Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I could be that the 2048x1536 iPad is the "iPad HD", and the up coming 7.8" model is 1024x768.

Graphics are then forward and backwards compatible.
 
When I bought the iPad 2, I thought they had brought me an iPad 1 cause the box just says iPad. Maybe the box will say iPad HD instead, signifying something a lot different than the last one.

When I bought my iPad, the seller thought it was an iPad 1 ... I bought it "still sealed" for a bargain on eBay.

Turned out to be an iPad 2!!!

64 gig with 3G :D
 
Macrumors is the perfect homework procrastination website. a debate about what name convention will be used.. love it

on another note, i'll be buying regardless of name
 
Saying something differently always sounds weird at first, especially when you've called it something else for so long. If it is iPad HD I'm sure we'll hear it so much in the news over the next few weeks that it'll sound strange without the HD.

Remember the 3GS ... Everyone was like wha??

Exactly. Names such as Thunderbolt, FireWire and "iPad" itself caught a lot of flack upon introduction but then people got used to those.
 
"iPad HD" makes far more sense then "iPad 3".

Why?

Because this is a minor feature bump, not a whole new iPad. The processor inside the machine is an A5X, not an A6. It likely contains extensions for Siri, but is otherwise identical to the one in the iPhone 4S.

The GPU is probably the same (maybe they've doubled the VRAM- but I doubt they'd have swapped the unit out for anything newer), the RAM is probably the same, the Flash capacities are likely the same.

Everything is the same except the display, and potentially whatever is required to drive Siri if they decided to include that.

It's not a "whole new iPad". It's just the iPad 2 on steroids, like the iPhone 4S is an iPhone 4 on steroids. It makes much more sense to name it the "iPad HD" (or "iPad 2 HD") in this manner then it is to bump the series number, because then people are going to expect a whole new device (similar to what we saw with the iPhone 5 looking nothing like the iPhone 4 chassis wise).

-SC

You should start your own blog/website... You seem to have more info on the next iPad than anyone else.
 
It makes a lot of sense.
Apple won't want to keep naming their products by numbers, what if they get to something like the iPad 14. Just sounds silly.

Actually, I think they could do it like that...

iPad 6
iPad 9
iPad X (for 10)
iPad X1 (11)
iPad X5

and so on. The numbers are a MUCH easier way to tell what generation a device is... (or half gen, like the 3Gs or 4s))
 
Apple can call it whatever they like. As long as there is a retina display, then I'm sold!

And can we ask for quad core also. :) Don't worry I am sure within a few weeks after it comes out people will find ways to use all those sweet cores.

Still HD just sound lame why would they change so quickly and the leave them selves to what for the iPad 4. Children here forget every year a new one will come out. :)
 
I think that "MaxiPad" is memorable and makes something of an iMpact.

Not as much as how its going to own the Android and Microbial tablets.

It should have a catchy name demoting those to dump.

iPad GS (Got Some) last night, much better sounding. I can see the commercial now. ;)
 
If someone registered the domain www.ipadhdxxxx.com last week (substitute the 'xxxx' with an actual word), would it be kosher for them to develop it as an unofficial price comparison website that linked to Apple accessories on sites such as Amazon? Or would it most likely result in a legal headache?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.