome.
Then again, I think iOS is a mess. The pop-up notifications are obnoxious and remind me of using Mac OS 9 during the days of Windows 9x where everyone and their brother had real multitasking and Mac OS had .. Apple called multitasking at the time.
In fact, that's exactly how using iOS feels compared to the alternatives out there.
Right now, the worst thing in smartphones in general is the App fad. Everything has an app - oh you want to pay your bill? GET OUR APP! Want to view Walgreens weekly ad? WE'VE GOT THIS AWESOME APP BECAUSE THE IPHONE CANT RUN FLASH! *@#(%@#%
I don't want another *@#% app. As it is, iOS kinda reminds me of Windows 3.1 with page after page of icons all over the damn place.
Stock Android is much better than jailbroken iOS functionality wise. When it comes to apps, iOS is far better than Android. If Apple improves their notification system and offers much more functionality, it'll be the best OS.
I think Apple is progressively adding more features annually. I suspect 5.0 will have better notifications, cloud solution of some sort, better social integration, native text to voice solution, too.
Microsoft's gaming abilities, and graphics card support are what give Windows the graphics performance edge.
That doesn't mean it is more advanced.
Widgets are messy IMO. Android never got it right always slowed down the device. I admit I had a first gen Android device (G1) but there was no stability in anything it did. Even calling/texting was sketchy.I use widgets and think they're awesome - granted, that's just a couple of weather widgets, a calendar, and a sysinfo app. Still, being able to pull up some info that I use often (heck, some good RSS feeds!) on a very quick basis is awesome.
Why does notifications have to be complex and tell you everything? Simple works and it's nice to have the latest text appear straight away rather than having to navigate to the "messaging" app. I admit that there should be a overlay that puts all the communication (text/mms/e-mail) in one place rather than the little round numbers. However, it worked and that's why apple has kept it through 4 version of the iOS.Then again, I think iOS is a mess. The pop-up notifications are obnoxious and remind me of using Mac OS 9 during the days of Windows 9x where everyone and their brother had real multitasking and Mac OS had .. Apple called multitasking at the time.![]()
Jealousy of the best thing Apple did to open the lid of the smartphone market. No-one needs flash as it's resource hungry and under-optimised because there's so many layers to it.In fact, that's exactly how using iOS feels compared to the alternatives out there.
Right now, the worst thing in smartphones in general is the App fad. Everything has an app - oh you want to pay your bill? GET OUR APP! Want to view Walgreens weekly ad? WE'VE GOT THIS AWESOME APP BECAUSE THE IPHONE CANT RUN FLASH! *@#(%@#%
App folders. Solves that issueI don't want another *@#% app. As it is, iOS kinda reminds me of Windows 3.1 with page after page of icons all over the damn place.
For people who like messing around with devices too much that have far too much control and instability. AKA geeks and techies. I did that with Android and got fed up with it. I just wanted a device that did calling/texting/apps well. iOS and iPhone 4 fitted that bill nicely.Well lets hope. But Apple restricts far too much, just to make iOS as functional as Android it has to be jailbroken.
It's obvious to anyone watching the google has absolutely destroyed iOS in terms of usability, fluidity, function, and UI. The widgets and notifications, and general continuity of the UI experience is exceptional, and will REALLY make it a great tablet OS (unlike iOS which is a blown up phone OS).
The problem is that the android market is a ways off of matching the app store, and so even though honeycomb is unspeakably better than iOS, I would still choose the iPad until the android market catches up. Even the good apps on the android market are usually just ports from iOS, which run much worse than they do on apple hardware (that they were originally designed for).
Having all of those amazing widgets and notifications will make the honeycomb tablet experience MUCH better than the iOS iPad experience, BUT in the end it comes down to what apps you are running, and until the market can match the app store the iPad will still win.
Seriously just think about it. OK let me open 12 difference applications in sequences on my iPad to accomplish what I can do with honeycomb by glancing at 1 or 2 of my home screens (full notifications, weather, calendar, facebook, twitter, news, email, bookmarks, all on the home screen ready RIGHT away). With iPad you click the home button, click on the apps folder, click on the app, wait for it to load, look at the info you want (say it's facebook), press the home button, click the app folder, click on the app you want (lets say weather this time), look at it, press the home button, etc... Do that 12 times and it's officially taken you TWELVE TIMES as long to gather simple information and updates, that are given to you all together and unified with honeycomb. That is why iOS completely 100% looses, and the only thing saving it is the pretty design of the hardware, the phenomenal support from apple, and the robust and polished apps/app store.
If you disagree, i'm very sorry to say, you are a fan boy plain and simple. I know people don't like this term, but in a case so obvious as this, there is nothing else to say. I've already stated that due to the app store, the iPad still wins overall, so i'm not saying that googles fancy UI makes it OVERALL the winner. If apple actually updates iOS to include proper notifications and widgets (maybe like a mission control thing from Lion) they can easily propel ahead of honeycomb due to their superior apps/apps store. It's just a matter of Apple stopping with their typical mantra of 'just good enough to get people to buy it', and actually try and pull ahead.
The fact is that some people happen to love the iPad interface, and while your usability complaints may hold water now, the fact is that Steve will walk out on stage in a few weeks and blow the world away again. Apple has one thing android will never have, and that is Steve Jobbs. Until they can get a genius like steve, android will always be just a cheap POS trying to steal apple's ideas, and they can kiss my ass!
You make some valid points, but the fact is that the android market will never catch up. Why? As a developer, I simply refuse to write apps for Android, because it's too much of a ********** hassle! With all the different hardware out there, nothing is uniform. I never have, and never will port one of my apps to android, and I know other developers with the same feelings.
Almost all of the big app developers are already making apps for Android or have committed to do begin doing so in the next year or so. Others will no doubt follow. Android also has a pretty huge collection of talented developers who develop solely for Android.
No offence but Android doesn't need you.
For people who like messing around with devices too much that have far too much control and instability. AKA geeks and techies. I did that with Android and got fed up with it. I just wanted a device that did calling/texting/apps well. iOS and iPhone 4 fitted that bill nicely.